Title: | DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT. |
Notice: | Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187 |
Moderator: | TAEC::BEROUD |
Created: | Mon Aug 21 1989 |
Last Modified: | Wed Jun 04 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 6497 |
Total number of notes: | 27359 |
I have recently upgraded to version 1.3 of mcc with the expectation that some of the problems with 1.2 would be fixed. The 1.2 problems are still evident along with a number of new problems. Problem 1. You cannot graph historical SNMP data. This actually worked in version 1.2 of mcc but does not function now. I set the scope of interest time to a period in the passed with a duration that finishes before the current time. The interval time I used coicides with the interval time used to record the data. When I graph the data such as a count on an SNMP interface I get a value of 1 repeated on the graph. Using the same scope of interest time using the operations menu returns the appropriate data. Graphing historical statistics does not work at all . The graph seems to now go off into never never land and does not graph any data even though the little man continues to run as if the graph was functioning. The data is generally available through the command line interface without any problems. Problem 2. When I use the ip reachability poller to check for reachability I will occassionally get spurious failures. I have set the retries to 5 and the timeout to 15 seconds and am only polling every 10 minutes. These spurious failures also occur when a "real" failure occurs. That is if I loose a link that provides connectivity to 10 remote stations that I am polling, in addition to the 10 failures associated with the link going down there are usually a number of other reachability events that will occur at the same time as the first events. These will clear the next time they are polled 10 minutes later. Problem 3. I now find that some of my recorded data seems to be invalid. I recently went to look at the past utilization on an SNMP interface. I found that the utilization remained exactly the same for a number of hours. When I went to look at the counters using the command line interface I found that the counters returned what I will have to describe as "odd" values. Could this be a result of the upgrade procedure and should I restart from scratch the recording and delete the old recorded data ? Problem 4. The system seems to get a large number of "rule * encountered an exception" errors when there is more than one user of DECmcc on the system. The help desk here has a window open to MCC to keep them informed of major network events. When they are on the system there is a great increase in the number of these errors. I have looked at the system and cannot seem to find any indication that the system is low on resources and both accounts accessing DECmcc are set up with account resources greater than those suggested in the manuals and release notes. Any suggestions ? I have already entered some of these problems into the version 1.2 QAR system last year without any response. Should I re-enter them into the 1.3 QAR system ? Thanks Harry Thanks Harry Kuhnen
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5239.1 | CANAJN::V_GILBERT | Wed Jun 23 1993 09:04 | 9 | ||
Re Problem 1 Graphing of snmp interface historical statistics is broken. The problem has been identified and an engineer is looking at it. We hope to fix it for the MUP. The problem has already been CLD'd. Verna | |||||
5239.2 | TOOK::R_SPENCE | Nets don't fail me now... | Wed Jun 23 1993 14:01 | 3 | |
What harware and operating system are you using? s/rob | |||||
5239.3 | VMS | CGOOA::KUHNEN | Fri Jun 25 1993 12:47 | 18 | |
Operating system VMS 5.5-1 MCC V1.3 Vaxstation 4000 Model 60 56 MB of memory I was able to get rid of the errors with two processes running by increasing my working set to 35000 from 25000 even though the MCC process that is running alarms only has on average 23000 pages in it's working set. Could there be a problem in the code related to paging under certain conditions ? Thanks Harry |