| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 217.1 | See topic 165.0? | HLDE01::LENDERS_M | | Thu May 13 1993 10:06 | 6 |
| 217.2 | Second quarter FY94 | OSLACT::OLAV | Do it in parallel! | Sat May 15 1993 17:50 | 4 |
| 217.3 | Not commitment for NT yet.... | HLDE01::KOOI_J | | Mon May 17 1993 15:38 | 10 |
| 217.4 | Don't wait too long | OSLACT::OLAV | Do it in parallel! | Tue May 25 1993 11:00 | 7 |
| 217.5 | NT not there | HLDE01::KAMPEN_P | | Tue May 25 1993 14:34 | 5 |
| 217.6 | | BIGUN::MAYNE | `AXP!': Bill the Cat | Tue Jun 08 1993 10:32 | 4 |
| 217.7 | | ISTWI1::DATCA::daruger | Ferhat Daruger | Tue Jun 08 1993 19:52 | 26 |
| 217.8 | Rdb on NT ? | UTRTSC::SCHOLLAERT | You name, we support it... | Fri Jun 18 1993 10:34 | 131 |
| 217.9 | If Rdb is that strategic... | HLDE01::KOOI_J | | Fri Jul 23 1993 16:31 | 8 |
| 217.10 | Oracle minded ? | UTRTSC::SCHOLLAERT | You name, we support it... | Mon Jul 26 1993 08:00 | 19 |
| 217.11 | | SAC::EDMUNDS | imagine someone still working there | Mon Jul 26 1993 13:36 | 6 |
| 217.12 | Rdb support in December 1993? | SCAACT::RESENDE | Subvert the dominant paradigm. | Mon Jul 26 1993 17:25 | 11 |
| 217.13 | Freedom of choice | UTRTSC::SCHOLLAERT | You name, we support it... | Tue Jul 27 1993 08:15 | 13 |
| 217.14 | FWIW | STKAI1::SWE152::AnnLjungberg | something with Thomas | Thu Nov 11 1993 12:06 | 2 |
| 217.15 | But not on AXP... | BIGUN::MAYNE | `AXP!': Bill the Cat | Thu Nov 11 1993 22:22 | 0 |
| 217.16 | But maybe soon! | UFP::MKING | Client/Servant - at my home at least | Fri Nov 12 1993 21:14 | 1 |
| 217.17 | NT Server??? | PERPLE::MARTIN | the answer is 42... | Thu Nov 03 1994 00:07 | 4 |
| 217.18 | Today's status of LNX V3 for NT server | HLDE01::SCHERMER_R | | Tue Nov 08 1994 13:56 | 18 |
| 217.19 | How about today? | WELCLU::GIBSON | Alan Gibson @WLO | Sun Jun 04 1995 18:14 | 9 |
| 217.20 | NT releases | HLDE01::TACK_L | | Mon Jun 05 1995 22:36 | 11 |
| 217.21 | LINKWORKS PROJECT | DAIVC::SUSILOWATI | | Fri Jan 24 1997 14:15 | 23 |
| Hello!
We are currently handling a very prospective project for LinkWorks
3.0.8. However, we would like to know that if the customer is to migrate
from Recital database to Oracle, can LinkWorks 3.0.8 runs on top of Oracle
7.2 for Workgroup on the NT 3.51 server?
We offer Oracle for Workgroup due to the migration of 4GL development
which was made in Recital prior to this project and the size of the users
(20 only) in that factory.
Existing:
DEC5500 + Ultrix + Recital
Proposed System:
AlphaServer 1000 + NT 3.51 + Oracle for Workgroup 7.2 + LinkWorks 3.0.8
Thank you for your kind attention and we look forward to hear from you.
Best regards,
Susi Irawan
SI-Groupware
Digital Indonesia
|
| 217.22 | *** URGENT *** | DAIVC::SUSILOWATI | | Fri Jan 31 1997 07:42 | 7 |
| Hi!
Our customer is very anxious in knowing about the matter discussed in
my previous note. Can anyone help?
Thank you,
Susi Irawan
|
| 217.23 | | maandaj.uto.dec.com::~::ANONYMOUS% | | Fri Feb 14 1997 11:58 | 10 |
| Susi,
Pls ask your LinkWorks 3 questions in the LINKWORKS_V3 conference. It is more
lifely there.
There is a version of Lnx for NT Alpha Oracle. It needs NT 3.5.1 and Oracle 7.2.2
See note 6.* in the LINKWORKS_V3 conference for pointers to the kits.
Regards,
Jos
|