| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 23.1 | **** RDC AND THE "FUTURE" !! **** | KERNEL::GARNETT | | Mon Apr 03 1989 02:40 | 17 |
| I AGREE WITH "ALL" OF THEO'S COMMENTS (THAT MAKES A PLEASANT
CHANGE.....DOESN'T IT !!!). OUR CURRENT 24 HOUR SHIFT PLUS FILLING
THE GAPS DUE TO MANPOWER SHORTAGES MAKE EXCESSIVE DEMANDS ON OUR
"FREE TIME".
THE NEW 16 HOUR SHIFT IS ALMOST UNWORKABLE WITHOUT EVEN MORE
DEMANDS ON OUR "FREE TIME". I BELIEVE THE 24 HOUR SHIFT HAS GOT
TO RETURN TO A SIMILAR SHIFT TO THE OLD 45% SHIFT BUT WITH MODS
THAT WONT HURT THE "HIGH MORTGAGE" PAYERS (LEAVE THE PREMIUM AROUND
58%).
I LIKE THE IDEA OF A FRIDAY EVENING AT THE "ROMANS..SILCHESTER",I'M
GLAD YOU SUGGESTED IT....THEO !!!!
NIGE
|
| 23.2 | I agree(as always) | KERNEL::EDMUNDS | | Tue Apr 04 1989 23:25 | 21 |
|
Hello Nige Sir.
Hows the nights going?
I agree with Nige-because he's a T7.5,and I'm basicaly an agreeable
kind of chap.
Except I dont think that the 16 hour shift is unworkable,it just
means lots-a-luverly overtime for those of us that dont like the
wife!
Seriously though,we have not really seen the impact of a devices
shift on our workload yet....though I'm sure most of us expect it
to increase,due to less systems people on evenings,and possibly
at the weekend.
I think that opinions and idea's on the possibilty of a new shift
system would be very useful,the single shift idea seems very attr-
-active.
Also I would just like to mention that Nigel's choice of venue has
nothing to do with the fact that he can walk home from there!
Steve T(ask Ken Robb)
|
| 23.3 | T100 (HEX) | KERNEL::BRAINE | | Tue Apr 04 1989 23:45 | 9 |
| I thought it only right and proper to join the notes file, and put
forward my constructive thoughts and/or criticisms at this point.
What a wonderful forum this is! As an aid to ironing out the wrinkles
of the shift system etc,I feel that we should do our best to contribute.
So after careful analysis of call flows I'd like to make the following
suggestion:
Why not put 4 devices people on at the weekend, at least
they'll be able to play Bridge during the long hours.
|
| 23.4 | OOPS! | KERNEL::BRAINE | | Tue Apr 04 1989 23:47 | 2 |
| BEFORE you all tell me.......T100 (BIN)
|
| 23.5 | | KERNEL::WRIGHTON | Trigger | Thu Apr 13 1989 10:02 | 11 |
|
I heard on the radio this morning that Trevor Francis , manager
of Queens Park Rangers FC had suggested that his players wives should
have their babies induced so as to fit with the clubs league and
cup schedules . He had already fined one player two weeks wages
for attending the birth of his child instead of going to training.
I wonder if such a scheme could work here :-)
Dave W
|
| 23.6 | HUH?? | KERNEL::HUTCHINGS | Insert witty comment here | Thu Apr 13 1989 10:36 | 3 |
| Good Idea...!!
Have babies between logging calls...could catch on you know..!!
|
| 23.7 | larger than systems or devices or ... | KERNEL::WOODWARD | If you've got an itch, scratch it | Tue Apr 18 1989 09:10 | 24 |
| FLAME ON
Why do all the teams in the CSG need to do their own thing with
shift/overtime/.....?
Where is a coherent policy to cover the complete Group ?
When will we do something to rationalise the mess that has been
brewing for some time with all parts of the CSG going their own
way, claiming their own rates and potentially not offering the service
the customer requires/pays for ?
FLAME OFF
Up in this corner, where life passes by at a more relaxed pace (cos
we're so efficient at our jobs of course ;-) ) we are also guilty
of wanting to sort out our own shifts etc. However, this issue seems
too fundamental to the operation of the CSG as a whole to not address
the Group requirements.
How can this be done?
Steve (I feel inquisitive today)
|
| 23.8 | *** WHEELS WITHIN WHEELS ??? *** | KERNEL::GARNETT | | Tue Apr 18 1989 09:37 | 9 |
| I AGREE STEVE....YOU COULD HAVE BEEN MISLED IN TO THINKING THAT
THE "TREND" HAD BEEN WELL ESTABLISHED BY RDC HAVING WORKED "24 HOUR"
SHIFTS FOR SOME 10+ YEARS.
I OFTEN WONDER WHY WE JUST GO ON RE-INVENTING THE WHEEL AND CONSISTENLY
FINISHING UP WITH YET ANOTHER "SQUARE ONE" !!!
NIGE
|
| 23.9 | | KERNEL::WRIGHTON | No dump? No errlog? No chance! | Fri Jul 28 1995 10:23 | 34 |
|
Subj: Modifications to BABAGI class since: 25-JUL-1995 01:15:30.11
Directory BABAGI::LCA:[SPECS]
RZ29B.DIR;1 1/16 19-JUL-1995
10:37:56.00
TEMP.DIR;1 1/16 26-JUL-1995
12:58:53.00
Directory BABAGI::LCA:[SPECS.RZ29B]
MODEPC.EXE;3 62/64 21-JUL-1995
11:25:58.00
MODEVMS5.EXE;8 130/144 21-JUL-1995
11:49:29.00
MODEVMS6.EXE;6 129/144 20-JUL-1995
11:35:26.00
MODE_ALPHAVMS.EXE;1 28/32 25-JUL-1995
15:42:35.00
SCU.;2 2960/2960 20-JUL-1995
14:42:03.00
SOLUTION.HLP;7 10/16 21-JUL-1995
11:43:08.00
The following files for BABAGI were deleted:
BABAGI::LCA:[SPECS.RZ29B]MODEPC.EXE;2
BABAGI::LCA:[SPECS.RZ29B]MODEVMS5.EXE;7
BABAGI::LCA:[SPECS.RZ29B]MODEVMS6.EXE;5
BABAGI::LCA:[SPECS.RZ29B]SCU.;1
BABAGI::LCA:[SPECS.RZ29B]SOLUTION.HLP;6
|
| 23.10 | | KERNEL::WRIGHTON | No dump? No errlog? No chance! | Fri Jul 28 1995 10:24 | 11 |
| Subj: Modifications to CXDOCS class since: 14-JUL-1995 01:24:09.17
Directory CXDOCS::PROD$:[PUBLIC.STORAGE_WORKS]
B259.SRC;2 1564/1566 19-JUL-1995
11:34:37.00
EK-HS1CP-IG-B01A1.JOU;1 0/3 26-JUL-1995
05:57:02.00
|