[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference heron::euro_swas_ai

Title:Europe-Swas-Artificial-Intelligence
Moderator:HERON::BUCHANAN
Created:Fri Jun 03 1988
Last Modified:Thu Aug 04 1994
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:442
Total number of notes:1429

368.0. " Automated K.A." by YIPPEE::REID () Tue Sep 24 1991 18:19

    
    Hi .... can anyone suggest good recent articles or books on
    
    automated Knowledge Acquisition tools, principals, techniques etc.
    
    Who in DEC has experience at this kind of work ??
    
    - Malcolm
    
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
368.1Some ideasFASDER::MTURNERMark Turner * DTN 425-3702 * MEL4Tue Sep 24 1991 20:0512
    Some of the work done by AIRG (John McDermott' group) *might* be
    classified as automated KA, though I think they prefer different
    names, e.g. "situated computing".  You may want to contact them;
    if their work isn't what you're looking for, they'll probably be
    able to tell you what's going on in the field.
    
    There is/was some r & d at C-MU on rule generation; I think Tom
    Cooper was tracking it.
    
    NEXPERT and possibly other shells claimed to have some automated KA.
    I'm suspicious but don't have any direct experience with them.  Does
    anyone else?
368.2Some more ideasEVOAI1::RIPOLLStephane RIPOLL, EIS ParisThu Sep 26 1991 20:0519
    Malcolm,
    
    A few more references for (semi)automated KA tools & techniques :
    
      -	induction languages with rule generation :
      	. Expert-Ease, Rule-Master, Nextra, KATE
      -	model-based tools possibly with rule generation : 
      	. MORE : generates OPS5 rules for diagnosis tasks
      	. SALT : same for configuration
      -	hypertext-style tools to get an abstract expertise model from 
        interview reports : K-station (ILOG), coming from KOD 
        methodology (cf. book of Claude Vogel)
    
      -	KADS methodology with Shelley prototype (unfortunately on 
        SUN's only at this time) : modelling of expertise & 
        application design (based on problem-type identification).
    
    Hope it helps,
    -- St�phane --
368.3TSS TalkFASDER::MTURNERMark Turner * DTN 425-3702 * MEL4Fri Dec 06 1991 17:5765
    People interested in automated KA may want to contact Jude (pronounced
    same as "Judy") to get slides from this talk if they're available.
    
    
    							Mark
    	.............................................................
    
From:	FASDER::SELECT::LMOADM::TSS "JUDE' PARTRIDGE - AITC OPERATIONS, DTN 296-5758, LMO2-1/J3  03-Dec-1991 1804"  3-DEC-1991 18:27:21.00
To:	@CC$PUBLIC:MASTER.DIS
CC:	TSS
Subj:	Paul Compton, Fri 12/13, 10AM, Room 144A, GARVAN-ES1

	TITLE:		"Ripple Down Rules for Knowledge Acquisition: 
                 	 Better Than You Think"

	SPEAKER:	Paul Compton
			School of Computer Science and Engineering
			University of New South Wales
			Kensington, NSW, Australia

	DATE:		Friday, December 13, 1991

	TIME:		10:00 AM - 12 NOON

	PLACE:		LMO2, Room 144A

	HOST:		David Marques, Technical Staff Member
			AI Research Group, AI Technology Center	

	NOTE:		This presentation will *NOT* be videotaped.
	                                        --      -----

	A major problem with building expert systems is that experts 
	always communicate knowledge in a specific context. A knowledge 
	acquisition method has been developed which restricts the use of 
	knowledge to the context in which it was provided. This method, 
	"ripple down rules" allows for extremely rapid and simple knowledge 
	acquisition, where the time required to incorporate each new piece 
	of knowledge remains constant, regardless of the size of the knowledge
	base. 

	An expert system (GARVAN-ES1 -- interprets pathology laboratory 
	reports) based on this approach, and built by experts without the 
	help of a knowledge engineer, is in routine use.

	To capture context, the expert system is built as a tree with a 
	rule at each node with two branches, depending on whether the rule 
	is satisfied or not. Any new rule that is added in response to a 
	wrong interpretation is attached to the branch at which the expert 
	system terminated, thus making a new node.

	We found that no knowledge engineering was required and that 
	'ripple down rules' could be simply added to the knowledge base 
	as provided by the expert.

	This results in knowledge acquisition at least 40 times as fast 
	as that required for a conventional version of the same knowledge 
	base, with the same knowledge engineer/expert involved.

	The talk will present some technical discussion of how the knowledge 
	base is built, as well as data on the performance and growth of the 
	system in use.

	This research was sponsored in part by Digital Equipment Corporation.