| [from Arlette Gubert]
The preliminary evaluation report on the different Prolog products
is now available. You can copy it from:
YIPPEE::AI$PUBLIC:[PROLOG]evaluation_report.ps
YIPPEE::AI$PUBLIC:[PROLOG]evaluation_report.ln03
The next stage of the evaluation consists now on porting a large
internal application to the best products: IF/Prolog, Delphia Prolog
and Prolog II+.
The final report will be available by the end of february with a
summary of the comparative evaluation and the recommendations.
You are invited to send me any comments or to ask any further
questions.
Thank you for your help,
arlette.
|
| This is the current status regarding Prolog.
The technical evaluation by Arlette Gubert in Valbonne is now complete.
The recommendation to go with IF-Prolog (from Interface in Germany),
with the possible alternative to select Delphia-Prolog (from Delphia
in France). The full report is available over the net (contact Arlette
at YIPPEE::GUBERT) for details.
The US have decided to stay with Quintus because the SPG group which
used to manage the product has dropped
it and only AI marketing said that they would "pick it up", for
strategic reasons ("Digital should have a complete AI language
offering"), but due to lack of resources, they 'd rather stay with
Quintus (however poor it is) than trying to introduce a new DDS
Prolog.
I am in the process of polling my marketing counterparts in the
various European countries to see what is their preference regarding
a European or local solution. The final decision has not been made,
so you can feed your input to your marketing contact. When a decision
is reached, I will post it.
Pascal
|