T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
22.1 | Bad news ! | EVOAI1::RIPOLL | | Tue Aug 02 1988 15:06 | 29 |
| Mark,
Just read the news from the AITG.
First of all, why this budget cut?
Second, I had to do presentations, several times these last weeks, about
DIGITAL & partners A.I. products, and I obviously have to answer
differently to our customers questions, about how do our products
evolve.
Some questions I have in mind :
- may we talk about VAX DECISION EXPERT today?
- should we go on pushing OPS5 as the top DIGITAL A.I. language?
one question that often comes is about the lack of some kind
of sophisticated window environment for OPS5. will it find an
answer some day?
- what are the partner products we can best propose to our clients?
No doubt about Nexpert, but :
. what PROLOG dialect?
. what is the status of ART and K.C. today?
. what about the deals with Intellicorp for KEE?
St�phane.
|
22.2 | No specifics yet... | LARVAE::TURNER | Mark Turner | Tue Aug 02 1988 15:40 | 27 |
| Stephane,
Thanks for your reaction -- those are all good questions.
The budget cut was sudden and took everyone by surprise. It was at
least partly due to general cutbacks throughout the company; even VMS
development is being cut. The AI Engineering group, like most other
Engineering groups, is measured mainly on the revenue from the products
they develop, and this probably helps to explain the changes as well.
AI Marketing in the U.S. and Europe is working on shifting their
strategy to depend more on third party relationships, but very little
has been decided. The reason, again, is that the budget cut was so
sudden. Also, third party relationships need to be built up over time
if they're going to be successful. The only concrete news I've heard is
that we will probably re-establish the relationship with Quintus in order
to have a Prolog offering.
We will try to get news or strategy statements from Marketing, and
we'll post them here when we do.
Regards,
Mark
|
22.3 | What are our European strategy now? | OSLVS1::ARNE | Arne Skaanes | Mon Aug 08 1988 10:39 | 21 |
| What a sad message to get when returning from a nice vacation!
It seems like we are putting most of our mony on the LISP-horse? I'm
very suprised to hear OPS5 being put into maintenance mode. OPS5 is
retired to internal use only??
Well, maybe we can live with 3rd party tools and applications for a
while. My second reaction to this is: How will this decision impact the
AI- activity in Valbonne? Maybe 3rd parties has worked for AI in US,
but certanly not for Europe!!! We have had (and have) some halfhearted
cooperation with Nerun Data and Quintus. If we are going to survive in
the AI-business now, we must have some firm agreements with a selected
group of third-parties. And we in DEC set right MUST have access to the
tools and applications to be able to give resonable support.
The main reason custumers buy products from DEC is that we should be
able to give both product- and technology support. Please don't let us
dissapoint our customers again!!!!
Arne
|
22.4 | Shall I learn LISP instead? | LISVAX::VALENTE | Jo�o Valente | Mon Aug 08 1988 20:34 | 11 |
| These are realy bad news, after some flashing news from Marketing,
were it looked like we were going to have a straight plotic, with a
bunch of good products in the pipeline we finish with two.
Where are we going to with LISP and VDEEX as main products?
Are we going to be a 'Lisp-company'?
Shall we start offering Lisp instead of OPS and PROLOG,
Please keep us informed.
Thanks
Joao
|
22.5 | back to middle ages | MINNY::MANSER | | Tue Aug 09 1988 10:52 | 16 |
| I fully agree with all the replies to this topic so far.
In addition I want to emphasize the following:
- DEC (especially DEC Europe from my point of view) needs GOOD,
VERY GOOD CONTACTS WITH 3RD PARTIES ASAP!
Otherwise we will loose business because we can't offer an
Expert System Shell with real support.
- OPS5 needs to be embedded in an environment, so more people
will use it. OPS5 is a nice language/tool, but as long as
developpers have to build their own support tools around it,
it won't be very popular.
--> OPS5 V3.0 is wanted!!
Tom
|
22.6 | marketing view of the situation | BONNET::COUTIER | | Wed Aug 10 1988 18:03 | 2 |
| I screwed up and put my reply in note 23.0. For those of you interested
to get european ai marketing's view, please look at 23.0
|
22.7 | Short term finance decisions ... | CCIIS1::MERCIER | Henri Mercier,SWAS Paris | Thu Aug 25 1988 11:46 | 26 |
| Bad news...
1) Who is developping operationnal and integrated E.S using LISP ?
2) Can we afford to rely only on third parties tools ? NO,to my point
of view.
3) Revenue problems ? OPS has been priced to low,i think it is really
too cheap compared to any other (quality) tools
4) OPS with a good developpment environment is needed and will generate
revenues.Even if it's late,it's still time.
5) KBS1 & KBS2 cancellation is really a pain
6) TREILLIS/OWL becoming products ? need it soon.
7) What happened in AAAI ?
We now need (more than ever) good messages and answers to our
customers...
Keeping selling A.I
- Henri -
|
22.8 | OPS5: Good News | LARVAE::TURNER | Mark Turner | Mon Sep 12 1988 13:05 | 8 |
| There is some recent good news about OPS which I have posted in 6.1.
Regards,
Mark
|