T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
44.1 | A field for SDD please.... | KERNEL::MCGAUGHRIN | what a marvellous delivery! | Wed Jun 28 1989 16:39 | 29 |
|
Graham,
The proposal as it stands looks good, certainly an
improvement on the current screen.
I would, however like to see an extra field added, if this is possible.
There will be a need in the near future to flag whether a call has been
as a result of Vaxsimplus. It would be very helpful if a field
could be made available.
The field would be used to identify whether Vaxsimplus, initially
mailed the system manger, and prompted him to log the fault. Also,
if this being the case, then there will be a need to input the
Event Code that Vaxsimplus has called out.
Both of these are important to the development of SDD, and are required
to monitor FRU Call Outs, and ultimately the movement of parts from
logistics.
A possible suggestion .......
* Vaxsimplus (Y/N)___ Event Code ____________
Look forward to hearing from you...
Regards Ian
|
44.2 | 2P worth... | KERNEL::ROE | | Wed Jun 28 1989 19:25 | 15 |
| Graham, two thoughts,
1. What added value does line 16 give that's not given by line 18?
16*Call to be logged / Information only
18*Engineer Reqd (Yes/No/?):___ When:___________________________________
2. lines 22 and 24 are surely equivalent? I don't believe we'll call out a
FRU if it's not the most probable cause!
22*Parts Requirement FRU (P:)_____________________________________________
24*Most Probable Cause:___________________________________________________
Regards,
Mike
|
44.3 | ??????? | KERNEL::ADAMS | Venus on Remote Control | Fri Jun 30 1989 22:33 | 11 |
|
This topic has already been raised in note 37 and its replies.
The proposal therein was arrived at after consultation with Ian
Martin, and at a late stage, the Comms group.
Pete Alvis is already working those proposals with the RSDS
software developers. Has anyone approached him and/or Exceptions
re any further changes. I understand, from talking to Pete, that
making changes to what goes to the branch, is not an easy matter,
anyway.
|
44.4 | A little more info | KERNEL::ARCHER | Graham Archer Devices Diagnosis | Mon Jul 03 1989 10:20 | 12 |
|
Hi,
Thanks for the replies.
To answer the last note, yes Pete Alvis has been informed and his
views considered. The level we are aiming at is to re-write the
notify screen not modify it as it stands today.
The next reply details where we are currently at with the proposal,
Graham
|
44.5 | RSDS Notify in Detail | KERNEL::ARCHER | Graham Archer Devices Diagnosis | Mon Jul 03 1989 10:21 | 399 |
|
The following document provides a more detailed layout of the
proposed RSDS Notify screen.
I have considered everyones' inputs to come up with the new layout
and I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for them.
I would still welcome your thoughts and suggestions on this latest
version with a view to formalising the proposal in the very near future.
Regards,
Graham Archer
NEW RSDS NOTIFY LAYOUT
--------------------------------
INTRODUCTION
------------
This document defines replacement screen displays that are required to
be implemented in the RSDS Notify programme, in order to improve the
quality of the information entered and the quality of the information
passed to the Service Operation Centre.
CONSISTANT CALL NOTIFICATION DATA
---------------------------------
The proposed system will ask the Diagnosis Engineer for
information about a call which will provide a concise set of facts
about a call in a consistant format.
DATA FORMAT
-----------
This section will set out in as much detail as possible the
Screen Layouts required for data input at the CSC, and Data display at
the Service Operation Centre.
DATA INPUT
----------
The following is the layout required for the call notification
screen displayed by the RSDS Notify programme at the Diagnosis Centre.
A "*" before the Line indicates areas where data input by the Diagnosis
Engineer is expected.
DIAGNOSIS SCREEN
1 Call Logged: dd-mmm-yy at hh:mm:ss
2 RDC Log No:......... System Type:............. Serial Number:.............
3 Call type: ...
4 Contact Name:......................... Contact Phone:...............
5 CompanY Name:..............................
9 Cost Centre :... Alt CC1:... Alt CC2:...
10 Service Location :................
11 Service Phone (Day):................ (Night):................
12 Service DTN (Day):................ (Night):................
13 Assigned Engineer:..................
14*Call to be Logged or Info only (Log/Info): ....
15*Engineer Reqd (Yes/No):. When:.......................................
16*Service Operation Action:..............................................
17*Failing Device:........ Unit Number:.......... Serial Number:..........
18*Problem Summary:........................................
19*Customer Impact (CI:).... Reason:....................................
20*Skill Required (ES:)....................................
21*Parts Required (PR:)....................................
22*Trouble Statement (TS:)................................................
23*.......................................................................
24*.......................................................................
25*Most Probable Cause:...................................................
26*Frequency/Time of Failure:.............................................
27*Other Possible Causes:.................................................
28 Notification Method Phone Contct Snd? Date Time Notifier
29* Status <______>: ____________ N dd-mmm-yyyy hh:mm __________
30* Diagnosis <______>: ____________ N dd-mmm-yyyy hh:mm __________
31*CMD> _______
RECEIVED NOTIFICATION
---------------------
The following two layouts describe the data required to be
displayed at the Service Operation.
Call Information Notify
14 *****THIS NOTIFY IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY****
1 Call Logged: dd-mmm-yy at hh:mm:ss
2 RDC Log No:......... System Type:............. Serial Number:.............
5 Company Name:............................
6 Address:............................
7 ............................
8 ............................ Postcode:........
4 Contact Name:......................... Contact Phone:...............
9 Cost Centre :... Alt CC1:... Alt CC2:...
10 Service Location :...............
13 Asssigned Engineer:...............
15 Engineer Reqd (Yes/No):. When:.......................................
16 Service Operation Action:..............................................
17 Failing Device:........ Unit Number:.......... Serial Number:..........
22 Trouble Statement (TS:)................................................
23 .......................................................................
24 .......................................................................
20 Skill Required (ES:)....................................
21 Parts Required (PR:)....................................
19 Customer Impact (CI:).... Reason:......................................
25 Most Probable Cause:....................................
26 Frequency/Time of Failure:....................................
27 Other Possible Causes:....................................
32 Previous History:
33 dd-mmm-yy RDC log number Problem Summary
34 -----------+--------------+------------------------------------------
35 ..-...-.. ......... ........................................
36 " " " " " " " " " " " "
37 " " " " " " " " " " " "
38 Call passsed from Diagnosis at dd-mmm-yy hh:mm:ss
Call Closure Notify
14 ***** DIAGNOSIS COMPLETE. CALL TO BE LOGGED *****
1 Call Logged: dd-mmm-yy at hh:mm:ss
2 RDC Log No:......... System Type:............. Serial Number:.............
5 Company Name:............................
6 Address:............................
7 ............................
8 ............................ Postcode:........
4 Contact Name:......................... Contact Phone:...............
9 Cost Centre :... Alt CC1:... Alt CC2:...
10 Service Location :...............
13 Asssigned Engineer:...............
15 Engineer Reqd (Yes/No):. When:.......................................
16 Service Operation Action:..............................................
17 Failing Device:........ Unit Number:.......... Serial Number:..........
22 Trouble Statement (TS:)................................................
23 .......................................................................
24 .......................................................................
20 Skill Required (ES:)....................................
21 Parts Required (PR:)....................................
19 Customer Impact (CI:).... Reason:......................................
25 Most Probable Cause:....................................
26 Frequency/Time of Failure:....................................
27 Other Possible Causes:....................................
32 Previous History:
33 dd-mmm-yy RDC log number Problem Summary
34 -----------+--------------+------------------------------------------
35 ..-...-.. ......... ........................................
36 " " " " " " " " " " " "
37 " " " " " " " " " " " "
38 Call passsed from Diagnosis at dd-mmm-yy hh:mm:ss
LINE NUMBER DESCRIPTION
-----------------------
The following information gives further explanation of
the lines described in the RSDS notify .
Line: 1
Call Logged: dd-mmm-yy at hh:mm:ss
This line should accurately display the time the call was logged
with the response group. Currently, in the existing Notify screen
this field has the name "Time:" although no day or date is specified.
Line: 2
RDC Log No:......... System Type:............. Serial Number.............
This line is made up from three existing fields. RDC log no. comes
from the "Log Num" field. System type comes from the "CPU type" field
and Serial Number comes from the "System ID" field.
Line: 3
Branch Log no:......... Call Type:...
These fields remain unchanged from the existing RSDS notify screen.
Line: 4
Contact Name:......................... Contact Phone:...............
These fields remain unchanged from the existing RSDS notify screen.
Line: 5
Company Name:..............................
This line comes from the "Company" field in the existing notify screen.
Line: 6
Address:
This field is currently not used on the existing notify screen. The field
should accurately display the full address relevant to the Company name.
Lines 7 and 8 are reserved for this also, Line 8 has the added provision
of Post code. ( NB: Address information used to be supplied in the previous
version of RSDS.)
Line: 7 see Line: 6 Address:
Line: 8 see Line: 6 Address:
Line: 9
Cost Centre: ... Alt CC1:... Alt CC2:...
This line is made up from the following existing fields. Cost Centre
is derived from the "Serv CC:" field. Alt CC1 and Alt CC2 remain
unchanged from their use in the existing notify screen.
Line: 10
Service Location
This line is new. It identifies the town that the Service Operation
resides, i.e. Basingstoke, London, Warrington etc. This info could
be derived for the Cost Centre field.
Line: 11
Service Phone (Day):................ (Night):................
This line relates to fields used in the existing notify screen.
Service Phone replaces the text "Br Phone" in the existing notify
screen.
Line: 12
Service DTN (Day):................ (Night):................
Service DTN replaces the text "BR DTN" in the existing notify screen.
Line: 13
Assigned Engineer: ..................
This line remains unchanged from the existing notify screen.
Line: 14
Call to be Logged or Info only (Log/Info):....
This line is new. This line will be completed by the diagnosis
engineer. The response can either be "Log" or "Info". This line
will appear differently when recieved at the Service Operation.
The purpose of this line is to inform the Service Operation whether
the Diagnosis is complete, or whether it is for informational
purposes only.When recieved at the Service Location the first line
of the Notify will clearly state whether the Notify is giving Diagnosis
or Status Information.
Line: 15
Engineer required (Yes/NO):. When:.......................................
This line remains unchanged from the existing notify screen.
Line: 16
Service Operation Action
This line replaces the "Branch Action" field. Its meaning remains unchanged.
Line: 17
Failing device:........ Unit Number:..........Serial number..........
This line is changed from the existing Notify screen. Currently this
field has the format "Fail Device: sys - Is Not: ". The new line has
three fields to be completed by the diagnosis engineer.
Line: 18
Problem Summary
This line remains unchanged from the existing notify screen.
It is also used as a history field, see line 31.
Line: 19
Customer Impact (CI:).... Reason:......................................
This line is new. Its purpose is to allow the Diagnosis engineer to
provide the level of Customer impact, (High,Med,Low) and the reason why
this is so.
Line: 20
Skill Required (ES:)....................................
This line is new. Its purpose is to allow the Diagnosis engineer to
provide the Technical skill level of the Engineer required to attend to
the Call.
Line: 21
Parts Required (PR:)....................................
This line is new. Its purpose is to allow the Diagnosis engineer to
provide Part numbers or the type of Spares kit Required to remedy the fault.
Line: 22
Trouble Statement (TS:)................................................
This field replaces the "Technical Findings" field currently in use.
Its purpose is to allow for accurate trouble statement information to be
entered.
Line: 23 See Line: 22
Line: 24 See Line: 22
Line: 25
Most Probable Cause.
This line remains unchanged from the existing notify screen.
Line: 26
Frequency/Time of Failure:
This line remains unchanged from the existing notify screen.
Line: 27
Other Possible Causes
This line remains unchanged from the existing notify screen.
Line: 28
Notification Method phone contct snd? Data time Notifier
This line and functionality remain unchanged.
Line: 29
Status <______> _____________ N dd-mmm-yy hh:mm __________
This line and functionality remain unchanged.
Line: 30
Diagnosis <______> _____________ N dd-mmm-yy hh:mm __________
This line and functionality remain unchanged.
Line: 31
CMD>
This line and functionality remain unchanged.
Lines 32-37
Previous History
These lines are changed from the existing Notify received by the Service
Location. The new Notify will not only include up to three previous
calls identified by the Problem Summary,(current situation), but will
also list the date the call was logged together with the RSDS log number.
Line 38
Call Passed from Diagnosis at dd-mmm-yy hh:mm:ss
This line is new. It signals the end of the notify text and specifys
the time the call was handed over from the CSC to the Service Location.
Reference
---------
An example of the current RSDS notify received at the branch is
included here for reference purposes.
%%%%%%%%%% DIGITAL DIAGNOSTIC CENTER 30-JUN-1989 12:58 %%%%%%%%%%
Diagnosis Notification, sent by: WIBREW
Log Num : R64826 Serv CC: 7A3 Alt CC1: Alt CC2:
Branch Log : System ID: 00366 CPU Type: 1170
Link Log Num : R64826 Call Type: CM Maint Serv: Time: 11:39
Contact Name : PHILIP GRANT Contact Phone : 44-325-469131X201
Company : FARMWAYS City: DARLINGTON
Br Phone(Day): 44-532-588154X2220 (Night): 44-256-57133
Br DTN (DAY) : 7845-2220 (Night):
Passed to : Assigned Engineer: WIBREW
Prob Summary: CPU CACHE and RA81 DU0
Engineer Reqd (Y/N/?): Y When : ASAP
Branch Action: Please vcall cust with eta
Fail Device : CPU - Is Not:
Frequency/Time of Failure: during the night
Technical Findings: CI: BIG, TS: system crash and cache dissabled on reboot
suspect M8143/M8144 CPU, also T4 and resrv inst traps, Ra81 Du0 went offline
and CMD timouts, also looks like some corrupt files on disk
Probable Cause: 11/70 cpu problem
Other Causes:
Previous History:
LA36 SN:WFD7536 NOT WORKING
RM03 DR0 & DR1 BOTH SHOWING 1 ERROR
|
44.6 | some further thoughts | KERNEL::WIBREW | | Mon Jul 03 1989 23:19 | 11 |
|
The DIAGNOSIS SCREEN should be of a size that it can be displayed
on a VT screen in full, the proposed format looks like it may be
a little too large to fit.
It would make it a whole lot easier if the layout of customer
and branch details were in the same format as the DDC>INFO screen,
at the moment its all too easy to contact the branch when you really
wanted to contact the customer.
Steve W...
|
44.7 | In time, all things are possible. | KERNEL::ADAMS | Venus on Remote Control | Tue Jul 04 1989 10:32 | 11 |
|
A note on percieved timescales for RSDS developement.
From ATS to the current (ATS based ) Notify = 2 years approx.
Today + 2 years = Beyond the RSDS lifetime.
i.e. By then, new call handling systems will be in place, hopefully
combining RSDS/CFSU/CTSC/CHAMP/SMART into one universal system used
throughout the company.
|