T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
121.1 | ongoing interchange planned... | BRAT::MDAVIS | | Thu May 15 1986 08:42 | 23 |
| At the end of the program, the next "edition" was announced for
August 19. Although this doesn't fulfill the request for a
permanent interchange, I think it's fine...
I had heard Ken make comments in the past about "treating your
data with more respect" than to put it over a voice-grade line,
but this was the first time I heard him make reference to the
regulatory aspects of technology development in the voice
industry...made a lot of sense...
I also liked the reference to "be proud; be humble; don't be
arrogant"...
I was disturbed, as were other women, by the offhand comment
"Let's take the girls to dinner; I don't want to get any more
serious than that!" ... This sort of remark in the middle of
a business-related Q & A session only tends to trivialize women
and their contribution to the corporation's success.
I am looking forward to the next one!
Marge
|
121.2 | Huh? | USRCV1::CARNELLP | Fanmail from some flounder | Thu May 15 1986 19:15 | 10 |
| OK, I'll be the first hayseed from the out in the boondocks to ask:
Just what in the Sam Dickens are you talking about here? I'm assuming
that KO appeared on some kind of TV/satellite hook-up and talked
to some employees in real-time, but how about some details folks?
Like when, who, what sites, and how? Maybe I'm just dumb but I don't
remember seeing anything like this on my cable TV.
Paul.
Syracuse, NY
|
121.3 | Ken who?... | POTARU::QUODLING | It works for me.... | Thu May 15 1986 20:41 | 14 |
| re .2
There is an Internal Dec TV transmission network. I think the
thing is driven out of MK or LKG. A number of facilities have
the appropriate Satellite HArdware to connect in. I believe
it can do videoconferencing as well.
However, pity us in the boonies, (Outside the U.S.). I have
never seen K.O. in the flesh, and am only likely to do so if
I am in ML at the right time. A visit from the Top Dude to
the subsidiaries would improve moral out here no end.
q
|
121.4 | How to send (electronic) mail to Ken Olsen | FURILO::BLINN | Dr. Tom @MRO | Fri May 16 1986 00:16 | 15 |
| Pick a DECmail router, e.g., MROMTS, FLOTSM, RUGGED, etc.
There are usually several in each area. I don't know where
to find the list.
Send the mail to NM%router::MRGATE!Ken_Olsen@MLO. It will
be delivered to his DECmail, VAXmail, or All-in-1 account (I
don't know which he has, probably DECmail). I doubt that he
personally will read it -- but someone who works for him will,
and if it's important, it will get acted on.
Make sure you don't write something that would justify shooting
the messenger -- and don't just flame, if you have a complaint,
state the case calmly, and give the background justification.
Tom
|
121.5 | The Hot Line!!!!!!!!! | NMGV08::FITZGERALD | Maurice FitzGerald @JGO | Fri May 16 1986 03:58 | 21 |
| Try this:
$ PHONE
(A screen comes up)
DIR SIERRA
(A list of people logged in comes up, sometimes including the name
OLSEN)
DIAL OLSEN
............
If he types in ANSWER, you're in business.
Remarks:
1. You'd better have something to say.
2. I don't know if it's THE Olsen. (I don't have anything to say.)
Have fun :-)
MFG
|
121.6 | Don't be a nuisance. | POTARU::QUODLING | It works for me.... | Fri May 16 1986 06:06 | 16 |
| re .-1
> $ PHONE
> (A screen comes up)
> DIR SIERRA
> (A list of people logged in comes up, sometimes including the name
> OLSEN)
> DIAL OLSEN
This would surprise me as I was under the impression that Sierra
is a terminals engineering machine. There are 4 olsen's in
the Mill ( and maybe others with accounts on Mill Machines
that don't work there.) Lin, Pat or Robert Olsen are more likely
than not going to be the ones you annoy rather than K.O.
Q
|
121.7 | CORE is Ken's DECmail MTS node | HUMAN::CONKLIN | Peter Conklin | Fri May 16 1986 18:43 | 12 |
| Pick a DECmail router, e.g., DRWHO, MROMTS, FLOTSM, RUGGED, etc.
There are usually several in each area. I don't know where
to find the list.
Send the mail to NM%router::MRGATE!Ken_Olsen@CORE. It will
be delivered to his DECmail account. His secretary will give
it to him, and if it's important, it will get acted on.
Make sure you don't write something that would justify shooting
the messenger -- and don't just flame, if you have a complaint,
state the case calmly, and give the background justification.
|
121.8 | Thanks | 2LITTL::BERNSTEIN | The Spectator is a Dying Animal | Fri May 16 1986 23:05 | 8 |
| I have no complaints or flames at all, just some ideas and
suggestions about communicating with employees, which was what he
and John Sims seemed especially interested in, from the broadcast.
Thank you. I'll post the letter here, when it's finished.
Ed
|
121.9 | | RAVEN1::HEFFELFINGER | Tracey Heffelfinger | Sat May 17 1986 00:52 | 10 |
| Don't feel bad Q. It's not just the overseas people that are
in the boonies. This is the first I've heard about the broadcast.
(And I'm not likely to see KO walking around my plant either!)
(This is one of the strong points about NOTES. Its allows those
of us who are geographically separated to share some sense of community
with those of you who are "At the center of the DEC universe".)
tlh
|
121.10 | | CLT::COWAN | Ken Cowan, 381-2198 | Sat May 24 1986 16:30 | 9 |
| A while ago, KO came to ZK and gave a talk in our cafe. One of
the things he mentioned was that he doesn't use any of our equipment
(and hasn't for years). He also commented that he printed out
his electronic mail, but there was too much of it for him to deal
with.
Maybe these days a secretary deals with it all?
KC
|
121.11 | ironic enough to be correct | 2LITTL::BERNSTEIN | Every Word is the Word of God | Sat May 24 1986 17:32 | 10 |
| Did he give any reason for this? Does he think he works
better than he could with the use of computers? Keep him away from
customers! :-) Seriously, maybe some group should talk to him,
and design with him some ideal system that could convince even him
that computers can make his job easier and his time spent more
efficiently.
What does he do all day, anyway?
Ed
|
121.12 | Computers don't help managers much | HUMAN::CONKLIN | Peter Conklin | Sun May 25 1986 14:57 | 15 |
| Ed Kramer has been working on just the sort of system and software
that could make a workstation for senior executives. So someone
is working with Ken to figure out how to make computers useful to
him personally.
He spends his time working with people. One-on-one, in small groups,
in committees, and at larger meetings.
Although I am several levels below him, I find that I rarely spend
any work time using computers. I do handle my own mail, but few
of the managers above me do. I use editors/word processors to compose
documents because I write faster than I speak. Above me, there are
few documents generated over a page in length. The longer documents
that benefit from word processing are generally created at lower
levels in the organization.
|
121.13 | KO is pretty inconspicuous | HIGHFI::MICKOL | Videographer | Wed Jun 18 1986 15:00 | 14 |
| Even if you work in the Mill, the chances of seeing KO are pretty small. I
have been working here for 5 years and I think I've seen him three times.
Once, he was greeting some visitors in the (old) main lobby, another time he
was speaking before our whole Plant (used to be the Maynard MFG Plant and were
embarking on a new charter: New Product Operations). I was videotaping the
presentation and after it was over, I kept the videotape rolling and went up
and shook KO's hand and I now have a record of it. The third time, I saw him
leaving the Mill in his Ford Bronco II 4x4.
Ken (to my knowledge) never eats in the cafeteria or walks down Main Street
here in Maynard like so many other Digital employees do.
jim
|
121.14 | Slightly visible | HUMAN::CONKLIN | Peter Conklin | Thu Jun 19 1986 18:52 | 1 |
| On the other hand, KO does give blood.
|
121.15 | A Lesson in Arrogance | EXIT26::FREDRIKSEN | | Fri Jun 20 1986 17:16 | 0 |
121.16 | A Lesson in Arrogance | EXIT26::FREDRIKSEN | | Fri Jun 20 1986 17:24 | 75 |
| I have just read this topic, not having accessed the DIGITAL conference
for a while. I feel compelled to share the following with you.
I did not write it; it was distributed privately by an employee
here in Bedford, MA (which is where the DVN broadcasts emanate from).
I did, however, verify the facts. The incident and language mentioned
were used. I only edited out a couple of letters and replaced them
with "*", as I am no longer sure what the rules are around here.
The author knows that I am posting this:
A LESSON IN ARROGANCE
The president was talking to the company's employees over the corporate
video network but I got the distinct impression his remarks on
arrogance were directed at his vice-president of Sales and Services.
It was one of those sermons where the more the preacher talks about
avoiding the pitfalls, the clearer it is the preacher (or a close
associate) is in the pit.
Somehow it seemed rather arrogant just feeling the need to verbally
chastise oneself and associates as a form of preventive maintenance
against a pending onslaught of arrogance. Nonetheless, the message
was clear - we're pretty awesome but we really should eat some humble
pie. The old adage, "We're Digital and you're not", had come true
and, therefore, it wouldn't be too prudent to keep cramming it down
other people's throats.
Signal received, lesson learned, end of show. But not really, the
real lesson was about to start in, of all places, the Digital Bedford
parking lot. The lesson - companies aren't arrogant, individuals
are arrogant.
Assume you are the Vice-President of Sales and Services of the world's
second largest computer manufacturer. You have just been one of
the four featured guests on "your" own private television network
and are on your way out to your car to head for your next important
event of the day. You were well controlled in your video performance
and answered questions, addressed issues and spoke with authority.
You're something else! But what's this sh**! Your car is blocked
in by one of your own company's commuter vans. Sure you're parked
in the VANPOOL parking space, but at your facility those spaces
are available to anyone after 9AM. Boy, are you pi**ed!
After security finally gets the damn driver's a** out to move the
f___in' van, guess what? The f___in' van driver doesn't even recognize
you. An exchange follows:
"Move this van, I'm already 35 minutes late for a meeting in Merrimack
and Merrimack is 30 minutes away." This reasonable facsimile of
the VP's opening volley gives him the benefit of the doubt that
expletives were delted.
"What's wrong, can't you read! That sign says VANPOOL parking!"
Probably not the best choice of words for a humble employee addressing
his fearless leader, however, two points for honesty.
The stage is set and arrogance waits in the wings. The US sixth
fleet is positioned off the coast of Lybia and the marines are about
to land in Granada. Slowly he turns, step by step .....
"You're a f___in' smart ass! I could wipe out this VANPOOL with
one phone call! What's your name and badge number? How long have
you been with Digital? After 9AM, these spaces are available to
anyone! You can park up the hill and walk down here like everyone
else!"
In less than three minutes, it was all over. Kadaffy's two young
sons lie bleeding in the ruins and his infant daughter was dead.
It was supposed to be a surgical strike; takeout only VANPOOLS
being used to support terrorism. What was it really - it was an
abuse of power - a lesson in arrogance. VPs are human and certainly
have a right to argue with other humans about human things like
"get your f___in' van out of my face". But "I could wipe out this
VANPOOL with one phone call"? - arrogance.
|
121.17 | View the ruins of the NSD | ODIXIE::VICKERS | Don Vickers, Notes DIG member | Fri Jun 20 1986 23:25 | 14 |
| Well, it took him two or three calls to wipe out the National Sales
Desk.
It was cost reduced out of existence by a couple of air strikes and
replaced with more expensive area level telemarketing sites leaving
1-800-DIGITAL in limbo for a few months.
I wasn't involved personally or that closely but it certainly had
all the ear marks of the attitude described in .-1.
I'm still amazed at this type of attitude by a 'leader' of a fine
company.
Don
|
121.18 | free for all after 9:00? | OLORIN::SEGER | | Wed Jul 16 1986 13:57 | 15 |
| What's this stuff about van spaces being available for anyone after 9:00?
I've been riding a van for 5 years and NEVER heard that one. Periodically,
the driver has to take the van out for either service or to run an errand.
Upon returning, if anyone is in our space, it's interpretted as a dare to
block them in. Most van drivers I know ALWAYS block in cars parked in van
spots and I fully support their actions. Are people really that lazy that
they can't walk a few extra feet?
One the other hand, if this 9:00 stuff is legitimate, it might be a good idea
to tell the van people as well as the rest of company. If true, then the VP
is question certainly deserved to be upset. On the other hand, if it's not
policy, he deserved the reaction he got.
-mark
|
121.19 | Open to all after 9:00 | TOPDOC::SLOANE | Notable notes from -bs- | Wed Jul 16 1986 14:45 | 12 |
| In the Lower Thompson St. parking lot by building ML05 there are
several van parking spaces.
Signs in each space clearly say (this is from memory) "Reserved for
commuter van until 0900." [Can a mill rat correct this, if my memory
is wrong?]
I frequently go to ML for a 9:00 meeting. I usually arrive around
8:45. I have never attempted to park in the van spaces, but most
of them are already taken by cars by that time.
-bs
|
121.20 | Millrat's Parking | MILRAT::SEGAL | Len Segal | Wed Jul 16 1986 18:15 | 23 |
| Re: .19
> Signs in each space clearly say (this is from memory) "Reserved for
> commuter van until 0900." [Can a mill rat correct this, if my memory
> is wrong?]
Your memory is fine. At the Mill, this is indeed the rule, and has
been so for the past 3+ years.
Unfortunately, I have found that this appears to be an exception
rather than a rule relative to most other DEC facilities. If I
recall correctly, at PKO AND BUO the Van spaces are reserved
Forever!
I think that it only makes sense to reserve them for a specified
period of time, adn then open them up to any comers. If a van
leaves the space, or if I have to leave the Mill for any reason,
neither of us has a right to expect our space to be reserved until
we return! Any of us can walk the extra mile (few feet my foot!
I'll bet it is 1/4 mile from Lower Thompson door to end of parking
lot!), if not we can get a special exemption for the
Medical/Handicapped spaces!!!
|
121.21 | | STAR::TOPAZ | | Thu Jul 17 1986 09:04 | 7 |
| re .18:
> Are people really that lazy that they can't walk a few extra feet?
Does that include van drivers who run errands during the day?
--Mr Topaz
|
121.22 | | LYMPH::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Mon Jul 21 1986 13:49 | 16 |
| I guess I should have included a little more information about why spaces
should be reserved ALL day.
Some of the errands that van drivers go on are meetings at other sites or
for van maintenance (I know, they sometimes take them to lunch too). Anyhow,
when people get out of work, they typically walk over to the van to wait for
it to fill up and leave. If the van is not there, it causes a lot of confusion
since the first fear in someone's mind is that they got left behind (rarely, but
occasionaly happens).
Part of the reason thevan program works is that it's fairly painless to ride
one. It drops you at the door and you pick it up at its parking space. To
start making contingencies for lost spaces when the van went on an errand would
add to the complexities that already exist.
-mark
|
121.23 | where dey go? | RAJA::MERRILL | Win one for the Glypher. | Thu Aug 14 1986 12:40 | 7 |
| My guess is that all the Mill vans are parked "ALL day" at Parker
St. since the Mill spaces are 90% cars after 9:00. Could this be
Van "policy" since it might reduce congestion to start at PK and
circle past ML?
RMM
|