[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference azur::mcc

Title:DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT.
Notice:Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187
Moderator:TAEC::BEROUD
Created:Mon Aug 21 1989
Last Modified:Wed Jun 04 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:6497
Total number of notes:27359

5935.0. "Prune mibs be hand ?" by WELLIN::MCCALLUM () Wed Apr 06 1994 09:06

    I wish to put an alarm on a DEChub900 chassis power supply , but I am
    having trouble because the mib is too deep, it is gretaer than 10
    levels and when I try to create the alarm rule it fails.
    
    If I complie the MIB in and prune it I then can make the alarm work
    because it ends up avbout 4 levels less deep., unfortunately clicking
    down the mib from the IMPM then doesn't work but that is incidental.
    
    In pruning the mib it has taken severlal levels out, but I dont want to
    take all the levels out, just enough to make it work as I may have to
    put other bits in later.
    
    My question is:
    
    Is it easy/possible to prune the mibs by hand ?
    
    Thanks
    Dave McCallum
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
5935.1No, but use new translatorsBIKINI::KRAUSEEuropean NewProductEngineer for MCCThu Apr 07 1994 05:3413
>    Is it easy/possible to prune the mibs by hand ?

I don't think this is possible, because the MIB translator will produce 
wrong OIDs if you 'prune' the MIB file.

BUT, you could use updated versions of MTU/MSL to get around the level 
limitation. Look in BIKINI::MCC_DISK:[BMS013.VMS.PATCH] for

MCC_TCPIP_MTU.EXE;1                          589   1-SEP-1993 16:53:26.00
MCC_MSL.README;1                               3  16-DEC-1993 14:46:03.00
MCC_MSL_MAIN.EXE;1                           274  16-DEC-1993 13:26:30.00

*Robert
5935.2Maybe I have the wrong problemWELLIN::MCCALLUMThu Apr 07 1994 07:3922
    
    WELL MAYBE I HAVE The wrong problem. The mib compiles OK and I can do a
    sho on the entity and it works.
    
    sho snmp lhub1 dec ema decmibextension dechub900
    mgmtagent mgmtagentversion1 chassis chaspowerconfig
    chaspoerconfigchanges
    
    works file
    
    but when I try to anble an alarm rule with a change_of rule I get
    
    data base error while reading rule information
    MIR status MCC_E_ILVTOOBIG no more roo m in buffer for additional
    values
    
    I thought this was beuse the MIB was too deep. 
    
    Is it ?
    
    Dave.
    
5935.3Problem in Alarms FMBIKINI::KRAUSEEuropean NewProductEngineer for MCCFri Apr 08 1994 03:5313
>    MIR status MCC_E_ILVTOOBIG no more roo m in buffer for additional
>    values

I believe this problem is mentioned somewhere in this conference, but 
can't remember the circumstances. It certainly looks like a resource 
limitation in the Alarms FM and it has to do with the depth of the MIB 
(number of child entity levels in MCC). Alarms FM has to store the 
object with its value in MIR for a CHANGE_OF rule and this is where it 
hits the roof.

You should escalate this problem to get it fixed. Should be easy.

*Robert
5935.4MOLAR::YAHEY::BOSEMon Apr 11 1994 19:456
	Actually, I remember someone already fixing it for the MUP kit 
	(which apparently never went out). But it should be available
	as a patch to the Alarms FM.

	Rahul.
5935.5Can I get it ???WELLIN::MCCALLUMThu Apr 21 1994 12:297
    
    Anyone know how to get this patch ???
    
    Thanks,
    
    Dave McCallum