T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
29.1 | | PRSIS3::DTL | | Tue Apr 02 1985 09:35 | 5 |
| Hi Bob.
This issue raised up in #5 here, but without a lot of success.
Didier
|
29.2 | | SPEX::ANDY | | Tue Apr 02 1985 18:02 | 5 |
| There are reasons for that.... mail me if you want to hear a gory story.
Sorry Didier, but this file can be a little too public.
andy
|
29.3 | | PRSIS3::DTL | | Tue Apr 02 1985 19:31 | 6 |
| I agree. That's why I didn't post another story I know well...
Anyway, we can discuss about the way it (should) works.
Didier
|
29.4 | | NANOOK::ALPERT | | Wed Apr 03 1985 06:39 | 9 |
| Sorry, I didn't realize or remember that the subject was raised
previously (must be suffering from SWS burnout :-).
If anyone has any comments or tales-that-are-not-too-private to
post here, I for one would be interested in seeing them. So far
management has been receptive to my desire to relocate, but nothing
concrete has happened yet either.
Bob A.
|
29.5 | | NWG780::KOOLEN | | Wed Apr 03 1985 12:50 | 61 |
| Relocations can take a long time or short time. Managers can be
helpful or unhelpful.
There are 2 categories of relocations - domestic and international.
I gather you are interested in International which is further sub-divided
into Permanent and Temporary.
There is a Digital personnel policy (no 29 I think) on International relocation
assignments. you can get it from either country personnel dept or in US
Sandi Scanlon, Field Operations relocation manager. Local personnel in US
may not have it.
Diff between Perm and temp.
Perm.
This is where you move from one country to another and stay in the 2nd
country (one way ticket).
DEC pay your fare, removal of furniture, agent fees for renting/buying home
locally, tax orientation and tax equalisation of allowances or relocation
payments as above. You also get a miscellaneous relocation allowance, which
is to help you get set up in new country ie buy appliances, get electricity,
phone installed etc. this is 2500$ for US, for France somewhere in
range 18-20kff. You become a permanent employee of host country, but your
service elsewhere counts towards holidays and pension rights etc.
Temp.
This is where you move from home to host country for 1-3 years and then
go back to home country at end. The allowances are much more generous
than permanent but then you can't benefit from the stability of permanent
relocation, so DEC compensates for that. Allowances depend on compensation
policy, which is either host or home country. Host is where you are
paid like a local employee, but get certain allowances. Home is where you
are paid like a home employee plus certain different allowances. For
temporary assignment you need home country manager. He/she should be not
more than 2 levels below vice-president and is responsible for your reference
salary and for ensuring that you can return to home country at end of
assignment. If you can't get a home country manager, you can't have a
temp relocation. If you want to go to US it must be temp assignment for
visa reasons, so no hcm, no relocation. This happened to a friend in
DECAustralia who wanted to go to the US. he had job lined up, his manager
wouldn't let him go for a year, wouldn't help with hcm issue. he kicked
up a fuss and now his career has been shot to pieces in Oz for that reason.
So much for the statements made earlier in this file about how fair DEC is.
In general, people are reluctant to be hcms because it costs them a lot of
money (they have to pay your return expenses).
As far as international relocations are concerned, DEC generally only relocate
managers and senior technical people or people with special skills not available
locally.
If you want more info, send me mail on
SNOV12::FOBSTEST (Sydney Australia), where I'll be next week.
I'll copy didier on replies so he can post them here.
DO NOT SEND MAIL TO MY account on RHODES for next 2-3 weeks and thereafter
expect 2 week delay for replies.
Howard Perry
|
29.6 | | NANOOK::ALPERT | | Thu Apr 04 1985 07:36 | 9 |
| Thanks for the info -- actually I am looking at a domestic relocation
in the U.S. (I'm currently in Bedford, New Hampshire. The "Old Country"
is Camden, New Jersey. People who know me realize what I mean when I talk
about the "Old Country", I'm afraid here it was a bit misleading.)
If DEC won't transfer me, I do have other possibilities but I would rather not
leave the company unless there is no other alternative.
Bob A.
|
29.7 | | SPEEDY::WINALSKI | | Sun Apr 28 1985 01:18 | 15 |
| A lot depends on the managers involved. I have seen several cases where
people transferred to other projects in other groups for interest and/or
career development reasons. They were not blocked from so doing by management.
However, they did have to complete their current commitments to their current
projects before moving on.
On the other hand, I've also seen cases where a supervisor spread vicious
rumors about an individual to prevent that person from transferring out of
a particular job.
Finally, I've seen a case where a manager told an employee that the person
was not working out in the group. The manager actively helped the employee
find another organization that was a better fit.
--PSW
|
29.8 | | DREAMS::SIART | | Tue Apr 30 1985 11:23 | 14 |
|
To make a long story very short. I tried to
transfer to a new group. However things did not work
out. My manager was helpful , my supervisor was not.
Now that I stayed with the group I feel that I have
been blackballed. My senoirity level with the group
was #2 but since the attempted move I am treated like
a newcomer. Given boring projects, while my fellow
workers seem to get sent to places for meetings etc.
(sounds like I'm complaining HUH?) I mean I was treated
very fairly before the incident. What is a person to do?
( I think make the move now )
|
29.9 | | EIFFEL::WINALSKI | | Wed May 01 1985 04:36 | 6 |
| Have you discussed this with your manager (the one who was helpful)? It
could be that your supervisor has it in for you now, but on the other hand,
it just might be your turn to do the grunge work for a while. You'll never
know if you don't ask.
--PSW
|
29.10 | | PRSIS3::DTL | | Tue May 14 1985 17:22 | 7 |
| please avoid discussing too *personal* issues. I don't want to see this file
becoming a court for employees problems.
Thanks
Didier, moderator.
|
29.11 | | HERON::GUILLAUME | | Wed May 22 1985 15:15 | 13 |
| RE: International relocation
International relocation doesn't seem to be too much of a problem, except
finding a job in a foreign country where your skills are needed and not
localy available. How good it works depends a lot on how good you're able
to sell yourself. Some countries are relunctant to let their people relocate
to another country (going as far as just telling the employee that there
is not international relocation policy within DEC). But ODP should help,
and I've seen some cases where it did.
But, if moving from DEC to DEC in different countries does not change a lot
for you, don't forget your wife and kids. Not just a few relocations end
after a few months, because the family cannot stand the country or the people
any more.
|
29.12 | | PRSIS3::DTL | | Wed May 22 1985 19:09 | 5 |
| Re: .-1 Is it you Rene'?
(interesting, because Rene' Guillaume is the guy who introduced me to the
wonderful world of Notes...) :-)
|
29.13 | | MUNEIS::DEREK | | Mon Jul 29 1985 18:41 | 110 |
| I joined DEC in October last year with Information Services, User
Support in Munich, and moved to Germany with full intentions of
staying here permanently. This view may seem rash, but it was based
on the fact that my Mother is German, and I have relations here in
Germany including two brothers who settled here (being German born)
rather than in England. I do not speak German, being raised in the
U.K.
I was extremely excited in getting the job with DEC, as this was
something that I had wanted for some time. I have no children, but I
am married and have two cats. The decision to move abroad was not
taken lightly and the pro's and con's weighted at some length.
The problems started when 'attempting' to deal with the Personnel
dept., trying to make all necessary arrangements for Germany from the
U.K. was extremely difficult.
The relocation package offered by Germany consisted of; cost of travel
for myself and family, cost of furniture removals, temporary
accomodation while looking for somewhere to live (ie: hotel), misc.
expenses (paid against receipts) to DM 5,000. Cost of German lessons
for self and wife, U.K. tax advise, and the cost of two home visits
and cost of agency fees for renting of a flat.
O.K., this is generous and seems quite comprehensive, but the problems
come with the ambiguous nature of the above.
TEMPORARY ACCOMODATION - the sum of DM 3000 was allocated for
temporary hotel accomodation. Taking into account the availability
(or lack, thereof) accomodation at the time I had to pay DM 760
towards the cost of the hotel bill.
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES - I was not told what was covered by this,
other than Carpets and Curtains. I did not have a telephone installed
in the flat I rented because of cost, and on several occasions my
supervisor asked why I didn't have a phone installed. I felt that DEC
should have covered the cost of installing the telephone, but I was
told this was not the case. But, lo and behold, DEC would have
covered the cost, but nobody knew about it.
HOME VISITS WHEN KEEPING TWO HOUSEHOLDS - I owned my house in England,
and moving away meant that I had to sell it, the cost of selling my
home was not covered by the relocation package. This meant that I had
to pay quite a lot of money for agency and legal fees. Completion of
the sale of my house took place 8 months after moving here which meant
that I still had to cover the cost of my house plus the cost of living
in Germany, (which cost twice the monthly amount that I paid on my
house, for a three-roomed flat). The punch-line here is that the home
visits were valid 'ONLY IF MY WIFE WAS STILL IN ENGLAND', this,
despite the fact that I had made a commitment to settle in Germany and
sell my home etc.
FURNITURE REMOVALS - the full cost of furniture removals was covered,
including insurance. The normal penalty clause to protect DEC's
investment was included, ie: pay back a percentage of the removal
costs should you leave the company within a given period. Now
describe 'leaving the company' and equate it to the comment in the
main note '...DEC freely allows, and even encourages, people to move
within the company...', and you have: CONFUSION.
I have applied for and got a relocation back to the U.K., after
spending 11 months working for I.S. The main reason for the move is
that User Support does not offer the amount of technical involvement
that I was led to believe was available. So after being 'led-around'
the subject of training courses and my plea's for more technical tasks
also not bringing results, I sought a position that would allow me to
use my knowledge for my own and the companies benefit.
As a consequence of this move, I must pay back a percentage of the
removal costs, because 'I am leaving the company'. But, I will retain
my badge number, plus it would have been possible to transfer my
outstanding holidays to the U.K.
I thought that DEC had a 'corporate' structure, indicating that I am
relocating INTERNALLY, to take my existing skills to where they will
do the most good.
These discrepancies in the methods used by Germany personnel have
given me a very sordid view of DEC as a whole, which I am assured by
U.S. friends is not true.
There have been other items of general 'sillyness', such as not
informing International relocaties of the legal requirements, not
taking into account the fact they might not speak the language, and
will find registering in a foreign country a big problem. Supplying
relocaties with a 'Personnel Handbook' in German, which they are NOT
going to be able to read.
Perhaps I have a different concept of the function of the Personnel
Department. I feel that they are there to provide a service to
employees, both new and old. They are not an Employment Agency whose
main function is to recruit people for open slots, regardless. I also
acknowledge that this situation is not indicative of ALL Personnel
Departments.
I agree with the comment in note_5.0 that '...relocation costs the
Company a LOT of money...', and saving ANYONE'S money is worth while.
Relocation costs are incurred by the employee in most cases, not to
mention the effort and emotion often entailed with moving to a foreign
country, and a sensible advisory service ( from Personnel), would save
the company a lot of money in unnecessary relocation expenses etc.
Well, that just about covers my experience with relocating, I didn't
intend to write a book.
lqwqwqwqwqk
xdxexrxexkx
mqvqvqvqvqj
|
29.14 | | EXIT26::PERRY | | Wed Jul 31 1985 19:37 | 41 |
| Re: -.1
It seems to me that you've been done. As you intended to relocate
permanently, you should have received a permanent relocation package.
I mentioned this in an earlier response from NWG780::. The main
features of the permanent package are:
. transportation for you and your family
. removal of household goods
. tax orientation and consultancy for 1st year ie Coopers & Lybrand
prepare your tax declaration.
. re housing - what you would get if you were a host country employee
relocating internally within the host country eg fees to find flat
or legal/agents fees to sell and buy house.
. temporary living, rental car, hotel accomodation and meals .. no limit
on cost.. for 30 days, can be extended at discretion of cost centre
manager.
. miscellaneous relocation reimbursement. This is a flat rate payment
to the relocatee and is fixed by country eg in US it is $2500. When
I relocated to France in 1982 it was ca FF17000. It covers miscellaneous
expense liabilities not covered elsewhere eg phone /utility installation
or connection, purchase of electrical goods in host country.
. Tax equalisation on all allowances, expenses claimed.
I am aware that DEC Munich tend to do things differently from elsewhere,
but there is an International relocation policy and my experience is
that it is applied consistently as far as allowances and reimbursement
of relocation costs is concerned.
DEC Kaufbeuren, admittedly a separate company legally from Munich, publish
a leaflet explaining the niceties of moving to Germany, in English.
However, the employee handbook explaining holidays, mileage allowances,
company policies etc is usually written in the local language of the
country, since the vast majority of employees are recruited locally.
Also, despite the fact that DEC is a US-based company, DEC Germany is very
much a German company in many respects.
Finally, It is because DEC is a US company where the company language is
English, that you were able to get a transfer to a country whose language
you didn't speak. If you only spoke German, what chance would you
have of getting a transfer to UK or US?
Howard
|
29.15 | | MOTHER::PHILPOTT | | Thu Aug 01 1985 12:06 | 18 |
| re:-.2
Yep, sounds like you got the run around. Having moved
from Britain to the US earlier this year, I can only say
that I have had no more than minor irritations in
dealing with personnel (the main one was that they
entered my start date as the date I started in the US,
and so my leave accrued at the minimum rate, - it has
taken a long time to get the start date changed to the
day I joined the company, and I still haven't had the
leave recalculated to reflect the date, but it WILL get
sorted out). Everything else is fine.
/. Ian .\
PS they even offered to pay for language lessons so I
could learn "American English" since my native tongue is
"British English"!
|
29.16 | | EXIT26::PERRY | | Fri Aug 02 1985 11:25 | 15 |
| Re: -.1
Yes, Personnel do have problems with start dates. They put June '83, instead
of March 1980, on my visa application when they applied in Jan '84.
The visa application was rejected....then they appealed (appeals can
take up to 6 months). So it took 7 months to get the visa instead of the
alledged norm of 6-8 weeks. Apart from this glitch everything was OK
getting over....going back is a different ballgame.
Did you take up the offer of American English lessons? I didn't get
that specifically spelled out, although it's in the letter of assignment
(up to $1000), but has to be approved by cost centre manager and Personnel
manager and I don't see them agreeing. Mind you, for Brits coming to
US such a course is, in my view mandatory, since there are important
differences between the two and cultural linguistic differences as well.
|
29.17 | | EDSVAX::CRESSEY | | Sat Aug 03 1985 04:19 | 7 |
| Re .-1:
Howard, you misspelled 'cost center' again! Where did we go wrong
with you! :-)
Dave
|
29.18 | | MOTHER::PHILPOTT | | Mon Aug 05 1985 14:09 | 18 |
|
re .16:
No I didn't take them up on the offer: my parents were
with the British embassy in Washington at one time, with
the result that I spent a little over a year at an
American school. In the circumstances, I think a request
for "American" lessons would be more than a little
unlikely to succeed.
Still it's a nice thought. Incidentally having had the
experience as a child of moving to an American school, I
would strongly advise getting all the help you can for
any children brought to a foreign country: they can
suffer far worse than the adults from cultural
differences, and odd language usage.
/. Ian .\
|
29.19 | | MUTT::WAGNER | | Thu Aug 22 1985 13:05 | 10 |
| I am looking for pointers on international relocation. I have an interview
in the next two weeks for a position in Germany or England. I have not yet
read the international relocation policy (tonight's goal). Any ideas on taxes,
home in the U.S. (keep, sell), pay scale, etc, etc.
Any and all info would be appreciated.
Thanks
Merle
|
29.20 | | NANOOK::ALPERT | | Thu Aug 22 1985 15:15 | 6 |
| Since I did start this note, I thought I should report that I have
secured a position with DEC in the Old Country (New Jersey) and will be
relocating after Labor Day. Thus far my experiences on the whole
has been positive, and I don't expect any difficulties in making the
transition.
|
29.21 | | OBIWAN::DALCORSO | | Fri Aug 23 1985 14:18 | 3 |
| another happy ending. welcome back to the Garden State. you may even
get in on the tail end of a bumper crop of those famous Jersey tomatoes!
|
29.22 | | ISOLA::MOESER | | Sun Aug 25 1985 07:27 | 15 |
| I'm on International Relocation. I didn't had a big problem untill now with
my new and old cost center.
re:-2
ask yor personal department or ask for the copy at the time when you having
your interview. So far as i now is there a standard DEC international relocation
policy.( i haven't seen any differences untill now)
If you need further Information send me a mail and i will have a look in
my contract for details...
Joachim
|
29.23 | | ISOLA::MOESER | | Sun Aug 25 1985 08:41 | 4 |
| soory, i meant reply:-3 =no.19
|
29.24 | | ANGORA::EBARRETT | | Tue Jan 28 1986 10:23 | 15 |
| I am trying to relocate within the U.S. and wonder if anyone has
seen a similar situation like mine.
In short, After a formal interview, the hiring manager and personnel
felt confident they would make and offer once the Req. was signed off. The
signature loop made it to the CSM Organization and became snagged. I
realize that AUSTERITY PROGRAMS are still in effect but I don't feel comfortable
that I was told the reason for no signature was due to excess persons in
CSM (of which I am not directly a member of) when a different hiring manager
in a different CSM affiliated facility would secure a position for me if
I verbally agree to accept.
I was a new college hire last January. I see conflicting stories
that need clarification. Any offerings would be helpful.
Liz
|
29.25 | | CRETE::SHAMEL | | Tue Jan 28 1986 16:07 | 7 |
| Having friend in the CSM org, I would believe the manager who wanted you but
could not get permission to hire. The CSM org has one of the tightest freezes
I have seen - of course there may be a slip or two but for the most part
jobs are going by the wayside because qualified people can not be found in the
CSM organization and they can not hire from other groups.
|
29.26 | | ELUDOM::WINALSKI | | Wed Jan 29 1986 23:04 | 12 |
| RE: .24
It looks like you got hired to fill a req. that didn't exist yet. I would
say that neither of the two managers you mentioned actually had a req. that
they were trying to fill. Both had things they wanted to do and were trying
to cut reqs. so that they could hire people.
My own opinion is that it's bad form to start interviewing people unless
the req. for the position has been made official. This avoids quandries
for potential hires into the req. such as in .24.
--PSW
|
29.27 | | YIPPEE::BREICHNER | | Thu Jan 30 1986 03:32 | 3 |
| What is CSM ?
Fred
|
29.28 | | TIGER::EBARRETT | | Thu Jan 30 1986 08:31 | 1 |
| Computer Systems Manufacturing. It's a subset of Manufacturing Operations.
|
29.29 | | KBOMFG::POST | Veni Vedi Vinci | Thu Oct 06 1988 18:14 | 46 |
| I'm on international permanent relocation in Germany.
My relocation was short of a dissaster with a happy ending:
1. My current location (in Germany) called me on the phone and
said that they would be interesting in speaking with me about
a possible job.
2. I arranged a business meeting at the facility and also managed
to discuss the opportunity with the potential incoming manager.
We got off to an excellent start, and mutually agreed that we
should inform my previous manager that there was a job opening
in Germany and ask for permission to commence the interviewing
process.
3. My manager and my personnel manager gave the green-light for
interviewing (in writing) for a temporary international relocation.
4. The interviewing started with all parties believing everything was OK.
4. My managers' manager came back from vacation and was told of the
relocation procedures. He went off the wall, as he had not been
consulted. He was a marketing director within the Country Management
5. Unfortunately my personnel manager only informed the Personnel
director about the relocation procedure three weeks after he had given
the green light to proceed with the interviewing.
The personnel director went crazy, as he had not been consulted.
6. Both directors were exceptionally upset and alot of untrue rumors were
circulated about me. What was worse, they refused to talk to me about
anything.
7. At this time the incoming site started to get worried. What type of
trouble-maker were they hiring? The relocation procedure ground to
a complete standstill.
8. In the nerve-racking end, the incoming site finally brought me to
Germany on a PERMANENT relocation. I am very happy in my job and in
my new home. None the less the experience was excruciatingly painful.
Once on board at the new location, every thing has been smooth sailing
and there have been NO relocation problems what so ever.
|
29.30 | New Position US to UK and I'll Pay Relocation? | USCTR2::ZAPPIA | Jim -- Boston, MA USA | Thu Jul 05 1990 15:53 | 15 |
|
I am considering the possibilty of getting a short-term international
assignment from the US to an area in or near London.
If I was willing to pay my own relocation expenses would that make
things any more favorable for the hiring manager? I am not sure I
could swing it but since I am in a position to simply rent my
studio condo which is located near Boston and Northeastern
University I think I could do it relatively easier than some who
have more ties with selling their home, etc.
Has anyone any experiences with this type of reloaction?
Thanks,
- Jim
|
29.31 | | LESLIE::LESLIE | Andy Leslie | Thu Jul 05 1990 17:37 | 12 |
| Given that you're not an EC citizen, in order to get a job over here,
you'll need a work permit. DEC (or another big corporation) stand a
much better chance of arranging that than you as an individual.
It can be done, but it's hard.
In general, Personnel will frown on you paying your own relocation
costs, because it has the potential to be a situation that's actually
abuse of an employee by a Manager.
If there's a job over here that you apply for and get, then you get
relocation. If there's no job, sorry, but there's no job....
|
29.32 | | CSSE32::RHINE | A dirty mind is a terrible thing to waste | Thu Jul 05 1990 20:11 | 5 |
| When an international temporary assignment is granted, the benefits
provided to the employee cannot be negotiated away, even at the request
of the employee. In some cases, the benefits are government
regulated/required. I speak from the experience of being incoming
manager for five relocatees to the US.
|
29.33 | | MARVIN::COCKBURN | Craig Cockburn | Fri Jul 06 1990 05:37 | 28 |
| > <<< Note 29.31 by LESLIE::LESLIE "Andy Leslie" >>>
> Given that you're not an EC citizen, in order to get a job over here,
> you'll need a work permit. DEC (or another big corporation) stand a
> much better chance of arranging that than you as an individual.
You stand no chance of getting it as an individual. UK Immigration told
me about 3 months ago that individuals cannot apply for work permits.
It must be done by a company.
> In general, Personnel will frown on you paying your own relocation
> costs, because it has the potential to be a situation that's actually
> abuse of an employee by a Manager.
Not if there's no relo with the job in the first place.
> If there's a job over here that you apply for and get, then you get
> relocation. If there's no job, sorry, but there's no job....
However, if you want to move quickly and it's taking months to get
the relo associated with the job signed off, then obviously the
whole process will complete quicker if you just take the job and tell
them to scrub the relo.
Perhaps the expatriates conference would also be a good place to ask
these questions?
Craig.
|
29.34 | | LESLIE::LESLIE | Andy Leslie | Sat Jul 07 1990 03:57 | 4 |
| You can't "tell them to scrub the relo". Nice thought though.
- andy
|