T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
4759.1 | some info | MCDOUG::doug | pre-retinal integration | Thu Mar 25 1993 10:17 | 28 |
| VMS or ULTRIX?
What version of MCC ?
What exactly is it that you want to happen when you *get* the trap and you
*don't* have the IMPM running in front of you? Do you MCC to execute some
alarm procedures or something?
> How can you keep this sink process running in batch and also
> keep the notification filters that I've set up runnning??
>
What exactly do you mean when you say 'notification filters' ?
Notification Filters (as they apply to the IMPM notification services) are
only meaningful when you're running the IMPM (and Notification Services, of
course). POLYCENTER Network Manager V1.3 (hard to get into the habit of
typing all that...) allows you to save/restore the notification filters
that you create from the Notification Services UI.
> Is it as simple as putting the GETEVENT directive in a batch job
> along with the OCCURS alarm rule??
>
GetEvent is a one-shot. As soon as the event happens, the thread returns
and that's that. I think what you want is a small batch job that issues
the appropriate 'NOTIFY' commands with a duration of forever and enables
the rules that look for the events (OCCURS rules).
/doug
|
4759.2 | Sorry for lack of clarity.... | SPANKY::SAWYER | | Thu Mar 25 1993 13:05 | 13 |
| Sorry for the lack of clarity....
Running DECmcc 1.2.3 on VMS 5.4-2.
I want the Occurs alarm rules to fire when these linkUp/linkDown events
are trapped when the IMPM is not being used.
Doug, your last suggestion sounds like what I need.
I saved my notify requests to a .com file...do I just put these
notify requests in batch along with the OCCURS alarm rule which will
send mail when these events are trapped??
-Rob
|
4759.3 | Got it Working but Still Confused!! | SPANKY::SAWYER | | Thu Mar 25 1993 21:00 | 17 |
| I think I've got it working.
I just put the OCCURS alarm rules that check for the EVENTS in the
same batch job as the other alarm rules I have running in batch.
This seems to work.
I guess I'm just confused as to what starts the MCC_TCPIP_SINK
process. I figured that if I EXITED MCC that the process would
die.
But it is still running even though DECmcc is not active.
So is the fact that other entities are sending events to this
station what starts the occurrence of this process???
Confused,
Rob
|
4759.4 | A running alarm has an active DECmcc | TOOK::R_SPENCE | Nets don't fail me now... | Wed Apr 07 1993 14:35 | 4 |
| Ah, if you have alarm rules running somewhere (Batch maybe?) then
you DO have DECmcc running (or active as you say). So, no problem...
s/rob
|