Title: | DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT. |
Notice: | Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187 |
Moderator: | TAEC::BEROUD |
Created: | Mon Aug 21 1989 |
Last Modified: | Wed Jun 04 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 6497 |
Total number of notes: | 27359 |
I have set up a bunch of terminal server alarms to monitor tx and rx failures for my customers 74 terminal servers (2 alarms per server). Each alarm polls once an hour. For the most part, these alarms work OK. However, of the 148 rules per hour I get anywhere from 1 or 2 to a dozen or so exceptions of "Can't communicate with target". Yet, these server are up and running ok. I think the problem has to do with the speed with which the TS_AM expects the server to respond. Is there some sort of timer I can adjust to make the AM wait a few milliseconds longer before it declares an exception. Using TSM to talk to these server has no problem, but using the iconic map PM of MCC and querying a given server serveral times in a row will give an occassional "can't communicate with target". Though I haven't completely correlated it, most of the servers that experience this problem are at "remote" sites connect via Vitalink bridges. The network is running normally in all other respects. The servers are DS200, DS300, DS700, and DS90L+. Thanks, Richard
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5632.1 | re .0 | TRKWSH::COMFORT | Here beside the rising tide | Fri Oct 01 1993 15:01 | 8 |
I have seen similar "remote" problems with Vitalink bridge console protocol. Invariably (in my case), there is something happening to the wire when this happens, ie. an sudden increase in CRC errors, etc. If the lines are 56kbps or greater, it should be okay as far as timing. Dave | |||||
5632.2 | Little or no line errors! | MORO::MAUTZ_RI | Networks >= to DECnet | Mon Oct 04 1993 00:18 | 2 |
I have looked at the Vitalinks and there doesn't seem to be any difficulties with line errors. |