[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT. |
Notice: | Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187 |
Moderator: | TAEC::BEROUD |
|
Created: | Mon Aug 21 1989 |
Last Modified: | Wed Jun 04 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 6497 |
Total number of notes: | 27359 |
5865.0. "decmcc and private traps" by COMICS::MISTRY () Fri Feb 11 1994 06:16
Hi,
I found this stars article, could someone please point me in the direction of
the patch.
Bipin
[DECmcc] Notification doesn't work on some private traps reception.
******************** CAUTION: FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY *********************
* *
* THIS INFORMATION IS FOR USE BY DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. AND ITS *
* EMPLOYEES ONLY. PLEASE USE EXTREME CARE IF YOU MUST DISCUSS ANY *
* PART OF THIS INFORMATION WITH ANYONE WHO IS NOT A DIGITAL EMPLOYEE. *
* *
******************************************************************************
PROBLEM/SOLUTION ARTICLE OUTLINE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRODUCT: Polycenter Framework ( DECmcc Director ) V1.3
Polycenter Network Mangager 200 ( DECmcc BMS ) V1.3
Polycenter Network Mangager 400 ( DECmcc EMS ) V2.3
VMS 5.4-X, 5.5-X
Ultrix 4.X
DATE: 09-SEP-1993
SYMPTOMS/PROBLEM:
When receiving enterpriseSpecific SNMP traps whose variable list is not an
exact match of Dictionary definitions :
1/ GETEVENT requests work BUT return a warning message.
2/ NOTIFICATION requests DON'T work.
ANALYSIS:
Here is an example with a private trap named chipPortDown received from
Chipcom hubs. The ASN1 source file describes the trap as follows :
chipPortDown TRAP-TYPE
ENTERPRISE chipcom
VARIABLES { olPortSlotIndex,
olPortIndex,
olPortAdminState,
olPortStatus,
olEnetStatsPortLastSrcAddr}
DESCRIPTION
"A chipPortDown trap indicates that a port's status
has changed to an error condition. Multiple chipPortDown
traps may be sent if the port's status changes from
one error to another."
::= 11
After the compilation, all the variables are defined as arguments of the
event chipPortDown.
In a first case, the variable 'olEnetStatsPortLastSrcAddr' is not set on
the Chipcom hub : thus, it is not sent in the trap PDU by the remote agent.
Issuing the following command :
MCC>getevent snmp * chipcom chipportdown
the following event is received ( note the warning message -----+
|
SNMP LOCAL_NS:.snmp.etoile1 chipcom |
AT 1993-04-30-08:42:43.637I----- CONFIGURATION EVENTS v
Received event had less object ids than were defined in the dictionary:
Event: chipPortDown
A chipPortDown trap was received:
enterprise = "1.3.6.1.4.1.49"
agent-addr = 16.188.48.108
generic-trap = enterpriseSpecific
specific-trap = 11
time-stamp = 62451
olPortSlotIndex = 3
olPortIndex = 1
olPortAdminState = enabled
olPortStatus = linkFailure
but a notification request as :
MCC>notify domain .demo_openlink_v13 entity list=(snmp * chipcom),
events=(any events)
never completes !
In a second case, after setting the 'olEnetStatsPortLastSrcAddr' variable on
the Chipcom hub, the same notification request completes successfully as
follows :
%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Event, 1993-04-30-09:04:37. %%%%%%%%%%%%%% [1]
Domain: LOCAL_NS:.demo_openlink_v13 Severity:
Indeterminate
Notification Entity: SNMP LOCAL_NS:.snmp.etoile1 chipcom
Event Source: SNMP LOCAL_NS:.snmp.etoile1 chipcom
Event: chipPortDown
A chipPortDown trap was received:
enterprise = "1.3.6.1.4.1.49"
agent-addr = 16.188.48.108
generic-trap = enterpriseSpecific
specific-trap = 11
time-stamp = 4507
olPortSlotIndex = 4
olPortIndex = 2
olPortAdminState = disabled
olPortStatus = security_breach
olEnetStatsPortLastSrcAddr = %X08002b047f37
So it means that when the number of variables associated with a trap doesn't
exactly match the number expected by the AM ( defined in the dictionary ),
the AM associates to the event a response which is something other than
"success" and in this case the Notification FM drops the event.
SOLUTION:
The Notification FM needs to be fixed to handle this properly. In the
meantime, a workaround has been set in the SNMP AM : it always returns
success status, not depending on the fact that less or more variables might
have been returned by the agent. This new image is available through CSC on
both Ultrix and VMS.
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
5865.1 | CSC does not have the patch | BIKINI::KRAUSE | European NewProductEngineer for MCC | Mon Feb 14 1994 07:14 | 8 |
| >This new image is available through CSC on
>both Ultrix and VMS.
Ha, ha, ha - the old joke again. I'm getting tired of those Stars
articles. Does anybody care to supply the CSCs with those patches before
publishing articles??? And CSC does NOT only mean Colorado!
*Robert (CSC Munich)
|