T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
6279.1 | Create dummy files may be make the check ok | AZUR::DURIF | | Fri Apr 21 1995 17:32 | 14 |
| Hi,
The problem you mention is real.
At this time we have no fix for that.
I may suggest a crazy idea to create dummy files using a text editor to make
the check ok.
I know this is a short term solution.
Hope this helps,
Benoit
|
6279.2 | Any official support for DNS V2.0 ? | COL01::LOPEZ | Arturo Lopez drinks K�lsch at Cologne | Thu May 04 1995 15:48 | 12 |
| does mcc V1.4 support DNS V2.0 ?
I have MCC v1.4 and VAX DNS V1.1. It seems to work fine. No problems at
the moment, but VAX DNS V1.1 sometimes dies. I'm looking forward to usr
DNS V2.0.
Is this supported ?
Arturo Lopez
Cologne Germany
|
6279.3 | DNS V2.0 is supported | AZUR::DURIF | | Fri May 05 1995 15:22 | 9 |
| Hi Arturo,
I my understanding DNS V2.0 comes with DECnet/OSI 6.1.
DECmcc V1.4 supports this configuration. If i remember well is is stated
in the SPD.
Please let me know if it is not.
Benoit
|
6279.4 | YES ?, but ... | BRADEC::BOJTOS | Jan Bojtos | Fri May 05 1995 23:51 | 18 |
| Hi,
It looks like YES (DNS V2.0 is "supported"),
a) IF I create dummy files according to .1
b) IF I ignore error messages during mcc_dns_setup.com execution
concerning adding access rights for namespace directories.The commands
created by mcc_dns_setup.com are not commands for DNS V2.0 (it looks
like DNS V1.1 commands, I don't know DNS V1.1.)
I've installed DECmccV1.4 in VMS V6.1 and DECnet/OSi V5.8 environment. I
must say I didn't try it under DECnet/OSI V6.1, but I think DNS version
should be the same for both DECnet/OSI versions.
If I'm wrong , please let me know.
Rgds
Jan
|
6279.5 | | AZUR::DURIF | | Wed May 10 1995 10:04 | 11 |
| Hi Jan,
>> a) IF I create dummy files according to .1
>> b) IF I ignore error messages during mcc_dns_setup.com execution
You are right for the "IF".
We have to plan a fix for a future MCC version.
Regards,
Benoit
|