T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
840.1 | Well still no progress at Dyno | JALOPY::CUTLER | | Fri Feb 14 1997 16:02 | 13 |
| Well I called the CSC, the person on the other end and I agreed that it was
a flow control problem between the two systems. He suggested that I lower the
baud rate down on the console to 4800 or 2400 baud. I tried, but it kept locking
up on me. I couldn't even log in as a VMS user. I'm so frustrated right now,
does anyone know what is going on? What am I doing wrong, any suggestions. By
monday I'm going to need an engineer on line with me, while I'm at the customer
site. But, I'm hoping that it's not going to have to go that far, if someone can
give me some other suggestions of what to try? The customer has now delayed
installing the remaining 15 systems because of this issue, any suggestions/help
would be greatly appreciated.
Rick C.
|
840.2 | XON/XOFF to high value | UTOPIE::OETTL | hide bug until worst time | Fri Feb 14 1997 18:13 | 5 |
| You could try to increase the XON/XOFF threshold on the terminal.
This did help me at a site where I installed a Sable and had similar problems.
�tzi
|
840.3 | What parameter is that? | JALOPY::CUTLER | | Sat Feb 15 1997 05:49 | 6 |
| Otzi,
Are you talking about the (I think this is the name), ALTALARM Sysgen
parameter?
Rick
|
840.4 | | UTOPIE::OETTL | hide bug until worst time | Mon Feb 17 1997 15:20 | 9 |
| Hi,
no, I meant the communication setup of the terminal(emulation).
On the VT-series terminals you can change flow control settings in the
communications menu.
�tzi
|
840.5 | Not using VT Terminals... Problem fixed | JALOPY::CUTLER | | Sun Feb 23 1997 06:48 | 16 |
| Otzi,
They're not using VT terminals so that was not an option. We finally got the
systems to stop locking up. I ended up having to "downgrade" the firmware to the
version that was on the system that was not locking up (see my original note for
what version that is). I think (not sure) that there was a problem between the
version of the OS they were using (Openvms 6.2-1h2) and the firmware. Systems
orginally shipped to the customer with OpenVMS 6.2-1h3, but the customers
applications had been ported on 6.2-1h2 and for some reason, the customer just
wanted to "duplicate" that disk and distribute on all systems (they're legal,
they purchased all licenses). So, maybe if they had stuck with 6.2-1h3, there
may have been no issues with the console. But, bottom line is we're all set. I
doubt if they will ever upgrade the OS (and therefore may have the need to
upgrade firmware), as these are the type of systems, they put in and let run.
Rick
|