| Title: | DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT. |
| Notice: | Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187 |
| Moderator: | TAEC::BEROUD |
| Created: | Mon Aug 21 1989 |
| Last Modified: | Wed Jun 04 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 6497 |
| Total number of notes: | 27359 |
Hi,
I'm having some strange problems at a customer site:
We have an alarm rule like:
MCC> sho domain SE_NS:.TELIA.C.HAN.CRT-LAN Rule TRAP_TEST all char
Domain SE_NS:.TELIA.C.HAN.CRT-LAN Rule TRAP_TEST
AT 10-APR-1995 14:10:35 Characteristics
Examination of attributes shows:
Expression = (occurs(snmp * any configuration
event))
Severity = Minor
Probable Cause = Unknown
I have started a notification request for the domain in question like:
MCC> notify domain .TELIA.C.HAN.CRT-LAN
This rule works fine when, for instance, a LinkUp or LinkDown trap is sent
to the DECmcc station.
But, if I start a notification request like:
MCC> notify domain .TELIA.C.HAN.CRT-LAN entity=(snmp *), -
events=(any configuration event)
I don't get any notifications.
Issuing a GETEVENT-command works ok, though...
Why doesn't the notification request display the traps?
Looking at the counters for MCC 0 TCPIP_AM SINK I see the traps coming in....
We're running DECmcc BMS V1.3 on VMS 5.5-2.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Nils Berggren
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6266.1 | User error, now fixed! | STKHLM::BERGGREN | Nils Berggren,DC Sweden, 876-8287 | Wed Apr 26 1995 11:36 | 14 |
Well, it was a user error.... They had changed the IP-address on the node we tested the LinkDown and LinkUp traps on, so I guess that Notification Fm couldn't match the event-sender to any object in the domain in question. Now, when they have the correct address in MCC, everything works as expected. Regards, Nils | |||||