| Title: | DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT. |
| Notice: | Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187 |
| Moderator: | TAEC::BEROUD |
| Created: | Mon Aug 21 1989 |
| Last Modified: | Wed Jun 04 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 6497 |
| Total number of notes: | 27359 |
Hi,
One of my customers, a large dutch bank has a MDF (BRS) cluster
installed along with a DECnis as X.25 gateway. The customer also has
an IBM mainframe connected via an SNA gateway.
The management of this environment is being largely automated
using DECmcc and various other Polycenter products. The Bank wants to
monitor this configuration from the central Netview console. Critically
or potentially critically disruptive situations need to be reported to
Netview.
In the light of the switch to PCNV; Can you tell me whether a Netview
link solution consisting of DECmcc+Polycenter SNA manager in combination
with the Solve-Connect product will:
- Function properly for both alarms and two way interaction?
- Be supported for approx. 1 year? (until Jan. 1996 time frame)
Regards,
Rob
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6132.1 | Function ok - support ? | BIKINI::KRAUSE | CSC Network Management/Hubs | Wed Oct 12 1994 09:33 | 14 |
> In the light of the switch to PCNV; Can you tell me whether a Netview > link solution consisting of DECmcc+Polycenter SNA manager in combination > with the Solve-Connect product will: > > - Function properly for both alarms and two way interaction? Definitely YES. This was one of the major advantages of this solution. And I'm speaking from experience - it works as advertised! > - Be supported for approx. 1 year? (until Jan. 1996 time frame) I'll leave this to product management. *Robert | |||||