T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
11.1 | Publish and be damned | KERNEL::BROOKER | | Wed Mar 08 1989 15:04 | 4 |
|
See 5.12
|
11.2 | I did | KERNEL::SCOTT | boy racer | Wed Mar 08 1989 16:18 | 8 |
| That's why this one's here. We should keep that note to discuss
the serious issue of smoking and use this one to complain about
notes getting hidden or deleted. If we use note 5 to complain of
censorship the real issue, ie smoking, won't get the attention
it deserves. I agree that the notes shouldn't have been hidden
but would prefer to argue the toss about it here rather than there.
Roland
|
11.3 | (.,;!) | KERNEL::ANTHONY | | Wed Mar 08 1989 20:33 | 11 |
| I can stand SHOUTING,I can stand being ridiculed,I can stand being
attacked verbally,the od misspelled word or missspacebar.But what
I really hate are those one or two noters that insist,on NOT leaving,
spaces after punctuation marks.This makes,the note,very,very,difficult
to read.Please,please,can we have spces aftr pnctn.Ar we tht shrt
of dsk spce?
I feel better now...
b
|
11.4 | I have so much to say and no-one to listen | KERNEL::BROOKER | | Thu Mar 09 1989 07:59 | 8 |
|
Perhaps it's because we've all be programmed to deliver an
entire brain dump in the space of 3 lines. This often means
that just as we're getting to the heart of the matter, we ru
|
11.5 | MAIL DISCUSSION. | KERNEL::MOUNTFORD | | Thu Mar 09 1989 11:24 | 27 |
| I see Helen has now accessed this conference.Might it now be a good
time to open a discussion on whether to use this medium for secretarial
mail, as per my earlier mail message:-
*********************
From: KERNEL::MOUNTFORD 2-MAR-1989 10:06
To: @POST:SYSTEMS,@POST:COMMS,@POST:DEVICES,@POST:CSG_SEC,MOUNTFORD
Subj: MAIL DISTRIBUTION
A suggestion has been made,that we use the new NOTESFILE conference
as a destination for secretarial mail.This would allow users to access the
mail at will without duplication in each account,& would allow for deletion
at a suitable time,or not,as the case may be.
It is easy for anybody to extract the file if they need a personal copy.
Are there any objections to this being implemented?
It also saves an awful lot of disk space,more room for notifies?
Richard.
Richard.
|
11.6 | | KERNEL::WRIGHTON | Trigger | Thu Mar 09 1989 11:58 | 14 |
|
Yes , by all means have mail routed here ..... but , make sure that
all the people on the list are notified that there is new mail to
read .
My concern is that important mail may go unread simply because
not everyone will read avery not in this conference every day .
Therefore , I would suggest that the mail is sent to all users AND
to the notesfile , allowing the users to read and delete the mail
and know that a copy is still available for reference purposes .
Dave W
|
11.7 | Ban Dads, OK? | KERNEL::BARTLEY | | Thu Mar 09 1989 21:41 | 12 |
| With regard to note 2.20 -
There are fathers who abuse their position as father. Does it
therefore follow that we should abandon the role of father?
There are people in every walk of life that abuse their privileges
and authority. But that doesn't invalidate the functions they are
supposed to perform.
So yes Clive, you could abuse your position as moderator, but that
is not a comment on the validity of censorship; it's a comment on
the moderator.
|
11.8 | MAIL DUMP... | KERNEL::MOUNTFORD | | Thu Mar 09 1989 23:17 | 8 |
| I have started adding mail to note 4.I hope this will allow you
folks with "quota exceeded" messages, to purge some of the less
needed mail.You will get all the mail as normal from secretaries,
but I will try & keep up by placing it here, or perhaps one of the
other mods will.
Richard.
|
11.9 | In reply to 11.7 | KERNEL::BROOKER | | Fri Mar 10 1989 10:47 | 26 |
|
Theo,
Please. Spare me the emotive "snatching the baby from the mothers
loving arms" arguments. However, I think everyone is aware of
reported cases of obscene child abuse where the common consensus
of opinion would be to remove the ability of fatherhood from the
offender. But that is always after the fact, who would consider
themselves worthy to make such a judgement before the occurrence.
Very few of us are vetted and found deserving of parenthood prior
to the event.
All censorship is an abuse of power or position, since there will
always be an opposing point of view. The dilemma presented to those
who defend censorship per se is that since the "offending" item
has been censored they cannot have seen it and can therefore make
no judgement on the value of the censorship, except to affirm
their trust in the censor.
Your faith in those in positions of authority is commendable, speaking
that is as one in a position of authority.
A co-moderator.
|
11.10 | ANOTHER POINTER | KERNEL::MOUNTFORD | | Fri Mar 10 1989 18:15 | 10 |
|
YET ANOTHER NEW CONFERENCE
--------------------------
Well in fact they started before this one.
Mail Chris Hall,Stewart Taylor or Helen Cory for membership:
Kernel::Projects_and_Ideas_Forum
|
11.11 | BEAGLE::RDC | KERNEL::MOUNTFORD | | Wed Apr 12 1989 11:41 | 10 |
|
A few conference pointers that might be useful
BEAGLE::RDC Intended for people working in RDC centres.
Hit keypad 7 to add entry to your notebook
Richard
|
11.12 | SEDSWS::FS_INSTALLS | KERNEL::MOUNTFORD | | Wed Apr 12 1989 11:44 | 8 |
| Yet another goodie:
SEDSWS::FS_INSTALLS Mostly for installation engineers but there
may be some goodies.
Hit keypad 7 to add entry to your notebook.
Richard
|
11.13 | EUROPEAN MEMBER. | KERNEL::MOUNTFORD | | Thu Apr 13 1989 08:43 | 8 |
| We now have our first European member in this conference. Harrie
van der Zee, who moderates the RDC notes conference in Valbonne
(France).
We should be able to learn alot about each other's problems with
1992 just around the corner.
Welcome.
|
11.14 | | KERNEL::MOUNTFORD | | Tue Oct 31 1989 14:38 | 45 |
|
OUR DREAM
"THE COMPANY WE WANT TO BE"
1- A company that attracts the best people: that is - bright, energetic
people who are born team players, who thrive on freedom and
challenges, and who are passionate about the quality of their work.
2- A company where managers coach their people to learn from their
experiences and actively encourage them to develop their skills and
knowledge fully.
3- A company where managers urge their people to take ownership of
their work and reward them for their creativity, competence and
productivity.
4- A company where the direction and priorities are clear to everyone
and where responsibility and authority is delegated to those closest
to the customer.
5- A company whose customers feel part of the family because of our
concern for their success, our willingness to serve them and always
do that little bit more, and our ability to deliver.
6- A company that uses a flexible, dynamic approach to ensure an optimal
match between its structure and evolving needs of its customers.
7- A company that is known as its own reference site because it uses its
superior technology and knowledge effectively in its own
organsiation.
8- A company of global size where people work enthusiastically in small
groups which are networked together to take full advantage of the
benefits of its large size and which allows seamless coordination of
large scale activities to their own and their customers' benefit.
9- A company where evryone can make a difference, because people can
trust each other and managers empower their people.
10- A company people are proud of and where they act as if it were their
own company.
European Management Team,
Februrary, 1989
|
11.15 | Listings have moved | KERNEL::PETTET | Norm Pettet CSC Basingstoke | Wed Dec 20 1989 11:36 | 14 |
| 00069 20-DEC-1989 09:11 V5.2 sources moved again!!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Folks,
The V5.2 sources have now been allocated a permanent home on the Kernel
cluster, The disk that they are on is managed by Jeff Winn of the Product and
technology Group. If you require access to them then please contact Jeff.
Regards
Mark Farrow-Smith
|
11.16 | Merry Christmas | KERNEL::PETTET | Norm Pettet CSC Basingstoke | Wed Dec 20 1989 14:04 | 15 |
| From: KERNEL::GARNETT "20-Dec-1989 1310" 20-DEC-1989 13:18:56.24
To: @POST:SYSTEMS
CC:
Subj: UNIT MEETING
HI FOLKS,
TO REMIND YOU OF THE MEETING TONIGHT AT 17:00 IN THE UPSTAIRS
CONFERENCE ROOM.....UNFORTUNATLY THERE WONT BE A BUFFET BUT YOU HAVE
GOT DOUBLEBUBBLE FOR WORKING OVER THE XMAS PERIOD.
REGARDS
NIGE
|
11.17 | Atomated Rotas. | KERNEL::MOUNTFORD | | Mon Jul 16 1990 17:09 | 15 |
| Two questions that have arisen in the last few weeks. Firtsly how
do people feel about an automated rota? I feel this needs to be
done for a number of reasons & I'm sure people can add other reasons.
Firstly to relieve Brian of the time taken to update it every week,
with leave, training manpower etc. Secondly that other people need
access to it, rather than shifting a bulk of paper around, ie Janet.
If she is to schedule training she neds to know quickly availabilty
of personnel, whether they are on nights etc, also to book leave.
I have no idea who might be able to produce such a package but if
it were automated it could presumably be used by any group in the
building. Flags could be used to warn of minimum manpower in any
week etc etc.
Any comments, suggestions?
|
11.18 | | KERNEL::MOUNTFORD | | Mon Jul 16 1990 17:40 | 10 |
| My second question was that of duplication. How do people feel about
each member receiving a training manual? I have heard many people
voicing opinions as to the waste in distributing to each member.
If there is agreement I could let training know that only x number
of copies need be shipped.
Doing our little bit for the enviroment, any other publications
that we could cut down on?
Richard.
|
11.19 | guidelines | KERNEL::PETTET | Norm Pettet CSC Basingstoke | Tue Dec 11 1990 09:14 | 35 |
| From: KERNEL::SCUFFHAM "I do a lot of work for charity" 11-DEC-1990 08:00:03.16
To: PETTET
CC:
Subj: fyi- ta's
From: KERNEL::SCUFFHAM "I do a lot of work for charity" 11-DEC-1990 07:57:35.77
To: @CCD LINEHAN
CC: SCUFFHAM
Subj: ta on rsds
Chaps,
Norm Pettet has asked that when we open a technical assistance (ta)
call on RSDS can we make sure that we try and log it against the
serial number of the machine.
The reasons being:
1) If systems diagnosis need to dial in- all the details are there.
2) It enables the call to be entered into the history of the system.
If an engineer requires 'general help' and does not have the serial
number available, we can log it against a MESSAGE.
Please try and insist the engineer gives you the serial number. If
you get one who gets tough give Kev or me a call!
Thanks a lot,
Tom
|
11.20 | | KERNEL::MOUNTFORD | | Fri Jan 04 1991 16:34 | 9 |
|
I just discovered a useful feature for continuous status of calls.
For those interested IDL> sta/call=sys/con will show only systems
calls and elliminate all the other call types. I can't get it to
include more than one call type however ie sys, em and mem.
PS also useful for bugcheck desk /call=bug....
Richard
|
11.21 | Keyword creation privilege. | KERNEL::MOUNTFORD | | Thu Jan 24 1991 15:54 | 4 |
| I have lifted the restriction on creation of keywords, if anybody
needs the privilege let me know.
Richard.
|