[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT. |
Notice: | Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187 |
Moderator: | TAEC::BEROUD |
|
Created: | Mon Aug 21 1989 |
Last Modified: | Wed Jun 04 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 6497 |
Total number of notes: | 27359 |
6431.0. "Wish: more data in alarms-procedure's .DAT-file" by STKHLM::BERGGREN (Nils Berggren,DC Sweden 876-8287) Tue Feb 27 1996 21:43
Hi,
When an alarm-rule triggered by a DataCollector event fires and the
alarm-datafile is created, there's one field which would be very good
to have included: 'Perseived Severity'.
When notification displays such an alarm, it displays both the severity
defined by the alarm-rule *and* also the severity of the DataCollector-event
(displayed in the field 'Perseived Severity').
This 'original' severity can not be determined by the batch-procedure
started by alarms FM.
A customer has a problem with the integration of RoboMon with decmcc (I don't
have the details on how they do it). Their problem is that when a problem
occurs it sends a DC-event to DECmcc with some severity (except CLEAR)
and with a certain fixed title and text. When the problem disappears, it sends
a DC-event with exactly the same title and text but with a CLEAR-severity.
In the DECmcc maps, that's OK, since there will be a correlation between the
events, and the correct colour is reflected in the map.
However, the batch-job that starts when the alarm-rule fires upon receiving
the DC-event has no way of knowing if it's a clear or severe event....
Question to the DECmcc support team:
-------------------------------------
Would it be possible to include it in the .DAT-file created which is passed to
the batch-job procedure?
thanks,
Nils
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines
|
---|