T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
5020.1 | Product management pointers | TOOK::MINTZ | Erik Pavlik Mintz | Tue May 11 1993 00:27 | 7 |
| For terminal server futures, I would suggest contacting
JONATHAN (MEMIT::) LEWANDOWSKI
For TSAM specific questions, you can also try
LAUREL (MOLAR::) NELSON
|
5020.2 | Any way to Get Data from a MS380 ?? | MSDOA::REED | John Reed @CBO, DTN:367-6463, KB4FFE, SouthEast | Wed Mar 16 1994 15:48 | 23 |
| I saw an intriguing entry in a recent notes entry about the DS900 being
registered to TSAM as DS900_as_DS700. This made me think about the
possibility of a special name convention allowing a device to be
registered using the -template- device type of some other entity, and
not be expected to fully conform to all -expected- parameters.
Is it possible to register a MUXserver 380, using the TSAM template for
the MS300 ? Perhaps the same sort of Syntax?
MCC> REGISTER TERMINAL_SERVER .muxserver type = MS380_as_MS300 ...
and would I be able to extract any meaningful data from this device.
My customer now uses the MS300's and MS380's in his network, and
the phone lines between sites rae notorious for having many CRC errors,
so I use TSAM rules for polling LINK UTILIZATION, and errors on the
300's. The customer would love to have RULES set up for the MS380 as
well. Will this work, or should I not bother with a trip to the
site to try it out ??
Thanks;
JR
|
5020.3 | There is some hope | BIKINI::KRAUSE | European NewProductEngineer for MCC | Thu Mar 17 1994 04:24 | 44 |
| > I saw an intriguing entry in a recent notes entry about the DS900 being
> registered to TSAM as DS900_as_DS700. This made me think about the
The type name should be DS900TM_as_DS700 which is type code 17. This
string is defined in the dictionary inside a constructed data type.
MS380 is not in there and 'self-guessed' type names won't work.
However, out of curiosity, I did a string dump of the TSAM module and
found "MS_380", "MS380", "MUXserver 380" and "MS3801ENG". So something
is in the code. I guess you should be able to register it just as MS300
and it would recognize it. I don't have an MS380 here so I can't try it.
Remember that you'll need the latest version (V1.0.4) for this to work
at all!
*Robert
P.S.: Here is the data type definition for attribute TYPE:
CREATE ATTRIBUTE Type CODE 50
! constructor_data_type
SET DEFINITION CODE 23 TYPE T -
COUNT 1 -
LENGTH 294 -
DEFINED TRUE -
USAGE ILV -
VALUE -
( -
2="DS100", -
3="DS200", -
4="DS500", -
5="MS100", -
6="MS300", -
7="DS300", -
8="DS250", -
9="DS90L", -
10="Unsupported_type_10", -
11="DS90Lplus_as_DS90L", -
12="DS700", -
13="DS90TL", -
14="Unsupported_type_14", -
16="DS90M_as_DS90TL", -
17="DS900TM_as_DS700", -
18="Unsupported_type_18")
|
5020.4 | Does Version V1.0.4 ship with EMS023 ?? | MSDOA::REED | John Reed @CBO, DTN:367-6463, KB4FFE, SouthEast | Thu Mar 17 1994 13:01 | 28 |
| Thanks for positive thoughts. Your reply (-.1) mentioned:
> Remember that you'll need the latest version (V1.0.4) for this to work
> at all!
What version of what code does this refer to. Is this a revision of
ROM, or FPROM, or HW in the MUXserver, or is it a reference to a
specific version of TSM, or a Version of TSAM ??
I tried (last week, while I was on the customer site) to register whole
of the customers' TSM database, using the TSM_CONVERT program that
comes with EMS023 on the CDROM. The MS380 did not show up as a
registered entity when I was done executing the .COM file produced.
I tried to register the MS380 using "TYPE=MS300", but it failed, with
some sort of unexpected data, or something. I didn't write down the
error. I just recalled that it wasn't supported, and shrugged.
If I need to re-compile a dictionary, or make some impossible-to-
suport changes, then I would rather tell my customer that he can't
manage the device yet. And ask in this forum, when I might be able to
tell my customer that he CAN manage it.
Thanks for the help.
JR
|
5020.5 | TSAM V1.0.4 is not in EMS023 | BIKINI::KRAUSE | European NewProductEngineer for MCC | Fri Mar 18 1994 04:30 | 13 |
| > -< Does Version V1.0.4 ship with EMS023 ?? >-
I was referring to Terminal Server AM V1.0.4 which is NOT in EMS023
(they still ship an older version). Just to be sure you get the right
version copy it from
BIKINI::MCC_DISK:[BMS013.VMS.PATCH]MCCTSAM010*.*
Don't get confused by the filenames (010); if in doubt look at the date
(23-JUL-1993). The kit is VMSINSTALable and will update the dictionary
and help library (read: this may take a few hours).
*Robert
|
5020.6 | any workaround ? | SWTHOM::NOBRE | Jocelyne Nobre - CST France | Tue Apr 05 1994 12:31 | 28 |
|
Terminal Server AM V1.0.4
( ana/ima sys$library:mcc_ts_am.exe gives DECMCC V1.0.4 from 23-jul-93 )
My customer tries to register a MUXserver 320 ( he has 10 MUXserver to
manage )
MCC> REGIS TERM term_name ADDRESS=ether_add ,TYPE=MS300
He get the message :
entity not fully registered...
On the iconicmap , when he "double click" into the terminal_server entity
he has child entities :
LAT
LINK ...
STATION ...
But , if he "double click" into LINK ... or STATION ... he has the message :
register server type MS300 does not match
the actual server type : Unsupported_type_14
If he registers the MUXserver 320 using type = Unsupported_type_14 there is no
error message but only LAT child entity is available .
Is there any workaround ? or TSAM will never supported MUX320,MUX380 ?
Thanks for reply.
Regards,
JOcelyne
|