| Title: | LSM |
| Moderator: | SMURF::SHIDERLY |
| Created: | Mon Jan 17 1994 |
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 803 |
| Total number of notes: | 2852 |
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 537.1 | From only one to multiple ... | BACHUS::DEVOS | Manu Devos DEC/SI Brussels 856-7539 | Wed Jan 24 1996 14:01 | 40 |
| 537.2 | ASE has diskgroup requirements. | NETRIX::"[email protected]" | Steve Hancock | Fri Jan 26 1996 14:37 | 13 |
| 537.3 | LABC::RU | Thu May 29 1997 19:52 | 5 | ||
Is there any disk IO advantage by putting all disks in
rootdg compared to split them into multiple disk groups?
Jason
| |||||
| 537.4 | KITCHE::schott | Eric R. Schott USG Product Management | Thu May 29 1997 23:08 | 11 | |
> > Is there any disk IO advantage by putting all disks in > rootdg compared to split them into multiple disk groups? > from a performance view, no...from a mgmt view, it may be easier to segregate the disks if you have a lot of them. You also need to use diskgroups for cluster services, or if you plan to import/export them. | |||||