T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
903.1 | See the release notes | WRKSYS::ERB | | Fri May 16 1997 15:56 | 3 |
| This is all explained in the release notes that come with VMS.
-Stu-
|
903.2 | Thanks Stu but as always I want more. | KERNEL::TOYNTONA | | Mon May 19 1997 13:15 | 14 |
| Re -1
I have checked the release notes and all it says is that the built in
SCSI controller will be bumped to the last letter i.e. PKC if 2
additional controllers are added. What I wanted to know is if you had
say 1 SCSI controller in primary PCI slot, 1 SCSI controller in a
secondary PCI slot and 1 SCSI controller in an EISA slot which would be
PKA PKB and PKC, obviously the built in would be PKD. Also if you have
2 SCSI controllers in primary PCI slots which gets the lower letter the
one with the highest or lowest slot number.
All the best
Andy Toynton
|
903.3 | for example.. | WRKSYS::LAU | | Tue May 20 1997 13:29 | 14 |
| The numbering/order of SCSI controllers (the on-board is always pka)
is shown in the following example. Assuming you have controlloers in
both primary and secondary slots.
pci-11 kzpaa pkd
pci-12 kzpba pke
pci-13 ----
pci-1 kzpaa pkb
pci-2 de500
pci-3 kzpba pkc
Paul
|
903.4 | Re -1 Close but no coconut. | KERNEL::TOYNTONA | | Thu May 29 1997 12:12 | 13 |
| Re -1
This is obviously wrong as VMS always pushes the built in controller to
the last letter ie PKC with 2 additional SCSI controllers installed.
On that basis is the rest of the information correct or does VMS
letter the SCSI channels starting with the highest PCI slot numbers and
where do EISA and ISA controllers fit in lower or higher lettered than
the PCI slots
All the best
Andy Toynton.
|