| Title: | DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT. |
| Notice: | Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187 |
| Moderator: | TAEC::BEROUD |
| Created: | Mon Aug 21 1989 |
| Last Modified: | Wed Jun 04 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 6497 |
| Total number of notes: | 27359 |
I didn't succeed to register a PC DOS with PATHWORKS (DECNET) FOR DOS V4.1 in DECMCC. Previously, i loaded NML as a TSR and after i could use: NCP TELL "PCnode" command to do remote management function in the PC. I saw that when i ask to register the PC, 2 DECNET links exist between the PC and the DECMCC station. Does anyone try/succeed in registering PC/DECNET in DECMCC ? Thanks for the answers. Regards, Bernard
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4579.1 | Just did NML and it worked. | PTOVAX::DANZAK | Pittsburgher � | Fri Feb 19 1993 14:10 | 6 |
I just did a NML at the C: prompt and MCC was able to see it and
register it....if that helps....
Regards,
j
| |||||
| 4579.2 | Be sure to UNLOAD NML to save your memory. | CUJO::HILL | Dan Hill-Net.Mgt.-Customer Resident | Thu Feb 25 1993 01:00 | 16 |
NML takes up about 25K of 640K memory, if my memory servers me. Your
PC users might get a bit upset if you keep NML loaded. Once
registered, type NML/U from the DOS prompt to unload NML.
Now, once the node is registered, you can set up a DECnet remote sink
on a router node in the same area as the PCs. You can monitor DECnet
events via the routers and sink them to the MCC station.
By assigning targets, you can then have the PC icons change color.
Without a TSR (Terminate and Stay Resident) agent, such as NML, on the
PC, you can't get much more than that.
By the way, you can register the PC using the STATION AM.
-Dan
| |||||
| 4579.3 | Pathworks patch fixes NML problem | CUJO::HILL | Dan Hill-Net.Mgt.-Customer Resident | Thu Feb 25 1993 01:01 | 4 |
Be sure to use Pathworks V4.2 which includes a patch to fix a problem
with NML.
-dh.
| |||||
| 4579.4 | 4.2 or 4.1a ? | ROM01::PROFETI | Livia EIS Rome | Fri Mar 05 1993 07:34 | 7 |
RE .3
Are you sure the 4.2 is needed ?
I knew the 4.1a was sufficient, is it not true ?
Livia
| |||||
| 4579.5 | 4.1A is ok | HADRES::KRAUSE | European NewProductEngineer for MCC | Mon Mar 08 1993 04:46 | 4 |
4.1A included the fix and therefore is sufficient. But 4.2 is the latest and greatest... *Robert | |||||
| 4579.6 | 4.1 a => OK | MARS03::THOMAS | Tue Mar 09 1993 05:08 | 6 | |
Yes i agree. The customer used PATHWORKS V4.1. We did the 4.1A
upgrade and now it is working.
Bye
| |||||