T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
371.1 | More old articles (missing new UNIX articles) | KNUT2::THIEL | | Wed Apr 09 1997 11:38 | 24 |
| I'm not sure this is the best place to mention Unix article and patch
problems, anyone know of a better place?
The article below dates to : 7-MAY-1996 !!! (PWUNIX_ECO450F)
thanks,
Tim.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 1997 3:12 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Tim Thiel
Subject: ITS not up to date
Hi Tim
I don't know if you have received my email about the DUpatches? As another
example about the fact the ITS is not up to date is the ECO db which
doesn't have PWUNIX_ECO550F (only PWUNIX_ECO450F = ECO 4 of pathworks
for unix servers).
Regards
Daniel
|
371.2 | Regarding PWUNIX_ECO450F and ECO 5 FOR V5.0F | CSC32::BAXTER | | Mon Apr 14 1997 15:10 | 19 |
| Tim,
Only ECOs that are submitted via Digital Standard 204 are made
available via TIMA and then DSNlink/WIS/DIA. Regarding
PWUNIX_ECO450F - this is the last ECO that was submitted from
engineering for V5.0F. Since a kit to supersede this kit has not
been submitted, PWUNIX_ECO450F is the most recent ECO. If ECO 5
is available, I am unsure why PATHWORKS for DIGITAL UNIX has not
submitted it to Digital Standard 204. I will see if I can get
any information on this.
For the most part, if an ECO article exist in the DSNlink ECO-SUMMARY
database, it is the most current article/ECO that has been
submitted via Digital Standard 204 by engineering.
Sincerely,
Sally Baxter
MCS PM&D TIM ECO Team
|
371.3 | There is no ECO 5 for PATHWORKS V5.0F | CSC32::BAXTER | | Tue Apr 15 1997 09:39 | 8 |
| Tim (please forward to Daniel),
I sent mail to a PATHWORKS Problem Manager and was informed there was
no ECO 5 for V5.0F. That the product went from V5.0F ECO 4 to
V5.0G.
Sally Baxter
MCS PM&D TIM ECO Team
|
371.4 | More on there is no ECO 5 for V5.0F | CSC32::BAXTER | | Tue Apr 15 1997 11:50 | 9 |
| Tim (Daniel),
I just received some additional information regarding ECO 5 for V5.0F.
It appears it was "released" as a pre-ECO5 to correct some CLD issues
and was only supplied to one customer. It was not meant for general
distribution. The decision was to go to V5.0G instead of releasing
the pre-ECO5 as an official ECO 5 for V5.0F.
Sally Baxter
|
371.5 | | ZUR01::SUTTER | Who are you ??? - I'm BATMAN !!! | Tue Apr 15 1997 17:25 | 9 |
| let's focus on the Digital UNIX 'dupatch' kits: they are setld-based
and as such conform to DEC std. 204. They should certainly be made
available through TIMA and AES.
How can we make sure they get there ASAP?
Regards,
Arnold (one of the Digital UNIX Support people Tim was talking about)
|