T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
5727.1 | To Prune or not to Prune | BIKINI::KRAUSE | European NewProductEngineer for MCC | Wed Nov 10 1993 10:08 | 10 |
| >> %DAP-I-CMD_LINE, Command: CREATE CLASS SNMP SUBCLASS DEC SUBCLASS EMA SUBCLAS
The error message was truncated. Could you please post it in whole?
Did you specify the 'prune' option? If yes, this isn't gonna work
because the hooks for subsequent mib branches got pruned away.
I'll try to load the MIBs into my system and see what happens.
*Robert
|
5727.2 | next problem | HLRG02::NOTES | Opel Manta | Thu Nov 11 1993 02:21 | 26 |
| >>> %DAP-I-CMD_LINE, Command: CREATE CLASS SNMP SUBCLASS DEC SUBCLASS EMA
>SUBCLAS
>
>The error message was truncated. Could you please post it in whole?
Sorry I don't have this anymore.
>Did you specify the 'prune' option? If yes, this isn't gonna work
>because the hooks for subsequent mib branches got pruned away.
Yes, I selected prune.
Later on...
I have loaded two DEChub900 MIB's now without the prune option and I didn't
get any error messages from the MTU-utility.
BUT when I start MCC and go into a HUB900 and double click on the EMA
child-entity I get the following error message:
software error: invalid in_entity (input entity) parameter.
How come???
/-/ Henk.
|
5727.3 | one after the other... | BIKINI::KRAUSE | European NewProductEngineer for MCC | Thu Nov 11 1993 08:35 | 18 |
| > software error: invalid in_entity (input entity) parameter.
Hmm, the message doesn't tell much. Did you try it from the command
line? (Use forms mode and the help key to walk through the tree). I hope
you didn't mess up your dictionary during the previous load attempts.
A good but lengthy way to check is running a REBUILD in DAP to rebuild
the parse table (took 8 hours last time I did it).
I loaded the HUB900 MIBs yesterday and it worked for all but one
(DEC-HUB900-ERPTR-MIB-V1-0). This one gives a yacc stack overflow in MSL
because it is nested too deeply. Pruning helps getting it through MSL,
but then you cannot MERGE it into the dictionary anymore :-(
Tha yacc stack problem has already been reported here, but no solution.
Could you formally escalate it to bring it to engineering's attention?
*Robert
|
5727.4 | Did anyone escalate ? | STKMCC::LUND | Niklas Lund | Mon Nov 29 1993 10:05 | 6 |
| Hi,
What happend here did anyone escalate ?
We need the 900 repeater mib in MCC ASAP. Please give me that CLD number.
/Niklas
|
5727.5 | Pointer? | MSBCS::NEDOROSCIK | Welcome to wherever you are! | Thu Mar 31 1994 17:44 | 5 |
| Hello,
Does anybody have a pointer to the DEChub 900 MIBs?
Thanks, John.
|
5727.6 | More info in KALI::HUB_MGNT | NPSS::WADE | Network Systems Support | Fri Apr 01 1994 10:30 | 8 |
|
Hi John,
Look in decwrl::"/pub/DEC/hub900/mibs".
By the way, do you have those graphs ready yet? (private joke)
|
5727.7 | concentrator mib? | MSBCS::NEDOROSCIK | Welcome to wherever you are! | Thu Apr 14 1994 17:24 | 6 |
|
Is the DECconcentrator 900MX mib available?
Thanks, John.
Bill, did you check those graphs?
|