[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
| Title: | DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT. |
| Notice: | Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187 |
| Moderator: | TAEC::BEROUD |
|
| Created: | Mon Aug 21 1989 |
| Last Modified: | Wed Jun 04 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 6497 |
| Total number of notes: | 27359 |
4611.0. "Bridge's alarm problem" by MLNCSC::BARILARO () Fri Feb 26 1993 04:50
Hi,
I've a problem with 2 rules testing the Bad Frames Received
on some bridges (bet150,bet200 and bet500) , one asking if
the Bad Frames Received > 100 and the other > 1000.
Seems that for MCC these rules are always true, when
the Bad Frames Received for the line of one bridge
are really > 100 or 1000, and also when on a line
of another bridge there are only 7 Bad Frames Received.
Has anyone any idea ???
Thanks in advance,
Ciao Luciano Barilaro
These are examples of rules fired from MCC.
!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Alarm, 17-FEB-1993 15:56:22 !!!!!!!!!!!!!! [3,4]
Domain: DSP_NS:.ALMANET Severity: Minor
Notification Entity: Bridge DSP_NS:.bridge.BET_CIT_1 LINE 2
Event Source: Domain DSP_NS:.ALMANET Rule almanet_BRIDGE_bfr100
Event: OSI Rule Fired
Event Type = QualityofServiceAlarm
Event Time = 17-FEB-1993 15:56:21.60
Probable Cause = Unknown
Additional Info = { (
significance = True,
information = "Rule fired: Bridge
DSP_NS:.bridge.BET_CIT_1 LINE 2
Bad Frames Received = 5085
17-FEB-1993 15:56:19.74" ),
(
significance = True,
information = "(BRIDGE * LINE 2 Bad Frames
Received > 100)" ) }
Managed Object = Bridge DSP_NS:.bridge.BET_CIT_1 LINE
2
Perceived Severity = Minor
!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Alarm, 17-FEB-1993 15:56:25 !!!!!!!!!!!!!! [3,8]
Domain: DSP_NS:.ALMANET Severity: Major
Notification Entity: Bridge DSP_NS:.bridge.BET_CIT_1 LINE 2
Event Source: Domain DSP_NS:.ALMANET Rule almanet_BRIDGE_bfr1000
Event: OSI Rule Fired
Event Type = QualityofServiceAlarm
Event Time = 17-FEB-1993 15:56:25.23
Probable Cause = Unknown
Additional Info = { (
significance = True,
information = "Rule fired: Bridge
DSP_NS:.bridge.BET_CIT_1 LINE 2
Bad Frames Received = 5085
17-FEB-1993 15:56:23.28" ),
(
significance = True,
information = "(BRIDGE * LINE 2 Bad Frames
Received > 1000)" ) }
Managed Object = Bridge DSP_NS:.bridge.BET_CIT_1 LINE
2
Perceived Severity = Major
!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Alarm, 17-FEB-1993 15:56:31 !!!!!!!!!!!!!! [3,16]
Domain: DSP_NS:.ALMANET Severity: Minor
Notification Entity: Bridge DSP_NS:.bridge.BET_ING_2 LINE 2
Event Source: Domain DSP_NS:.ALMANET Rule almanet_BRIDGE_bfr100
Event: OSI Rule Fired
Event Type = QualityofServiceAlarm
Event Time = 17-FEB-1993 15:56:31.19
Probable Cause = Unknown
Additional Info = { (
significance = True,
information = "Rule fired: Bridge
DSP_NS:.bridge.BET_ING_2 LINE 2
Bad Frames Received = 7
17-FEB-1993 15:56:28.81" ),
(
significance = True,
information = "(BRIDGE * LINE 2 Bad Frames
Received > 100)" ) }
Managed Object = Bridge DSP_NS:.bridge.BET_ING_2 LINE
2
Perceived Severity = Minor
!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Alarm, 17-FEB-1993 15:56:34 !!!!!!!!!!!!!! [3,21]
Domain: DSP_NS:.ALMANET Severity: Major
Notification Entity: Bridge DSP_NS:.bridge.BET_ING_2 LINE 2
Event Source: Domain DSP_NS:.ALMANET Rule almanet_BRIDGE_bfr1000
Event: OSI Rule Fired
Event Type = QualityofServiceAlarm
Event Time = 17-FEB-1993 15:56:33.73
Probable Cause = Unknown
Additional Info = { (
significance = True,
information = "Rule fired: Bridge
DSP_NS:.bridge.BET_ING_2 LINE 2
Bad Frames Received = 7
17-FEB-1993 15:56:32.34" ),
(
significance = True,
information = "(BRIDGE * LINE 2 Bad Frames
Received > 1000)" ) }
Managed Object = Bridge DSP_NS:.bridge.BET_ING_2 LINE
2
Perceived Severity = Major
| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 4611.1 | Fixed in DECmcc 1.3 | TRM::KWAK | | Fri Feb 26 1993 08:59 | 10 |
|
RE: .0
Please see topic #3720.
The problem was in the Alarms FM's (DECmcc V1.2) handling of the
Bridge counter attributes which were 48-bit or 64-bit integer values.
The fix had been made in DECmcc 1.3.
William
|
| 4611.2 | Possibilities on 1.2 | MLNCSC::BARILARO | | Fri Feb 26 1993 09:48 | 11 |
| Hi William,
Thanks for your prompt reply, do you know if exist a patch
or is it possible to use the v1.3 ALARM image on MCC v1.2 ??
This just in case the customer doesn't want to accept to
wait until next release .
Thanks in advance
Ciao Luciano
|
| 4611.3 | | GOSTE::CALLANDER | | Mon Mar 29 1993 18:49 | 2 |
| you can use the 1.3 as long as it is VMS
|