[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT. |
Notice: | Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187 |
Moderator: | TAEC::BEROUD |
|
Created: | Mon Aug 21 1989 |
Last Modified: | Wed Jun 04 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 6497 |
Total number of notes: | 27359 |
5485.0. "Suggestion: ALARM poll mult. attributes & Boolean Support" by SUBWAY::YANNIOS (N�MAT NYO8/E2 DTN:352-3197) Fri Aug 13 1993 15:28
Under certain circumstances, it may be necessary to define alarm
rules to check a number of attributes residing upon a given
entity within the network.
For example a customer is polling a VAX 6510 that is functioning as
an area router for such conditions as area reachability of 30 areas,
Ethernet errors, traffic rates, etc. When this system is being
polled by the MCC station residing on a standalone workstation, the
system can easily approach system wide resource exaustion of
available process slots, among other things, due to numerous
NML_xxxx processes created to service the polls that are servicing
the enabled alarm rules. (Perhaps there is a less resource intensive
approach that may reduce overhead in the above scenario)
Not sure if this has been suggested elsewhere in this conference
but, if not, it is suggested that this functionality be provided to
allow for the definition of alarm rules that can examine multiple
attributes from the same entity and support boolean operations...
eg. EXPRESSION(NODE4 .DNA_NODE.FOO ( LINE MNA-0 SYSTEM BUFFER
UNAVIALBE > 0) & (USER BUFFER UNAVAILABLE > 0) )
instead of two separate polls going out, the information would be
obtained in one poll.
Are there any plans for such functionality? Is this practical? Is
this feasible?
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
5485.1 | | MOLAR::DFLAT::PLOUFFE | Jerry | Mon Aug 16 1993 09:49 | 9 |
| RE: -.1
It's practical -- It's feasible -- It just hasn't been done yet!
Future project direction is currently being planned. We will keep
this kind of request in mind.
- Jerry
|