T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
6.1 | | GVASA::CASELLINI | | Sat Mar 02 1985 17:02 | 16 |
| Few questions:
1. How many know this?
2. How many, of those who know this, also belive this?
3. How many of those who belive this, also put it into practice?
How do you want Digital to increase productivity, and improve its image,
when there are people, who don't answer a phone call, because it is lunch time?
Instead of hanging your nice picture on some walls in EHQ, why don't we try
to hang it somewere in the minds of those (many many) who need it?
Norbert
|
6.2 | | BZERKR::THOMPSON | | Tue Mar 05 1985 17:24 | 24 |
| I think a great many people in DEC hold this idea of customers.
I know that the engineering groups I have worked for do as well.
Many engineering groups keep in close contact with the related
DECUS SIGs. They also look forward to help for and from their
field test sites. As a Software Specialist years ago I got my
greatest satisfaction helping customers with problems.
Alas, I have to agree that, this opinion is not shared by everyone.
I remember a salesman who got at least one call a day from a
customer. For over two weeks he did not return the customers call.
Why you ask? "They just want to buy a printer and I don't have time
for it." was his answer. Can you believe it? He did not have time
to take an order! I heard him say that with my own ears or I would
not have believed it.
It only takes a few like that but we, like all companies, have too
many. We have to educate people. Japanese companies have training
for a few weeks to a few months just to teach new hires how the
company thinks. Disney World sends their new hires to a special
class for several days just to teach them that the customer (they
call them guests) is the most important part of their business.
Perhaps we should do the same?
Alfred
|
6.3 | | RHODES::PERRY | | Wed Mar 13 1985 01:32 | 13 |
| Although I have never worked directly with real customers while at DEC,
but did so before when I worked for DEC OEMs. Real customers are
those who pay DEC real money, not the imaginary kind.
I found real customers to be easier to deal with than internal customers,
as, since they have a limited supply of real money and our services cost
them a lot, they have reasonable expectations about what their money
can buy. If they do not have reasonable expectations, then it is
easier to get them to adjust them once you have gained their confidence
in your abilities.
The real customer is King.
|
6.4 | | HARE::COWAN | | Sun Mar 31 1985 19:27 | 14 |
| I've even heard the ideals expressed in .0 in a speech by KO.
I know the people I work with hold those ideals and by doing so, they
pass them on to the people around them. In particular, I call
just about every customer that sends me an SPR. Usually I have tried
to work out the problem first, so I can intelligently talk to them
about what was going wrong. By talking to them, I ask enough questions
to give them an acceptable work-around. Most of the good engineers
around me do the same.
If enough people practice these ideals, those that don't will realize that
they are in the wrong company.
KC
|
6.5 | | PRSIS3::DTL | | Mon Apr 01 1985 12:48 | 5 |
| the idea to call back at once the customer is used in the TSC here in Paris,
just to tell him that his call has been registered, so that the customer is
happy to know someone is doing something on his problem, even if we just say
hello.
|
6.6 | | EXODUS::HARROW | | Wed Apr 03 1985 14:19 | 9 |
| From an ex-customer, I **NEVER** received call-backs on the SPRs I
submitted. I would sincerely have enjoyed getting such a call-back
since I had typically put a great deal of time into preparing a GOOD(?)
SPR. Hence, I must conclude that the majority of people DON't follow
such an excellent guideline.
Hummmmm...
|
6.7 | | PRSIS3::DTL | | Thu Apr 04 1985 09:58 | 11 |
| well... When I was working in the TSC, we received the charter to read ALL
SPR's, look for an answer, then retype them in English and send them to COG(?)
for processing if no solution was found. The secretary had to send a letter
to the customer to tell him what we are doing with his SPR. When we get the
answer, six or nine months later (no flames here, please. Thank you), we
send the answer with a letter.
I believe this is still valid.
|
6.8 | | BEECH::ECKERT | | Sat Apr 06 1985 22:22 | 7 |
| re: .6, .7
When I was a customer I never received answers, much less phone calls, to
almost half of the SPRs I submitted.
- Jerry
|
6.9 | | BIGMAC::CAMPBELL | | Tue Apr 16 1985 21:47 | 23 |
| It is unfortunate that our Sales force is perceived as not being
tolerant of our customers. It is true there are tremendous horror
stories of salespeople not selling the customer what they need, of
phone calls that are ignored, of customers being convinced that they
need the particular piece of equipment that happens to be the only
piece of equipment that the salesperson is familiar with, etc.
In talking to the salespeople in the field, though, you do get a
different perspective. Many of these people are given mixed messages
from headquarters. I went to the field once to teach them about
"solution sell" and got pretty 'beat-up' for it. It seems that whil
I was told the sales people were going to be "solution-selling", no
one told that to the salespeople. The salespeople were told to make
90 day sales and to sell PRO's because that's what we got in inventory.
Solution sell takes time and PRO's are not the only piece of equipment
that solve our customers' problems.
I think it's ok to say that the salesforce doesn't give a hoot about
DEC's customers, but I think that all comments like that should be
accompanied by the statement that senior management has to set policy
that will allow the salesforce the incentive to GIVE A HOOT.
DI
|
6.10 | | PRSIS3::DTL | | Wed Apr 17 1985 10:23 | 2 |
| "give a hoot" ?
|
6.11 | | EVER11::EKLOF | | Thu Apr 18 1985 11:02 | 4 |
| "Give a hoot" is a slang idiom for "have some concern".
=Mark_E=
|
6.12 | | USWR01::HENSLEY | | Sun Jun 09 1985 16:15 | 14 |
| whether you deal directly with a customer who buys our equipment or
if your client base is the employee ain the next cubicle, the priniciple
is the same. if it were not for your customers, you would not have a
position. sometimes it seems that they only call because they have a
'problem', or to bother you with something 'trivial;.....but physicians
probably feel the same.
and, while i don't normally deal with DEC customers, DEC employees expect
me to provide a service and they ARE MY CUSTOMERS. the day i decide not
to deal with them is the day i decide to leave a service organization, and
that probably means i would be leaving DEC. not very likely !
since i am in for the long haul, i just have to remember (and sometimes be reminded) that they are why i am here.
|
6.13 | | SAUTER::SAUTER | | Thu Jun 20 1985 10:39 | 14 |
| re: .5,.6--When I was answering EDT SPRs I almost never called the customer,
but that was because I didn't have the time: we averaged one SPR a day, for
three years! Also, many of the SPRs required complex answers, which are
much better conveyed in written form.
One thing I did do was answer SPRs quickly. In the three years I worked
on EDT our average turn-around time was less than a week, and no SPR ever
took more than a couple of weeks. When I left the project the backlog was
zero. (It was also zero when I started: that was one of the conditions I
made for becoming project leader.)
Thus I think it is possible to do the right thing by the customer without
necessarily responding to each SPR with a telephone call.
John Sauter
|
6.14 | "Customer Understanding" training required. | ROYCE::SHAW | | Mon Nov 17 1986 08:36 | 43 |
| I know I have come in on this topic late, but I expect someone will
understand my view. (By the way, I've only just discovered this
Digital Note).
One of our "Resource Managers" has just taken up the task of improving
Customer Satisfaction. Great, he however has never been on the
receiving end of a REAL customers opinion. As far as I can find
out, very few of our middle management people have. Customers to
them are as defined on the wall posters that are liberally scattered
around the place.
I feel to understand how to improve customer satisfaction, one must
first understand the customer and experience him/her FIRST HAND,
not by attending DEC internal courses run by a manager who last
saw a customer 6 years ago. (It does happen here in the UK, it happened
to me 4 years ago during my induction period and the guy has only
just moved on). I really could not believe the perception some people
have of customers in DEC. Forget the ordinary understanding customer
who believes that anything can go wrong, it's the totally ignorant,
helpless and gullible guy that surprises me, didn't anybody guide
him?, or did we work on that good old maxim, "If he's dumb enough
to buy it why should we be the ones to sting him", or the real pig...
the one who HAS to find something wrong with everything and normally
swears at the DEC representative (whoever he happens to be, Sales
F.S., SWS, Support etc.).
I am afraid that before we (DEC) take up the task of satisfying
customers (if that is 100% possible) we must first elect to give
those who have taken on the task; exposure, training and finally
experience of dealing with them first hand, and then maybe.....just
maybe, they could be considered qualified to cope with the task they
have agreed to undertake. We must not fool ourselves into thinking
that customers are ALL the same as us in DEC. Outside industries
whether commercial, military, office orientated, engineering
orientated, scientific etc, all have different pressures that are
transparent to us and it is only a very naive person who believes
that the rest of the world have the "laid back", almost casual
attitide that we in DEC are lucky enough to experience in most of
our working day. It works for us, let's not assume everyone can
"identify" with it.
Brian. (ex Sevice Management-3years before DEC, Field Service
DEC, CSSE, CSS Custom Project Engineer).
|
6.15 | How to have satisfied customers | MMO01::PNELSON | Longing for Topeka | Mon Nov 17 1986 18:46 | 5 |
| Silly Brian, don't you know the way to have satisfied customers
is to sit in the district/regional/country office around a conference
table in internal meetings and talk about it?
Pat
|
6.16 | HOW DO WE DEFINE CUSTOMERS | MEMIT1::VERNAZA | | Fri Jun 10 1988 11:05 | 9 |
| IN THE MANUFACTURING QUALITY ARCHITECTUTE TO BE IMPLEMENTED WORLDWIDE
AND WHICH WILL BE ANNOUNCED THIS SUMMER,WE DEFINED CUSTOMER AS THE
RECEIVER OF PRODUCTS,PROCESSES AND SERVICES AND IS BOTH INTERNAL
AND EXTERNAL.
ALSO THE GOAL IS TO ALWAYS MEET CHANGING CUSTOMER NEEDS AND
EXPECTATIONS.
TODAY THERE IS IN DEC A DOUBLE STANDARD ON HOW WE TREAT BOTH EXTERNAL
CUSTOMERS AND EXTERNAL SUPPLIERS VS THYE INTERNAL CUSTOMERS AND
SUPPLIERS(AMONG OURSELVES).
|
6.17 | Internal & External customers | WILKIE::CORZINE | Gordie | Mon Oct 03 1988 10:26 | 30 |
| This is an interesting and illuminating exchange--seemingly timeless.
After a 20 year career providing internal MIS services for a non-DP
company, I came to DEC especially to be able to work with "real"
customers. As a Product Manager, I now do that regularly. But,
of course, the bulk of DEC's, probably any manufacturer's, people
serve internal customers.
I submit the view that the major difference is that an internal
customer is supplied by a monopoly market, where an external one
is not. But that's theoretical. My practical experience is that
if one deals with external customers the major considerations tend
to be financial (Sales, revenue, ...) and you have to (artifically)
impose metrics like Customer Sat.
Conversely, when your customer is internal, the major issues are
power--politics, who controls the budget, etc. Offending or neglecting
the wrong person can sink an otherwise promising career. [This appears
a little less true at DEC, because of the weaker heirarchy.] Its
difficult to impossible to construct a level playing field that brings
in the external market, competitively.
On the whole, I think it is more stressful to deal with external
customers. Mostly because there is nowhere to hide. And by virtue
of the fact that you are working with 'real' customers you find
you have expanded access and exposure within the company. That
carries its own risk.
One can get carried away with such subtlety. The best advice is
that everyone has a Customer, and that Customer is King.
|
6.18 | FOOD FOR THOUGHT | FSADMN::REESE | | Thu Dec 08 1988 15:05 | 24 |
| I work at the CSC in Atlanta; some folks in DEC do not hold us
in very high regard, but try sitting at the end of an 800# and
getting calls from all those customers who can't reach their
sales reps........and we are supposed to be delivering technical
telephone support. Not really bashing sales reps here.....some
customers are very determined when they want an answer YESTERDAY!
At a recent meeting our top level management passed out placards
for our cubes that read:
RULE 1:
THE CUSTOMER IS ALWAYS RIGHT!!!
RULE 2:
WHEN THE CUSTOMER IS WRONG, REFER TO RULE #1 !!!
Karen
|
6.19 | Keep up the good work, CSC; we need you out here | WKRP::CHATTERJEE | Flogged till morale improved..... | Thu Dec 08 1988 17:16 | 9 |
| I was at the CSC in Colorado Springs in late November and do not
think you guys are not appreciated. I think you do a great job
in keeping the customer happy and making 24/7 a reality. You have
a CSC fan here in CYO. So, Karen, you are not totally unappreciated
by us in the field........
And, I think the Lights Out Data Center is a place every employee
of ours needs to see. They will believe then that "Digital does
have it now".
|