T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
5538.1 | Lot of words but nothing definative !! | PLUNDR::LOWEG | WANTED!! A modern day Robin Hood. | Thu Aug 26 1993 05:34 | 13 |
|
See VINO::POLYCENTRE or the note that is highlighted when you OPEN MCC.
This contains more waffling words about this subject..
But I think Markus like the rest of us want to know what the hell
is going on with MCC in PLAIN language. Especially from a support
angle..
Is there any plain speakers out there in the know, who would like
to let the rest of us in on what is going to happen ??
Gary Lowe NUK CSC comms.
|
5538.2 | I'll try... | TOOK::MINTZ | Erik Mintz | Thu Aug 26 1993 09:11 | 34 |
| You can see note 5460 in this conference, as well as note 173 and others
in the VINO::POLYCENTER conference. There is also a taped DVN broadcast
available (or will be shortly), and a sales update article.
I'll try to summarize in as clear a language as I can.
- The Polycenter product suite will quickly be migrating to use
Polycenter Netview as a base, rather than DECmcc as a base.
- There will be no further enhancements to the DECmcc based products.
- There will be no general release of BMS or the director (PNM 200, etc)
on any platform beyond the current VAX/VMS and RISC/ULTRIX
- We will continue to support the current VAX/VMS and RISC/ULTRIX
products (bugfixes and whatever is necessary to support O/S releases
of VMS or ULTRIX) for some time, and will be providing migration
support for customers to switch to Netview based tools.
As a result of some staffing issues (most of which pre-date the
Netview announcement) we are experiencing some delays in resolving
DECmcc problems at this time (for example, an inability to keep up
with the volume of questions in this notes conference.) We in
engineering appologize for the pain this is causing. We are working
as quickly as possible to improve this support, but it will take some
time still.
You can actually find all of the above information from the sources cited
at the top of this message. If you are going to discuss the issue with
customers, please review the other material first (and leave out the part
about our internal staffing issue -:)
-- Erik Mintz
|
5538.3 | By standard T's and C's , 7 years for mcc support | BMT::AMMU | | Thu Aug 26 1993 13:06 | 3 |
|
I think by standard T's and C's mcc will be supported for 7 years
|
5538.4 | More details | TOOK::MINTZ | Erik Mintz | Thu Aug 26 1993 19:20 | 124 |
| In the interest of clarity, I've excersized moderators privilege to
correct a detail or two in this note and removed the corresponding
replies with corrections:
================================================================================
Note 5538.4 POLYCENTER NetView announcement - end of mcc??? 4 of 6
BLUMON::WEISENFELD "Marian" 115 lines 26-AUG-1993 16:28
-< Hey, LET'S SHOW SOME LIFE, FOLKS !! >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Folks,
The simple response to the question posted in the base note is
NO!!!!
The POLYCENTER Network Manager 200 & 400, and the POLYCENTER SNMP
Manager 300 will continue to be supported. Furthermore, the
POLYCENTER Network Manager on OpenVMS VAX will be updated to
provide support for V6.0, and the POLYCENTER Network Manager on
ULTRIX will support V4.3a.
SUPPORT FOR THESE PRODUCTS WILL CONTINUE INDEFINITELY...we have
not announced any product retirement information relative to the
POLYCENTER NetView announcement. (Note that the POLYCENTER SNMP
Manager will not be sold after December 31, 1993 due to its
tight integration with the Ingres database.)
The egineers, technical consultants, product marketing managers
and services are all committed to continuing to support the
currently shipping POLYCENTER products. This means that the
FIELD should also be supporting and SELLING these products.
Finally, the account teams have been clamoring for a specific
statement of direction regarding the POLYCENTER portfolio, and
have been asking for a better way to compete against HP.
Well, now you have it!
First, Digital is committed to open, distributed, client-server
computing, and we will deliver it on all AXP platforms, emphasizing
in FY94 our world-class UNIX operating system, DEC OSF/1 AXP.
Second, POLYCENTER NetView delivers the best-in-class, windows-
based graphical user interface that customers have been looking
for. This GUI will be consistent across all AXP platforms.
Third, POLYCENTER NetView ensures that there is a defacto,
industry standard set of APIs for ISVs so that all of the leading
system and network management products can be easily ported to
and launched on AXP platforms.
Fourth, Digital and IBM are combining resources to support a joint
third party association based on the NetView/6000 technology. This
means that the list of potential management applications for Digital
customers just tripled in size.
Finally, Digital has always led the industry with services and systems
integration support, and we will continue to do so using the new
POLYCENTER NetView technology, and providing a smooth migration path
for our existing POLYCENTER customers.
Hey folks, BELIEVE IT, LIVE IT, AND TALK ABOUT IT WITH YOUR CUSTOMERS!
Yours, in truth and sincerity,
Marian
And for more information ... please refer to the following areas, some
of which were mentioned in a previous reply (thank you, Erik!):
Please look in the following notes conferences for information
relating to the POLYCENTER Strategy and the POLYCENTER NetView
announcement:
VINO::POLYCENTER.NOTE
IMDOWN::NETVIEW.NOTE
MOLAR::NETMGT.NOTE
In a continuing effort to bring you information as soon as possible
we have posted POLYCENTER files in the public area. Some of this
information is DIGITAL CONFIDENTIAL, and should be treated appropriately.
The following directories contain POLYCENTER NetView information:
Directory VINO::POLYCENTER$PUBLIC:[ANNOUNCEMENTS]
Directory VINO::POLYCENTER$PUBLIC:[SALES_TOOLS]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
POLYCENTER NetView Press Release --
POLYCENTER_NETVIEW_PRESS_RELEASE.TXT;1
POLYCENTER NetView Sales Update Article --
SALES_UPDATE_24AUG.TXT;1
POLYCENTER NetView White Paper --
POLYCENTER_NETVIEW.TXT;1
*** NOTE: The Q&A at the end of this document is "DIGITAL CONFIDENTIAL"
POLYCENTER NetView PID --
The overview presentation for the August 24th POLYCENTER announcement
(which is a PID until August 24th), is available in these POLYCENTER
public area locations:
POLYCENTER_NETVIEW_SLIDES.PS;1
POLYCENTER_NETVIEW_SLIDE_SCRIPT.PS;1
Please note that one file contains the overheads and the other contains
the scripted presentation.
TWO IMPORTANT NOTES!
Refer to the speaker notes and make a choice between slides 19 and 20,
don't use both.
Pages 8 & 9 are almost exact repeats *except* ... 8 is optional for the
analyst/consultant audience, speaker notes correctly point this out ...
9 is optional for the ISV audience, note the middle of the POLYGON says
"YOUR" management applications, speaker notes need to be updated because
they say this is for the analyst/consultant audience, too.
|
5538.5 | Define "quickly". | DPDMAI::DAVIES | Mark, SCA Area Network Consultant | Fri Aug 27 1993 10:33 | 18 |
| RE: .2
You mention that the Polycenter product suite will quickly be migrating
to use the Netview base.
Define what you mean by quickly. 6 months? 1 year? 2 years?
ANother way to ak this question is when will Polycenter Netview support
DECnet PIV, Bridges, FDDI, etc.
Although I recognize the long term potential, at first ship, Polycenter
Netview will be a replacement for MSU and it won't be capab;e of
managing as many entities.
Regards,
Mark
|
5538.6 | | CSOADM::ROTH | Former K-notes, NOTES11 and Vnotes user | Fri Aug 27 1993 15:59 | 1 |
| And don't forget Terminal Server support...
|
5538.7 | No support for new functionality, right? | OSLACT::BJORN | Bj�rn Olav Haugom | Mon Aug 30 1993 07:23 | 26 |
| >
> The POLYCENTER Network Manager 200 & 400, and the POLYCENTER SNMP
> Manager 300 will continue to be supported. Furthermore, the
> POLYCENTER Network Manager on OpenVMS VAX will be updated to
> provide support for V6.0, and the POLYCENTER Network Manager on
> ULTRIX will support V4.3a.
>
> SUPPORT FOR THESE PRODUCTS WILL CONTINUE INDEFINITELY...we have
> not announced any product retirement information relative to the
> POLYCENTER NetView announcement. (Note that the POLYCENTER SNMP
> Manager will not be sold after December 31, 1993 due to its
> tight integration with the Ingres database.)
>
One thing NOT mentioned is what type of support we will get. POLYCENTER NEtwork
Manager 200 & 400 is not what we want to support forever. We lack a lot of
functionality in the products to make them user-friendly. I guess we won't see
new functionality in the products, and hence we don't get the support we need
to sell these products. I can't sell this product today when I know we won't
enhance it further in functionality.
If this is not true, could someone put up a list of things that will be
enhanced, so that we know what to expect.
Bj�rn Olav Haugom
|
5538.8 | Support should be there (for a few years anyway) | TOOK::GUERTIN | MCC: Legend or Nightmare? | Mon Aug 30 1993 08:54 | 10 |
| re:.7
Olav,
I agree with everything you have said except for the part about
support. The product has been supported for the last couple of months
with less people than it should have had. This will probably continue
for a few more weeks. But there are serious plans to increase the
product support to some reasonable level.
-Matt.
|
5538.9 | | TOOK::MINTZ | Erik Mintz | Mon Aug 30 1993 23:42 | 8 |
| As Matt has indicated, we are in the process of improving our
remedial support effort. However, as you note, no new features
are planned in the VMS or ULTRIX based products. We will be focusing
our enhancement efforts on the new products, and hope the customers
will be pleased with the results.
-- Erik
|
5538.10 | What about TeMIP as basis for PNM 200? | OSLACT::BJORN | Bj�rn Olav Haugom | Tue Sep 14 1993 12:15 | 19 |
| I'm not sure I understand this enough.
The TEMIP product will continue to be developed after being ported to OSF/1.
I read in a mail that TEMIP will still be using the POLYCENTER Framework, and
continue to develop the Framework in areas such as improve the dictionary
updates, implement distributed directors, and other Framework specific
functions. If this is the case, couldn't this work be adopted in the POLYCENTER
Network Manager 200 product, and be supported?
If I could decide, my customers could buy the POLYCENTER Framework V1.3, adding
nescessary POLYCENTER Packages, and updgrade to TEMIP when new functionality is
ready. The problem is the price. TEMIP is a lot more expensive than lets say
the POLYCENTER Framework pluss the NOTIFICATION Package, and the POLYCENTER
Network Manager 200 also I guess. The problem is that the customers can't
afford to upgrade to something they don't fully need.
Any feedback?
Bj�rn Olav Haugom
|
5538.11 | Sorry, TeMIP will be the only way to get the next release | TOOK::GUERTIN | MCC: Legend or Nightmare? | Thu Sep 16 1993 09:26 | 6 |
| Although it might be possible to do as you suggest, there are no plans
for any "new" polycenter director based products. We will be providing
TeMIP with a "bag" of components (as opposed to a full polycenter kit)
which they will use to build their product with.
-Matt.
|