T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
138.1 | No problems here | VMSINT::SZETO | Simon Szeto | Wed Jun 18 1986 22:16 | 10 |
| I hope that your case is an anomaly not the norm. I had no trouble
in reapplying for a second mortgage line of credit after I paid
off the second mortgage (which I originally got from them five years
ago, also without hassle). Granted that my case may have been easier
to handle since this wasn't the first time I did business with them.
The couple of times I called them about the application I didn't
have any problems either.
--Simon
|
138.2 | EASY CASH isn't! | ODIXIE::COLE | Jackson T. Cole | Thu Jun 19 1986 14:38 | 5 |
| My worst problem with DCU has been getting my EASY CASH card to work
consistently on the PLUS system here in Atlanta, even after they said the
problems were over. They never give any straight answers if I call.
Thank heavens grocery stores still cash checks!
|
138.3 | DCU mortgage? HAH! | DEREP::GOLDSTEIN | Distributed Systems Ideology | Thu Jun 19 1986 18:43 | 12 |
| The DCU First Mortgage program is a joke. They'll make an appointment
to meet you in September to talk about a mortgage which may come
by December. Maybe it's out to October by now! And finding _that_
much took many calls, including some l o o n n g g g times on hold
trying to get somebody there to talk! I gave up and am dealing
with Coolidge Bank...
I don't know about EasyCash. They never offered me one after I
opened a share draft account. And there aren't a whole lot of machines
around, though my other bank's card works in VEC machines. All
told, it's not the most professional bank, but their rates still
seem a bit better than commercial banks & S&Ls.
|
138.4 | Even with their faults. . . | APPLE::MATUS | Roger Matus | Thu Jun 19 1986 23:22 | 18 |
| I think the DCU is great. They have great rates and great people.
I would recommend the credit union to everyone. But,
I have had both bad experiences . . .
The first mortgage program seems to be oversubscribed. My appointment
is months out AND they will not guarantee that they will even write
me a mortgage if I qualify (my house is in New Hampshire). I am
told that I should feel lucky that I was given an appointment.
The Easy Cash machine in MK2 was recently replaced. It is now down
more than it is up. Good fix, eh?
Other than that, as I said, I think the DCU is great. Their branch
office people are the best. They are friendly and helpful. My auto
loan was set-up easily and quickly. The rates are the best around.
Roger
|
138.5 | | PAPPAS::JIM | Jim Pappas | Fri Jun 20 1986 01:02 | 20 |
| Easy Cash has a serious bug. They will not let you pick your password.
This has to be the most ridiculous policy I've ever heard.
I went into the office one day to see if I could get my password
changed. The clerk said sure, took my account information and said
"I'll be back in a minute". I said tht you forgot to ask me which
password I wanted. She replied " Oh, the computer doesn't let you
pick a password, just change it (assigned by algorithm). I asked
if they would mind if I changed it 10,000 times or so until the
correct number came up.
I own several inches worth of credit cards and money machine cards
each of which (all applicable) let you pick the password. If they
were all different, how would I ever remember them without writing
down the passwords and keeping them in my wallet with my cards.
So, bottom line. The DCU Easy Cash card is useles and hence does
not occupy a position in my wallet.
Jim Pappas
|
138.6 | I'm mostly happy | SKYLAB::FISHER | Burns Fisher 381-1466, ZKO1-1/D42 | Fri Jun 20 1986 12:43 | 12 |
| I agree with .5, although I do use it (I just remember a second
pw). While we're on passwords, how about the stock people who a
few years ago sent out a reminder through the mail saying what your
password was!
But on the subject: The worst problem I have had with DCU is that
in the past the dial-in line is often not working. I hope that
improves now that they will no longer accept verbal requests for
balances etc.
Burns
|
138.7 | DCU - Definitely Can't Understand! | COIN::CICCOLINI | | Fri Jun 20 1986 17:03 | 18 |
| Easy cash cards are a joke. It took almost 3 months to get my first
one, (and I too am miffed that they "assing" me a password), and
then one day the ATM's just stopped accepting my password. Of course
it was the weekend, and so I was stuck. Monday morning a teller
told me they switched from yellow cards to red ones. Nice of them
to let ME know! Well, obviously that took another couple of months
during which I was out this convenience, (necessity!).
The tellers are all nice and helpful, but I agree that the behind
the scenes folks are arrogant. They've got a large captive audience
and I doubt they're much concerned about any ONE client. I applied
for a car loan that took them close to three weeks to deny!
Consequently, I've stopped payroll deduction and I'm cancelling
my membership. Their rates aren't THAT great.
Sandy
|
138.8 | | ECAD::LAW | | Sat Jun 21 1986 17:21 | 9 |
| I applied for a cash card and it took them 6 months before they
sent it to me. I lot times I like to get cash out of the machines
at Parker Street. 50 % of the time the machines are down. Luckly
there is a 800 number that you can call to find the other machines
that you have access too. The only problem is that you have to
pay $0.75 per transaction. Another problem is that they don't offer
a visa or mastercard like the regular banks.
|
138.9 | | MILDEW::DEROSA | Obviously, a major malfunction. | Sat Jun 21 1986 23:04 | 12 |
| "Easy touch" is a joke. It is down so often that I have long since
stopped using it.
Another complaint is that occasionally my paycheck deductions change
for no good reason. For example, when I alter the deductions for one
of my savings accounts, or add a new account, it usually takes them 2
weeks to get the "yellow card's" instructions straight. The first week
of a yellow card order, some deduction is nearly always screwed up ---
IRA, or Xmas club, etc. It takes one more week for everything to be
correct. Similar things occur when a car loan kicks in.
But rates and the personal touches make DCU an overall definite win.
|
138.10 | Not a Competitive Service | CURIE::DIMAN | | Mon Jun 23 1986 13:17 | 15 |
| I don't find the service equal to or competitive with commercial
banks.
There are long lines at the teller windows - compounded by the
fact that the tellers have to interrupt their window service
in order to handle telephone inquiries. There seems to be no
plan to provide more/better teller service during peak hours.
The ATM machine is out of service more than it is up - particularly
frustrating when you are leaving on Friday afternoon. The problem
seems to get worse - not better.
Loan interest rates are necessarily better.
I have encountered surliness when trying to get a simple answer.
|
138.11 | maybe you've got it good and don't know it? | RAJA::MERRILL | Glyph it up! | Mon Jun 23 1986 13:39 | 9 |
| No problems for me. I use the cash card infrequently but the new
drive up facility seems to provide a lot of up-time. I've found
the tellers to be busy but always pleasant. When the line is long
I try to come back later.
Rick
It's immeasurably better than pre-DCU!!
|
138.12 | More fuel for the flames | CARLIN::SULLIVAN | Mark Sullivan | Mon Jun 23 1986 15:15 | 36 |
| Let me add two votes to the anti-EASYcash (boy is that a misnomer)
sentiment. Overall I have been very happy with DCU, although I've
never had a loan with them. But I am also one of the lucky ones
who has an office in the building where I work. I also find the
phone system very useful, when it's up.
My biggest complaint is the cash machines. My wife joined DEC in
February and I convinced her to join the DCU and give up her other
bank accounts. I've been paying for it ever since. We live in Maynard
and if I had .75 for everytime I've gone to the "new" machine and
found it down (if fact I usually end up paying .75 plus gas and
time after obtaining this wonderful information), I'd be much richer.
Not to mention the grief I get from my wife for convincing her to
give up her other card.
A few other nits....
I wish to hell they'd put the ATM back in the Mill.
Has anyone else wondered who the "brilliant" engineer was who put
the ATM in the new office at Parkerr St.
Have you tried... using it on a sunny day? (you can't
see the screen until you get out
of your car to block the sun)
... using it on a rainy day? (no cover)
... getting your car close enough to use
it comfortably? (not set out from
side of the building)
I too hate the fact that I couldn't change my password.
Mark
|
138.13 | Let DCU know, its there for us! | HIGHFI::MICKOL | Erie, PA. | Tue Jun 24 1986 14:15 | 12 |
| In the Mill DCU Branch there is a sign that says something to the effect:
"If you can suggest how we can provide better service, please
call the DCU Communications Manager at DTN 223-6735"
I think DCU has gotten too big too fast. I am still a loyal shareholder and
when I get as disgruntled as some of the previous people, I plan to call the
"Communications Manager" (whoever that may be) and let her know. I suggest
that some of you do the same.....
jim
|
138.14 | re: -1 | MILDEW::DEROSA | Obviously, a major malfunction. | Tue Jun 24 1986 21:21 | 1 |
| Why don't you tell her to read this topic?
|
138.15 | DCU conference | MMO01::RESENDE | Steve @MMO | Tue Jun 24 1986 21:47 | 3 |
| Is there a CONFERENCE specifically dedicated to DCU?
There used to be one for the SAVE program, and employee purchase program, etc.
|
138.16 | | MTV::KLEINBERGER | Gale Kleinberger | Tue Jun 24 1986 23:06 | 3 |
| Re: .13 and .14 ---> why do you assume it is a "her"?
GLK
|
138.17 | She was.... | AKOV04::FLSDEV1 | George O'Grady | Wed Jun 25 1986 12:29 | 3 |
|
....because it was a "she" in the orignal DCU staff.
|
138.18 | The DCU is not "part of" Digital | EXIT26::STRATTON | Jim Stratton, Notes DIG member | Wed Jun 25 1986 23:16 | 17 |
| The DCU is a separate entity from Digital. They are not
part of Digital like (for example) Personnel or Security.
They do not have access to EasyNet; thus, they cannot "read
this topic".
I have thought about starting a DCU conference. However, it
would take some sort of formal agreement between the DCU and
Digital (or at least it would if the conference were to be of
any value). I haven't had time to pursue this.
In the meantime, call the "communications manager" listed
in a previous reply. There are actually two such people,
a male and a female. (I'll check the phone number and
get their names tomorrow when I get in the office.)
Jim Stratton (married to a DCU employee)
|
138.19 | To suggest how the DCU can provide better service... | EXIT26::STRATTON | Jim Stratton, Notes DIG member | Thu Jun 26 1986 09:48 | 3 |
| Call the DCU Communications Department at (DTN) 223-6735
(or, externally, 617-493-6735). Talk to either Donna Lane
Nelson or John Tilley.
|
138.20 | Lack of Communications | ERLANG::SUDAMA | | Thu Jun 26 1986 13:57 | 15 |
| I hate to say it, but things have gotten worse instead of better.
I did talk to Donna Lane Nelson (I have also talked to John Tilley)
and she was very pleasant, and very helpful, but I am getting the
impression that there are management problems there that are out
of their control. I don't want to go into the gory details, but
I am convinced that the people there are totally incompetent, and
I know I could have gotten much better service elsewhere for less
money. I, for one, intend to make some noise about this situation,
because I don't see why they should be operating under the auspices
of providing a service to Digital employees when we can get better
service from regular commercial banks.
Does anyone out there know anything about how the DCU board of
directors operates, or how to contact the board members?
|
138.21 | Elections | CSTVAX::MCLURE | Vaxnote your way to ubiquity | Thu Jun 26 1986 14:45 | 12 |
| re. -1
> Does anyone out there know anything about how the DCU board of
> directors operates, or how to contact the board members?
We (DCU customers) elect the board members. In fact it's been
some time since the last election (I think?). You may even want to
run for the position yourself, sounds like you have some good ideas
on how to streamline things there. At least find out who will be
running and vote.
-DAV0
|
138.22 | Don't ever close your account! | GALLO::MCCUTCHEON | Charlie McCutcheon | Mon Jun 30 1986 19:22 | 10 |
| A friend (who's coming back to DEC!) once closed her DCU account.
She said she was told "you can't open this again." She said fine,
assuming she could open another one. No. They use some antiquated
bank program that does not allow you to reuse account numbers.
DCU uses our badges as account numbers. DCU would not allow her
to have an account, because they couldn't come up with a way to
get around this (including generating a "false" badge number)!
She was rather upset, but couldn't get anywhere with them at the
time. BEWARE!
|
138.23 | DCU Ptewey... | CYBORG::LAMBERT | | Thu Jul 10 1986 11:40 | 23 |
|
The loan process at the DCU is the Pits! A year ago I applied for
a loan for a used auto, asking for about $2,500. I naturally used
my wife as a co-applicant, as she was working at the time. Well,
to make a long story short, I had to open an account for her at
the DCU or otherwise they couldn't use her as a reference. Also,
after bringing in the signed application (Karen and I both signed
it at home) they said her signature couldn't be used unless it was
notarized! I explained that I had signed my section at home as
well, and was told that I was a DCU member, so mine didn't need
to be notarized. I then explained that SHE too was a member of
the DCU. The loan officer just stared at me while her brain tried
to figure out why Karen's signature had to be notarized if she was
indeed a DCU member. Then I was told that since she was not an
employee it had to be notarized... Finally after a month the loan
was approved.
The other extreme. I traded in the used car 2 months ago and bought
a new Dodge. I was approved (myself as the only applicant) in less
than two hours, and drove the car home the next night.
brian
|
138.24 | BIG DIfference in My situation and worth the hassle. | ZEPPO::MAHLER | Michael | Thu Jul 10 1986 17:52 | 6 |
|
What was the difference in the loan rate between DCU and the Car
Dealer ?
|
138.25 | Yes, it is worth it. | APPLE::MATUS | Roger Matus | Wed Jul 16 1986 17:08 | 10 |
| I had no problem at all with my new car loan. My wife is not a
Digital employee. But, we do have a joint checking ("sharedraft")
account with them. Our loan was approved within two hours.
The new car rate for 3yrs. with 20% down is 9%. The Toyota dealer
was offerring 12.5.
Yes, it is worth it.
Roger
|
138.26 | VOTE! | JETSAM::COREY | | Wed Jul 16 1986 17:53 | 15 |
| One way to change things...CHANGE the BOD! Next time the vote comes
up, vote out the encumbents, unless you KNOW they're doing a good
job!
Did any of you read the candidate summaries the last time? Name
the one who did not even write their OWN SUMMARY this time. I was
apalled, and didn't vote for the person, even though they've been
around since the beginning. Sounds like mgmt is getting a little
"dusty".
If you're so sure of yourself that you get someone else to write
your resume/summary, you've been around too long in my opinion.
I wrote a letter expressing the above, and got no response. (Didn't
expect any.) Someday I'm going to drop by in person.
|
138.27 | He lived to tell the tale... | ERLANG::SUDAMA | | Thu Jul 17 1986 13:53 | 30 |
| Just to bring things up to date, I have finally gotten my loan
approved (it only took 3 months), after repeated hassles and delays
which were definitely caused by incompetent handling of the application
by DCU. I did talk to members of the BOD, as well as the Federal
Credit Union Administration. I currently have a complaint before
the Supervisory Committee of the Credit Union, which is supposed
to represent the members when they have problems.
I just want to warn anyone who may have to deal with the first mortgage
department that they will not treat you with the consideration you
would expect as a Digital employee, and you are probably better
off going to a commercial outfit in terms of the quality of service,
time, and overall cost. I have sat in the lobby and listened to them
using the same stall tactics on everyone else that they used on me,
and unless you have a desire for self-torture I would recommend
doing business elsewhere.
Also, I have learned that federal laws require the disclosure of
information about the loan process in the form of HUD publications
which are supposed to help you in comparing terms between different
loan agencies. I was never given this information, and if you do
decide to torture yourself, you should insist that it be provided
to you.
As a last note, I would just like to add that I really hope no one
else from Digital (or from anywhere, for that matter) has to go
through what I did. I realize that the Credit Union provides good
service in many other respects, and I don't know why they have slipped
on this particular function, but I do intend to follow up with my
complaints and try to see that things are changed.
|
138.28 | magnetic encoding | WORDS::BADGER | Can Do! | Fri Aug 01 1986 23:24 | 19 |
|
I'm really suprised that no one has mentioned the 'biggie'. DCU
allows our checks to be magnetically encoded by the PAYEE. I've
had several cases where the PAYEE encoded this information incorrectly
and DCU paid the wrong amount for the check.
Bottom line is that I must verify that each check on the return
statement is paid the right amount. I've had unpayment and
overpayment.Both cause extreme hassel between the PAYEE, me and
DCU. I've had many conversations with DCU personel who claim that
all banks do it this way. One of the offending PAYEEs, Citibank,
claims that they encode the wrong amount a lot(!), but most banks
wont pay the amount as the written amount is verified.
The extreme worry is that after the checking acount is dried up
by paying the wrong amount, they leap frog through your savings
acounts to make up the difference, then to your reseve accounts.....
oh what fun they have!
I've considered going back to real money.
ed badger
|
138.29 | | COVERT::COVERT | John Covert | Sat Aug 02 1986 01:41 | 16 |
| re .28, Payee encoding the checks.
Of course the Payee encodes the checks! That's how the whole nationwide
check clearing system works. The amount must be on the check when it
enters the system. It is put on no later than the first bank it reaches,
sometimes it's even put on in the accounts-receivable division of the
company to whom you've sent the check.
I have had four mis-encoded checks (that were not caught before getting
deducted from my account) in the past twenty years. Only two of them
were serious enough that I really needed to do anything about it; once
it was off a nickel and I had Shawmut straighten it out (which they did
by handing me a nickel!) and once I decided the three cents wasn't worth
my time to even think about.
/john
|
138.30 | | CSSE32::PHILPOTT | CSSE/Lang. & Tools, ZK02-1/N71 | Mon Aug 04 1986 13:00 | 13 |
| I had a check missencoded a few months ago: a check sent to the
firm I lease my car from was misscoded in the payees favor by $20,
and I found out because I got a letter from them telling me I had
overpaid my account - before I got the cleared check back from the
bank.
It wasn't worth worrying about (other than the concern that nobody
at my bank apparently looked at what I had written on the check),
since my invoice for the following month reflected the "overpayment".
Yes - it is the way the system works, and it stinks!
/. Ian .\
|
138.31 | worse than you make it | WORDS::BADGER | Can Do! | Tue Aug 05 1986 00:16 | 15 |
| I have no problem with the payee encoding the check, John (.29),
my problem is with DCU paying the encoded amount instead of the
amount *I* have specified on the check. Some banks do take the
extra step of checking.
Take two real live cases. I write a $20 check to Mobil. They cash
it for $200. My next check bounce. No problem? take to the people
who got bounced checks!
I write a $4832 check to citibank. They cash it for $48.32. Charge
me $80 extra interest on account. No problems, just fustrations
getting it straighten out.
If I write the amount on the check, thats how mcuh I want payed!
ed badger
(According to DCU this problem happens a lot! so don't sound too
sumg, it will happen to you if you use DCU)
|
138.32 | doesn't happen to me | DSSDEV::SAUTER | John Sauter | Tue Aug 05 1986 09:06 | 7 |
| It may indeed happen a lot, but it only seems to happen to other
people. I've been verifying each entry on my checking account
statement against my personal records since before DCU existed,
and I've only found one check miscoded. The miscoding was by one
cent, so I didn't complain. I did, however, change my style of
writing the amount in a check, to prevent it from happening again.
John Sauter
|
138.33 | please explain how (.32) | WORDS::BADGER | Can Do! | Wed Aug 06 1986 00:03 | 9 |
| John, I am very courious on how you changed your style of writing
checks to prevent it from happening. please explain.
somehow 4832.00 in the little box, and four thousand eight hundred
thirty two dollars on the line didn't prevent the encoding of $48.32.
I am happy for all those who don't run into this problem, but I
sence that
like death, miscoding will get you too, someday.
ed badger
|
138.34 | How a clearing house works | NY1MM::SWEENEY | Pat Sweeney | Wed Aug 06 1986 00:57 | 23 |
| re: .29
Your payee's bank makes the MICR encoding of the amount at the bottom
of the check.
But DCU checks seem to have this problem (more than others), why?
A clearing house member has the right to "fail" an item within 72
hours of presentation. The most common "fail" is insufficient funds.
But there are other reasons why a bank could fail a check: a question
about the signature, the account is frozen because of court order,
and so forth. The clearing house systems got dozens and dozens
of codes for failing.
One code is "amount verification": namely that the written and encoded
amounts do not match. The new amount is encoded on a strip of paper
taped to the bottom of the check. The old amount is credited and
the new amount is debited. It's transactions like this that make
banks want to no clear checks for _days_. (Look through your old
checks for ones with a strip taped on the bottom...)
Of course, this can only be done by institution which actually verifies
the amounts...
|
138.35 | my check techniques | DSSDEV::SAUTER | John Sauter | Wed Aug 06 1986 09:17 | 16 |
| re: .33--I can't show it accurately on a character-cell device,
but I think I can describe what I did. I used to write the amount
as $99 followed by superscripted, underlined, number of cents.
This makes the number of cents hard to read, even though it is clear
where to find the decimal point. I have changed to writing the
amount as $99.99, thus giving larger digits for the cents. The
spelled-out amount was, and still is, written as "... and 99/100"
so a reader who can't be sure where the decimal point is in the
digital amount can get the information from the spelled-out amount.
re: .34--I have seen the piece of paper attached to the bottom of
some of my checks, but not recently. I have never looked under
it to discover if the amount was changed. I always assumed that
it was attached because the original check did not read through
the MICR reader for some reason.
John Sauter
|
138.36 | | WFOVX3::KLEINBERGER | Gale Kleinberger | Wed Aug 06 1986 11:45 | 11 |
| I have looked under the little strip on white paper taped (really
glued) over an original encoded amount, and have ALWAYS found that
the amount underneath was the correct amount also.
I think maybe the DCU might be an isolated case, as I have been
using a checking account for about 12 years now, and have NEVER had
a problem..and I check all my checks each month. I bank with BayBank
and they have never had this problem to my knowledge (but I am sure
there is someone out there just waiting to prove me wrong :-)...)
- Gale
|
138.37 | THE DCU SAYS IT AIN'T THEIR FAULT! | FSTVAX::OVIATT | Steve Oviatt | Wed Aug 06 1986 11:58 | 21 |
|
My friend at DCU says when you write the check to someone, it's
the payee's Bank which puts the little mag stripe on the the bottom, NOT
the DCU. As it's basically a manual process, accidents will happen.
After that little stipe is put on the check, nobody sees the check again
except a machine which reads the stripe (unless there's a question about
the check).
DCU pays the checks by responding to a Mag Tape which is sent
daily by the FED (30k checks nightly, I'm told). The actual check won't
arrive until anywhere from a day to 3 weeks later. So, in essence, the
DCU is re-paying the FED for the amount your payee's bank demanded from
the FED. All these amounts are moved by Computer.
The only Human interface in the process is the poor clerk who has
just a second or two to read the amount on the face of the check and then
encode the stripe at the bottom of the check. That clerk belongs to the
PAYEE's bank, NOT the DCU.
Hope that helps. I must admit, I got quite the education when I
called to give my friend at DCU some grief! :-)
|
138.38 | here's a dollar, can you give me John's balance? | OLORIN::SEGER | | Wed Aug 06 1986 13:01 | 23 |
| For everyone who likes to gives institutions like banks grief (and I love it),
I've taken to writing checks like a friend suggested, namely reducing all
fractions as we were taught in grade school. So, when I write a check for
21.64, I write in words "twenty one and 16/25...". As far as I can tell it's
perfectly legitimate!
On a different subject, how many people have transferred money from your account
into another employee's account? When I last did it (about a year ago), I was
handed a statement for the person's account to which the money was transferred!
As the fates would have it, this was the same person who like to reduce to the
least common denominator. So, when I told him that the DCU had just given me
his balance...
He walked up to a window and told a teller, "here's a dollar, I'd like to know
what YOUR balance is!". After she recovered from this, he asked why DCU has a
policy of giving out HIS balance to anyone who wants to put some money into his
account! Eventually, he was told that this was not the correct procedure and
that his statement should have been placed in a sealed envelope before giving it
to me. But what prevents me from then opening it?
Any updates on the current procedures?
-mark
|
138.39 | | CSSE32::PHILPOTT | CSSE/Lang. & Tools, ZK02-1/N71 | Wed Aug 06 1986 14:24 | 9 |
| this trick is not even an [purely] American one: a couple of years
ago a London newspaper created a political scandal by paying a small
sum into a politicians account and getting supposedly confidential
data as a result.
The only real answer is to keep all your money in a biscuit tin
under your bed :-)
/. Ian .\
|
138.40 | Your privacy is our last concern! | HIGHFI::MICKOL | Erie, PA. | Wed Aug 06 1986 14:40 | 7 |
| I deposited some money in my brother's DCU account. I asked the teller what the
balance was. She said I wasn't named as a joint owner of the account, so she
couldn't tell me. She then proceeded to give me my brother's deposit receipt in
an UNSEALED envelope! In months past, when a deposit such as this was made, the
receipt was sent to the account owner via U.S. Mail...
Jim
|
138.41 | optional security fatures | CSSE32::PHILPOTT | CSSE/Lang. & Tools, ZK02-1/N71 | Wed Aug 06 1986 15:32 | 15 |
| I have the following story to tell...
As it happens my landlord is also a fellow DEC employee. Recently
I handed him my rent, and he asked me to deposit it in his DCU account
(as I was going to DCU for myself).
I duly paid it in and was handed the receipt, folded once and fastened
with a single staple... neat! (they did ask me if I would like them
to mail it to him...)
Incidentally I thought the idea of a credit union was, in effect,
that we, the account holders, are in effect the owners. In which
case if we don't like the service perhaps we should get it changed?
/. Ian .\
|
138.42 | Maybe I've just been lucky | AKOV68::BOYAJIAN | Forever On Patrol | Thu Aug 07 1986 06:35 | 30 |
| I've been a member of DCU since it began and haven't had any of
the aforementioned problems. I did get handed the balance for a
friend's account when I deposited money into his account, which
did boggle my mind, but...
(1) I've noticed a few times (easily less than a half dozen) when
the amount paid on a check was incorrect, but usually on the order
of pennies. Since it was so miniscule, I ignored it, only later
to find out that the problem *was corrected by DCU without my having
to mention it to them*.
(2) A couple of years ago, I got my first loan through them (a new
car loan), and had *no* problem. From submission of application
to getting handed the check, I think it took four days.
(3) Aside from the occasional downtime on the EasyCash Card machines,
I've been pleased with the system. I've had no problem with the
Monec/Plus machines either in this area, or in Minneapolis, where
I've often found myself using the Plus machines to get cash. Since
I haven't used an actual DCU ATM since I moved out of PKO, I've
never had to worry about machine downtime. As for the $.75 charge,
it may interest you to note that the actual charge is supposed to
be a dollar, but DCU eats $.25 of that.
Oh, there *is* one problem I've had. I was sent a cheque in pounds
sterling by someone in Britain. While DCU will accept it for deposit
into my account, they will charge a "handling fee" of $20.00! For
a cheque of roughly $25.00, it's clearly not worth it.
--- jerry
|
138.43 | | COVERT::COVERT | John Covert | Thu Aug 07 1986 12:42 | 11 |
| I think you'll find the $20.00 handling fee for accepting a foreign check to
be typical. Shawmut has charged me as much as $21.00. The best way to get
foreign funds transferred into your account is (at least in the case of
funds from Germany) to have the foreign depositor go to his bank and issue
a transfer order with the notation that all charges are to be paid by the
originator.
Otherwise, have your foreign correspondent buy U.S. Dollar travellers cheques
and mail them to you.
/john
|
138.44 | foreign checks | TIGEMS::ARNOLD | Never play leapfrog with a unicorn | Thu Aug 07 1986 13:16 | 10 |
| Yes, $20 seems to be pretty standard. Recently after a trip to
Geneva, I submitted my expense voucher and was sent a check from
Switzerland *in Swiss francs*. In addition to the $20 fee, Shawmut
would not credit my account until the check cleared the Swiss bank,
a process that took almost 6 weeks. Solution for next time: ask
the foreign folks to write the check in dollars. Shawmut tells
me they would then treat it like any other third-party check, where
it's creditted to your account immediately.
Jon
|
138.45 | | COVERT::COVERT | John Covert | Thu Aug 07 1986 14:00 | 11 |
| Shawmut charged me $21 for a U.S. Dollar Eurocheque drawn on Bayerische
Vereinsbank, and also did not credit my account until it had been sent
for collection.
I suspect if it had been drawn on Dresdner Bank (a correspondent of
Shawmut) it would have been handled more expeditiously, since I have
written German Mark checks on my Shawmut account which have cleared
through Dresdner Bank at no cost but through Bayerische Vereinsbank
at a cost of about $14.
/john
|
138.46 | end of loan blues... | OLORIN::SEGER | | Thu Aug 07 1986 17:32 | 14 |
| I was about to say I never had any problems with my new car load, but...
Everything went real smoothly for 3 years. Then my loan got paid off, but they
still kept putting a weekly deposit into the account for the loan that had a
balance of 0! I had to physically walk over to the DCU to transfer money around
and get it right.
Would it have been that difficult to simply stop the deductions when the balance
went to 0?
Sigh... Another one of those blasted computer programmers fouling up my life
again.
-mark
|
138.47 | I like that bug/feature | BPT::MOREAU | Ken Moreau | Thu Aug 07 1986 17:41 | 12 |
| > Then my loan got paid off, but they
>still kept putting a weekly deposit into the account for the loan that had a
>balance of 0!
Having had 3 car loans through DCU, I have always liked that feature. At the
end of each month, the system notices that you have a balance of $0 in your
loan account, so it transfers the money to your savings account (assuming you
have one). I had paid off a car loan and not noticed it for a period of several
months, and discovered it only when my savings balance was significantly larger
than I had assumed it would be.
-- Ken Moreau
|
138.48 | not really a big deal, but... | OLORIN::SEGER | | Fri Aug 08 1986 14:10 | 12 |
| I guess I missed the point of the note...
I have some of my pay deposited into my DCU checking account and the remainder
shows up on my pay stub which goes into an account in BayBank. I expected that
anmount (the one that goes into BayBank) to go up as soon as my load was paid
off, but it didn't. That meant it took an extra few weeks to get the money
switched over.
Not a real big deal, but it was a surprise. I guess my point is that they
decided to deposit MORE into the DCU than I wanted them to.
-mark
|
138.49 | | COVERT::COVERT | John Covert | Fri Aug 08 1986 15:14 | 7 |
| re .-1
I don't see how you can possibly expect DEC to know that you've paid off your
loan to DCU! DEC is only aware of an amount to send to DCU and can't change
that amount without your authorization.
/john
|
138.50 | International Banking for Beginners | NY1MM::SWEENEY | Pat Sweeney | Fri Aug 08 1986 21:21 | 17 |
| re: Acceptance of Foreign Bank Drafts
There are two ways to move money that are cheaper and more expeditious
than checks:
One is a wire transfer. The fee is typically $5, $10, or $15 and
you'll have the satisfaction of knowing the system that processes
the wire transfer is probably made by Digital.
For a longer term arrangement, the thing to get is called a letter of
credit. This is a credit line that is says, in effect, accept this
person's checks as if they were drawn upon Citibank's account with you.
You pay for the letter of credit as a fee, you've been given a
guarantee of eventual payment, not a loan.
Before the Federal Reserve Act, American banks were not obligated
under Federal law to accept the checks of other banks at full face value.
|
138.51 | | AKOV68::BOYAJIAN | Forever On Patrol | Sat Aug 09 1986 04:55 | 12 |
| Actually, I was thinking about going to the branch of Barclay's
that's in Boston to see if I can deal with them. If they don't
charge a handling fee, I may open up an account with them to
deal with this type of thing in the future.
The thing that irritates me is that I've ordered things from the
UK and paid by check in US$ without this sort of problem (the
recipient has, in each case, said beforehand that such was OK).
It rubs me the same way as the attitude many Americans have that
everyone on Earth should speak English.
--- jerry
|
138.52 | | COVERT::COVERT | John Covert | Sat Aug 09 1986 12:21 | 7 |
| It's not clear that Barclay's in Boston will be any help.
A customer of Barclay's U.K. who goes to Barclay's in Boston with a cheque and
a cheque cashing card will have the rude awakening that there is a 24-hour
wait for a Telex to be sent and replied to and a significant charge.
/john
|
138.53 | | ULTRA::KARGER | Paul A. Karger | Mon Aug 11 1986 10:40 | 8 |
| The branch of Barclay's in Boston will be no help. They are a branch
of Barclay's International division and do not deal with retail
customers at all. The branches of Barclay's in New York, by contrast,
are retail branches that will deal with people off the street.
By the way - international wire transfers typically cost $20 to
$30. If you know a bank that will wire funds to Europe for only
$5 or $10, please tell me!
|
138.54 | | HARPO::CACCIA | | Mon Aug 11 1986 17:56 | 16 |
|
Want a real shock! have a check get either cleared or bounced by
someone and then all of a sudden discover that the amount is gone
from your account again... It seems that a bank can send a form
to the federal reserve bank stating that the original check has
been lost and the feds wil then bill DCU and DCU will bill you,
all very quietly without you ever finding out about it until all
your other checks turn to rubber. A conneticut bank sent my check
to the phoe co. and forgot they did so and put in such a claim for
a lost check. courtesy of that I also found out that if you bounce
eight checks in a short period of time, your checking account is
automatically closed.
|
138.55 | | AKOV68::BOYAJIAN | Forever On Patrol | Tue Aug 12 1986 06:17 | 5 |
| re:.52,.53
Thanks for the info. I was afraid of that.
--- jerry
|
138.56 | speak of the Devil | DSSDEV::SAUTER | John Sauter | Tue Aug 12 1986 08:53 | 8 |
| I got my monthly statement from DCU yesterday. Two of the checks
had wrong amounts! Both errors were in my favor, but even if they
hadn't been I wouldn't have complained, because the errors were
very small.
That makes a lifetime total of 3 errors in check amounts since I
joined DCU.
John Sauter
|
138.57 | phatom checkwriters | NATASH::WEIGL | breathum via turbo - ergo faster | Tue Aug 12 1986 16:39 | 7 |
|
My last statement had somebody else's drafts (checks) listed on
my statement. What a surprise to see that I'd written a dozen checks
on an account that I don't even have checks for!!
DCU hasn't a clue as to why that happened, other than (ahem) computer
error.....
|
138.58 | | KOALA::ROBINS | Scott A. Robins, ZKO2-2/R94 | Thu Aug 14 1986 18:16 | 5 |
| My statement had a check # 964000 listed, but # 964 was not.
"Computer error"
Scott
|
138.59 | the drama continues... | WORDS::BADGER | Can Do! | Fri Aug 15 1986 00:07 | 18 |
| The drama continues....When we last visited the problem,Citibank
encodes my check I write for $4832, for $48.32. I point out the
problem with choice words to both Citibank and DCU. They say to
write Citibank a new check for the difference and enclude a
photocopy of the 'check' so I don't get hit with interest charges.
Today, I receive my Citibank statement with my new check listed
as paid, all interest
taken off, and, and,, an additional credit of $4796!!!!!+-couple
dollars.
Back on the DCU side, the only way they can figure is that Citibank
plans on submitting the photocopy for payment. We put a stop payment
on that check.
Any other holes? arrrrrrrrrrrg magnetic encoding, where can I
trade my pen in for the encoder?
ed badger anyone want to party on my new $4796? maybe its not
so bad a problem ;-]
|
138.60 | | CSSE32::PHILPOTT | CSSE/Lang. & Tools, ZK02-1/N71 | Fri Aug 15 1986 18:24 | 11 |
| Well it could be worse: the [British] National Giro Bank uses OPTICAL
character readers to scan checks - no human operator encodes them
unless the OCR can't read them. so if your '7' looks like a '1'
or whatever you may get some interesting debits against your account.
They claim a very low error rate however.
/. Ian .\
PS The OCR readers are American, and until recently were connected
to venerable PDP-15s!
|
138.61 | I've had few problems with checks | VMSDEV::SZETO | Simon Szeto | Mon Aug 18 1986 19:25 | 21 |
| re .28 ff:
In twenty years of using checking accounts, I've rarely seen the wrong
amount encoded. There were only a few times that my cancelled checks
had the little strip on the bottom with the correct amount. DCU
doesn't give you back the cancelled checks of course, but in the five
years I've used DCU, there was only one instance where the check
cleared with an amount different from the one I wrote. The difference
was fifty cents in my favor, and was probaby the result of reading
'77/xx' in the box as '27/xx'. Since this happened only a couple of
months ago, this may be rectified by the payee soon.
Ironically, there was one check payable to DCU but drawn on another
bank that initially cleared in my favor. Apparently DCU or their
clearing bank encoded the round sum in dollars without noticing the odd
cents. If they had read the amount written in words ("Fifteen hundred
dollars and eighty cents") this mistake would not have been made. The
eighty cents were debited the following month.
--Simon
|
138.62 | choose u weapon? | REGENT::MERRILL | Win one for the Glypher. | Wed Aug 20 1986 13:48 | 16 |
| According to the "law" the number in the box is not "legal" but
it is the written-out number that has legal status. While this
makes it real tough to turn "seven" into "two" or "one", it ignores
the reality that people, even keypunch operators and optical character
readers only "scan" the-number-in-the-box!
The real reason for the law is that it's terribly easy to add "1,"
to a check but harder to add "one thousand" to a check.
Thus it is legal to x-out the box, but I wouldn't try it if I were
you! This leaves us with two options: (1) write so clearly that
the clerk and the OCR never make mistakes; (2) write so badly that
they ALWAYS have to read the text!
RMM
|
138.63 | the saga continues...thanks DCU | WORDS::BADGER | Can Do! | Mon Aug 25 1986 17:38 | 19 |
| The soap continues........last time here, Citibank credits me an
extra $4796 on my account. And the DCU rep figures the only possible
why they can get into my account is to resubmit the check for $4832.
So we put a 'stop payment' on it.
Guess what, 'stop payment' didn't really mean stop payment to DCU
and they paid!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Who cares if they couldn't find
an extra 5K in my account, pay first and worry latter. Like on
the phone to me asking what I can do to help. AAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRGGGGG.
I really don't believe that Citibank didn't need a check (just the
photocopy) to get funds out out my account even when we put the
stop payment on the check number. DCU paid given a slip of paper
with my account number on it and how much they wanted. conforting.
Ya, maybe its only happening to me, but I still feel like I'm
mailing out blank checks.
The computer age is fun.
ed badger (hopefully, the next installment doesn't find me in jail
for writing so many bad checks!)
|
138.64 | the miracle of computers? | REGENT::MERRILL | Win one for the Glypher. | Tue Aug 26 1986 10:08 | 8 |
| DCU is not alone! Although the "stop-payment" costs $10 or more
it does not actually work because all the checks are cleared
automatically via EFT - the stop is a manual operation that can
take time to implement and correct.
Good Luck,
Rick
|
138.65 | What *IS* a "check" (etc.) ? | ATLANT::SCHMIDT | I Use VMS. My Cereal? Raw Bits! | Tue Aug 26 1986 15:49 | 21 |
| Ed:
I believe you're assuming too much about what a "Check"
(or a "Now" or a "Share-draft") is.
All that the "check" is is an order from you authorizing
a "bank" to pay someone on your behalf, from your funds
or credit line.
It doesn't mater what the physical form of the order is -- I
once heard about a "check" written upon a restaurant table-
cloth which was then succesfully negotiated. It can be scrib-
bled on a Post-it. It can be produced by your LN03. It
probably can even be a photocopy. It doesn't matter.
It is only for their own convenience that "Banks" like checks
which look like checks and have magnetic printing and the like.
Atlant
|
138.66 | how's your credit rating? | VAXWRK::SKALTSIS | Deb | Mon Sep 01 1986 20:14 | 10 |
| RE: .63
In light of all of your problems, have you pulled a credit report
on yourself lately? If any of this nonsense has caused anyone to
send in a negitive report on you to a credit bureau, if might be
wise to find out now and get it straightened out now, instead of
being "surprised" in a couple of years when you might want to get
a car loan or a morgage.
Deb
|
138.67 | Some improvement | ARGUS::CURTIS | Dick 'Aristotle' Curtis | Fri Sep 05 1986 00:14 | 22 |
| In the last month or so since they (finally!) moved their
system onto a VAX, the availability of the Maynard ATMs has
improved dramatically. They don't even seem to need all night
(yes, from 18:00 until 09:00) to do payroll on Wednesday nights.
It was a good thing, too, because I'd gotten shat on so many times
by their useless ATMs that I was about to walk in and insist on
being introduced to the person in charge of driving patrons away.
BTW, there are legal rules as to what constitutes a check. I
believe the specs are (1) bank name; (2) account number of utterer;
(3) name of entity to whom it's payable; (4) amount of money; (5)
signature of utterer. I've heard that the IRS has received checks
written on a shirt (yes, the shirt of his back!), carved on a
watermelon, and tattooed on a pig (don't know whether it was alive
or dead). I'd be inclined to use a toilet seat, myself. There is
a caveat: this sort of thing plays hell with the banks' check
handling system. They aren't exactly thrilled, and you're likely
to pay $20 or more for the joke.
Dick
|
138.68 | DCU Data | MORMPS::WEST | | Fri Oct 17 1986 19:39 | 25 |
| (the following is from PARITY::CONSUMER, a notes file with its own
complement of DCU concerns (note 360))
------------------------------------------
New features from DCU:
1) They round your account balance DOWN to the nearest $5 before
calculating interest they pay you (but not interest you pay them).
2) They will be closed from 12/25 thru 1/5/87 (and no doubt quite crowded
on the 23rd & 24th). Thus, if you try to avoid the crowds, that's 7
business days in a row (13 regular days) that our 'bank' will be
inaccessible.
------------
Has anyone noticed how DCU is treating SAVERS lately? I will admit
that their loan programs appear to be very good, but it seems to me
that their certificate, checking, and IRA rates are all somewhat low.
DCU came into existance in 1980, and thus has no old low-interest
loans to weight them down, so I'm having trouble understanding why
they don't offer market rates. Also, (in a quite un-non-profit-
organization-like move) they have stopped paying interest on checking
accounts below $500. Has anyone shopped DCU vs banks for IRAs,
certificates, etc lately?
|
138.69 | | COVERT::COVERT | John Covert | Sat Oct 18 1986 12:39 | 18 |
| Interest rates are down all around. My Thomson McKinnon National Money Market
Fund had an average yield from 22 August to 18 September of only 5.62%.
Are you sure DCU has completely stopped paying interest on Checking below $500?
I thought they paid the Share 1 rate below $500 (5%, effective 5.13%) and 5.45
(effectively 5.6) if the account was over $500.
But I might be wrong.
They are certainly better than commercial banks in the area, where you have to
keep $1000 *minimum* balances to avoid service charges on N.O.W. accounts and
$2000-$2500 minimums on Money Market accounts.
Move your money to England, where 7%+ interest rates are still common. Of
course, you have to risk exchange rate fluctuations!
/john
|
138.70 | no interest for small savers | BINKLY::WINSTON | Jeff Winston (Hudson, MA) | Sat Oct 18 1986 15:53 | 4 |
| >Are you sure DCU has completely stopped paying interest on Checking below $500?
Yes, if your sharedraft account (#5) has $499 or less in it. It will accrue
*ZERO* interest (maybe that's how they pay upkeep on their building :-) )
|
138.72 | no interest below $500, been going on for a while | KLAATU::BERUBE | Claude G. | Mon Oct 20 1986 11:10 | 21 |
| I just checked with the local branch here, and apparently they
haven't been paying interest for sometime on Checking account balances below
$500, she has been working for the DCU branch here for 6 months, and she has
never heard of paying interest when the balance falls below $500.
Since I have had a Checking account with them ever since they
oferred the money market rate and keep the required minimum I never would of
knowned had I not read this note. I always make it a point to read the
quarterly bulletin from DCU I receive with my statement and never noticed a
statement about this or the fact about the regular savings rates have been
droping, the only way they have been notifying me is via the bulletin board
in the branch office, which I now make it a point to read.
Another Credit union I deal with (St. Mary's Bank, Manchester N.H.)
has just in the last month dropped their interest rates on their saving
accounts from 7% to 6.5% ( and you recieved notices in the MAIL as well as
at the teller windows), and their C.D., IRA's tend to be a percentage point
higher then DCU, and their loans are competitive with the local banks around
town. Maybe I sure reconsider why I use DCU (what a pain)
Claude
|
138.73 | DCU is not competitive | COOKIE::SUSSWEIN | | Mon Oct 20 1986 12:50 | 2 |
| CD rates at S&L's in colorado are 1% to 1-1/2% HIGHER than at the
DCU.
|
138.74 | DCU only closed three "working" days | EXIT26::STRATTON | I note, therefore I am | Tue Oct 21 1986 09:30 | 20 |
| (This was formerly .71; I deleted it and am reposting it
here to fix a couple of typos. - Jim Stratton)
re
> < Note 138.68 by MORMPS::WEST >
>
> 2) They will be closed from 12/25 thru 1/5/87 (and no doubt
> quite crowded on the 23rd & 24th). Thus, if you try to avoid
> the crowds, that's 7 business days in a row (13 regular days)
> that our 'bank' will be inaccessible.
Of those "7 business days in a row", Digital (US, anyway)
itself will be closed four of those days, 12/25, 12/26,
1/1 and 1/2.
The three Digital "working" days that the DCU will be closed
are Monday, 29 December through Wednesday, 31 December.
Jim Stratton
|
138.75 | Call the DCU | EXIT26::STRATTON | I note, therefore I am | Tue Oct 21 1986 09:36 | 17 |
| On the DCU policy of rounding down account balances before
paying interest - that, according to my wife (a DCU employee
who found a memo from DCU management on this point), is
something the DCU is doing as a result of the recommendation
from the National Credit Union Association (known to the
DCU as "the feds").
On the "no interest on share 5 accounts when the balance
goes below $500" - that has been true for over a year.
As I said many replies ago, if you have questions, problems,
suggestions, complaints, and so on, about the DCU, putting
them here is not the best way to get them resolved. Call
either John Tilley or Donna Lane Nelson at 8-223-6735.
Jim Stratton
|
138.76 | bullshit | WORDS::BADGER | Can Do! | Tue Oct 21 1986 15:12 | 10 |
|
Respectfully, Talking to DCU, specifically John, is like talking
to your terminal. You will get the same results.
The policy of not paying interst on on "share 5 " accounts was news
to me when I read it here. Why didn't they tell us (not that they
had to tell us.....).
our credit union. bullshit.
ed badger
|
138.77 | They let me know in the mail | HITECH::BLOTCKY | | Sat Nov 01 1986 22:53 | 4 |
| I found out about the "no interest below $500" policy when it was in on of
the news letters.
Steve
|
138.78 | dcu data | MORMPS::WEST | | Tue Nov 11 1986 22:48 | 14 |
| Interesting - the first published notice I've seen for nominations for
the annual election of DCU's board of directors was in the DTW that
came out today. Says that to be on the ballot, you have to either
1) apply to DCU. The 'nominating board' will interview applicants and
select those who they feel are fit to be on the ballot. (Sounds
like the way they approve loans). You must apply in the next 15 days.
2) Collect 700 signatures, forms won't be available until after 12/15.
[wonder why the delay]? They don't say how long you have, but the
election is on 2/13/87, and figuring lead time to print/mail ballots,
etc, i'd guess no more than 30 days to collect all 700. [not too bad]
I wonder how much energy they put into soliciting a field of candidates.
|
138.79 | Another DCU mess-up | ULTRA::HERBISON | B.J. [Digital Internal Use Only] | Wed Dec 10 1986 18:38 | 41 |
| I just received a receipt from DCU that shows transactions
of another person's account. It shows their loan payment,
I was expecting a receipt for my loan payment.
DCU prints receipts on an odd size yellow paper. A receipt
normally looks like this:
Burst --> +------------------------------------+
| Mmm nn, 19nn nn:nn xM|
| |
about 4 3/4" | TRANSACTIONS |
| |
| Thank You Your teller...|
| |
Could be burst>+------------------------------------+
| |
| NAME |
about 3 3/4" | ADDRESS |
| |
| Receipt 9999999999 (9 99)|
Burst --> +------------------------------------+
The extra place in the middle where the paper can be burst
is what caused the problem. When the paper was placed in
the printer, it was aligned with the wrong burst point.
After the receipts were printed, someone mindlessly burst
them along the normal locations. I have a statement that
has my address in a 4 3/4" long section, above a 3 3/4" long
section with someone else's transaction.
I have no idea why they didn't notice that there was an extra
transaction without an address at the start of the batch
and an extra address at the end.
This problem was caused by three errors: designing the form
(there is nothing pre-printed on the paper), loading the
forms, and bursting the forms.
B.J.
|
138.80 | new wrinkle to Home Equity lines | ZEN::WINSTON | Jeff Winston (Hudson, MA) | Tue Jun 09 1987 00:49 | 7 |
| I just hear a rumor that, when you open a Home Equity line with DCU,
they automatically cancel your CRT (unsecured credit line) and replace
it with your Home Equity line. Thus, you can draw down your entire
home equity line as part of normal check writing out of your checking
account (as can anyone who illicitly accesses your acct), and you no
longer may take a 'personal' loan except when secured by your house.
Does this seem right?
|
138.81 | | ULTRA::PRIBORSKY | Tony Priborsky | Tue Jun 09 1987 09:35 | 2 |
| Re: .80: No rumor, just fact. The DCU rules allow only one
open-ended credit line.
|
138.82 | | SPMFG1::CHARBONND | | Wed Jun 10 1987 10:31 | 2 |
| Does the home equity line charge less interest ? I
would expect so. That makes it right smart !
|
138.83 | | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Wed Jun 10 1987 13:29 | 4 |
| The issue is not so much lower interest as deductible interest.
Interest paid on loans secured by home equity are deductible up to the
current basis (basis = purchase price plus improvements, not current value).
|
138.84 | sometimes it's deductible | CURIE::MASSEY | | Wed Jun 10 1987 17:48 | 8 |
| re: .83 >interest paid on loans secured by home equity are deductible
>up to the current basis......
Only if the application of the loan is for:
1. Home repairs/additions
2. Education
|
138.85 | | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Wed Jun 10 1987 19:51 | 13 |
| .84 is wrong. I stand by .83.
The two items in .84 are the items which may be secured by home equity and
still be deductible even if beyond the basis. (And of course, improvements
add to the basis.)
Up to the basis, interest payments on home equity loans are deductible no
matter what the purpose.
Why do you think all this shift to home equity based loans and home equity
based credit cards just started up this year? It's a loophole in the new law.
/john
|
138.86 | DCU has struck again! | CSSE::MARGE | Eat dessert first;life is uncertain. | Wed Jun 10 1987 23:24 | 24 |
| <<< HUMAN::WRKD$:[NOTES$LIBRARY]DIGITAL.NOTE;1 >>>
-< The DEC way of working >-
================================================================================
Note 327.0 DCU has struck again! No replies
DONJON::STRONACH 17 lines 10-JUN-1987 09:20
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digital Credit Union has struck again!! I thought the folks who use DCU
would be interested in this episode. On May 18 I went to the machine in
PKO5 to do a transfer from Share 1 to Share 5 -- I took a balance prior
to the transfer from Share 1 and after the transfer to Share 5 -- when I
received my statement yesterday -- lo, and behold -- the transfer did not
happen!! I called DCU and to make a long story short -- their reply was
it's only a computer -- and YOU must take a balance prior to and after
all transfers!! Which I did.
In the meantime, money had to be taken from savings and
god only knows why they added money and applied to my loan account as I
had more than enough in my savings account.
Right now, I have a call into Anne Connell who is the manager -- I sure
would like some answers.
All I can say is, check your statements!!
|
138.87 | Home Equity Loan deductability | ZEN::WINSTON | Jeff Winston (Hudson, MA) | Wed Jun 10 1987 23:41 | 14 |
| According to my Tax Accountant (name on req)
Home equity loans, up to the amount you paid for the house minus the
current 1st mortgage balance, are deductable for any purpose. Loans
above that amount are deductable only if the application of the loan
is for:
1. Major home improvements
2. Education
3. Medical expenses
John - If, by 'current basis' you mean the purchase price minus the
first mortgage, then you are substantially correct. If you mean
the 'current market value', you are incorrect.
|
138.88 | | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Thu Jun 11 1987 02:13 | 16 |
| >John - If, by 'current basis' you mean the purchase price minus the
>first mortgage, then you are substantially correct. If you mean
>the 'current market value', you are incorrect.
Read what I said in .83. "basis = purchase price plus improvements, not current
value."
Note also that your first mortgage is a home equity loan.
Further note that if you were to refinance your home with a single 1st mortgage
greater than the current basis, the interest would not be fully deductible.
I repeat what I said in .83: Interest payments on home equity loans up to the
current basis are deductible.
/john
|
138.89 | Keep your eyes open! Check those checks! | HULK::DJPL | Do you believe in magic? | Thu Jun 11 1987 11:50 | 34 |
| When they tell you to look at your checks [drafts] when they come to you in
the mail, they aren't kidding.
I just opened up a savings account for my wife and a joint sharedraft
account. The way we have things set up, I write my wife 1 large check and
she distributes it to the bill collectors out of the joint account.
This worked well for 2 months. Yesterday we got a love note in the mail.
It said I had bounced check #140 [by about $95]. I wrote check #140, in my
account, sometime in 1980 when I first joined DCU. We investigated this
and found that my wife wrote check #140 [of the joint account] a week ago.
Why was my name on the bounce slip? She's the primary on the joint account
and she had well over $1000 more than was needed for this check!
Here's what happened. On THIS PARICULAR DRAFT, the transfer number wasn't
printed. It was on THE COPY but not on THE DRAFT. When it wound it's way
back to DCU, they hand-processed it, looked at the names on the draft and
got my badge number. Thing is, they tried to post it against my draft
account and NOT the joint account [even though BOTH names are on the check
with HER name first]. Well, they didn't even do their usual cross-transfer
attempt for overdrafts [I had LOTS saved in a U-Name-It].
They say this one is for the record books. All the rest of the checks have
the transfer number printed properly. The worst part of this is that is
was the check for my MORTGAGE that was vulcanized. The bank 'knows' of the
problem but the computers have to stop squawking at one another before the
humans can intervene and not put a [or erase the] mark on my credit record.
Eventually, they say, all the bounce charges will be rescinded [the $9 on
my account has been] or reimbursed.
Remember, check your checks!
|
138.90 | | UTRTSC::ROBERTS | TSC Netherlands | Fri Jun 12 1987 02:55 | 8 |
| About 15 years ago, a bank in England bounced a cheque on someone
when there were more than sufficient funds to cover it.
The account holder sued the bank for libel, saying that the bank
had damaged his reputation. He won.
Nigel.
|
138.91 | | LESLIE::ANDY | We come in Peace! (Shoot to kill!) | Sat Jun 13 1987 16:36 | 3 |
| Yeah ! Sue DCU, its the American Way!
:-)
|
138.92 | Copied to CEDARS::DCU for REF. | FDCV21::DIIULIO | So...System been down long? | Tue Jun 16 1987 11:56 | 12 |
|
I've extract note #138 up to reply .91 and have placed a copy of
it the DCU notes file (CEDARS::DCU). I know that maybe some of
the problems or suggestions may have been discussed in both
conferences, but some may not know of the DCU notes file.
Rich
|
138.93 | CEDARS::DCU; A Direct Path To The Chairman! | SWATT::LEEBER | YEAH...SUN SHINE! | Wed Jun 17 1987 12:10 | 29 |
| May I respectfully suggest that the issues raised here might get
more attention and (possibly) more action, if they were addressed
in the DCU notes conference over on CEDARS.
Why is the CEDARS::DCU conference better than the HUMAN::DIGITAL
conference? New DCU conference topics and replies are mailed to Mr.
Steinkrauss, chairman of the board for the DCU, each day. He is
a DEC employee (no security issue). He also sees to it that the
issues raised in the conference are addressed in the Credit Union.
Further, no names are used.
Sometimes this means a future news-letter will provide information to
meet complaints of poor information communication. Other times it may
result in a policy change, etc., etc.
Working with the DCU conference moderator and Mr. Steinkrauss, I
have established a batch process that reads the DCU conference and
mails the new entries. This is done using the VAXMAIL_NOTES.COM
file contained in the TOOLSHED conference.
The copy referred to in Reply 138.92 by FDCV21::DIIULIO was batched as
a new topic in the DCU conference to Mr. Steinkrauss today (6/17/87).
I'm sure he will find it interesting reading. {:^)>
Carl
See you all there...in the CEDARS::DCU conference (I'll try to set in
the keypad 7 definition for CEDARS::DCU). CEDARS was out of service for
a while recently (several days) but is now in service.
|
138.94 | DCU Mortgage Policy | RCKRLL::STANLEY | Tim Stanley | Thu Sep 03 1987 16:07 | 20 |
| I applied for a mortgage with DCU on August 24th.
I want to lock in the rate.
The person who wrote up the application believes
that it is not possible to lock in the rate.
I asked about this at application and recently
over the phone. No can do. Period.
Has anyone applied for a DCU mortgage since about
August 1st, 1987? Were you able to lock in before
commitment? On what date? Who wrote up your application?
Reply either here or if you prefer, to WONDER::STANLEY.
Thanks in advance for any info.
Tim Stanley
Posted to CONSUMER, REAL_ESTATE
|
138.95 | DCU <> DEC usually | VCQUAL::THOMPSON | Noter at large | Thu Sep 03 1987 16:11 | 3 |
| You might want to look at CEDARS::DCU. Hit KP7 etc.
Alfred
|
138.96 | DCU's Check Cashing Policy | FSADMN::BEKELE | Who Wrote This Stuff Anyway? | Fri Oct 21 1988 18:08 | 49 |
|
The following is posted with permission from the originator:
===============================================================================
From: CSC32::ROBBINS "An optimist is someone who tells you to cheer up when things are going his way 17-Oct-1988 1038" 17-OCT-1988 13:45:29.45
To: @SOCIAL
CC:
Subj: Information about DCU's holding of checks
I've discovered some information that I thought I would pass along.
When I went to deposit a check at DCU they told me they wouldn't
cash or deposit it without holding it for 3 days. I've deposited many
checks before and they never held them if they were under $500.
When a check is held, no money may be withdrawn against it, and no checks
will be cleared against it. When I asked what was going on they told me that
new federal regulations REQUIRED them to do this. I got a bit irrate and
talked with supervisors and was again told that the new check clearing
regulations REQUIRED them to hold all checks over $100 for a minumum of 3
days, regardless of the balance in your account.
Well... to make a long story shorter... I called DCU's main office
and got the same story, so I called the Federal Reserve Board and got a
copy of the regulation. It DOES NOT REQUIRE any minimum holding period. It
specifies a maximum holding period but leaves to each financial
institution's discretion whether checks will be held or not. After calling
DCU President's Office and talking with the person who wrote the DCU
policy, she finally admitted to me that it was a POLICY of DCU and not a
regulation. She said that they decided to implement this new policy and
in-effect blame it on new federal regulations. This policy protects DCU
at the expense of their customer's and was in no way required by the
governement.
Just thought I'd pass this along so that if they give you the same
"line" you'll know that they're full-of-it and if enough folks
make noise or choose to bank elsewhere, perhaps DCU will get the
message that unwarrented holding of local checks is not acceptable.
- Jeff
==============================================================================
Re: -.1
> You might want to look at CEDARS::DCU. Hit KP7 etc.
Could not connect to this conference: Unknown newwork object
|
138.97 | BEIRUT::DCU | CVMS::DOTEN | This was a Pizza Hut | Fri Oct 21 1988 19:37 | 8 |
| .96>
.96> > You might want to look at CEDARS::DCU. Hit KP7 etc.
.96>
.96> Could not connect to this conference: Unknown newwork object
The conference is BEIRUT::DCU.
-Glenn-
|
138.98 | | VLNVAX::RWHEELER | Laughing with the sinners | Mon Oct 24 1988 09:23 | 9 |
|
Another "goody" about the dcu -
If your a digital employee and give me a check from your
DCU account - When I deposit in my DCU checking account, I
get to see YOUR badge number included in the information
on my receipt.
/Robin
|
138.99 | Badge numbers are not secure | DENTON::AMARTIN | Alan H. Martin | Mon Oct 24 1988 09:50 | 4 |
| Re .98:
How is that a problem with DCU?
/AHM/THX
|
138.100 | | CVG::THOMPSON | Grump grump grump | Mon Oct 24 1988 09:58 | 12 |
| There is a DCU conference at BEIRUT::DCU for this kind of thing.
Digital and the DCU are not the same. DCU is not a benefit in
the way insurance is. Comments about the DCU in this conference
are not read by anyone who can do anything about it. On the
other hand comments in the DCU conference *are* read by DCU
board members and communicated to DCU management. So either
you care about fixing the 'problems' or you'll write here.
If you write about it here you are saying that you don't want
the 'problem' fixed but want to gripe anyway.
Alfred - co-moderator
|