| Title: | DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT. |
| Notice: | Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187 |
| Moderator: | TAEC::BEROUD |
| Created: | Mon Aug 21 1989 |
| Last Modified: | Wed Jun 04 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 6497 |
| Total number of notes: | 27359 |
I have a problem in a network with DECmcc and Cisco Routers.
DECmcc is running 1.2.3 and the Cisco Routers are running 8.3.58
There are around 30 routers in the network all running the same
software version. Some are AGS+, some CGS and some IGS routers.
The problem is that the SNMP traps from some routers are not seen
by the DECmcc station. So some routers' traps ae seen and some are
not sen by the DECmcc station. About 4 or five Routers' traps are
seen and the remaining 20 odd routers' traps are not seen by
DECmcc. The interseting thing is the 4 or 5 routers whose traps
are seen now by DECmcc are not seen by DECmcc the next day or after
a few hours.
There is no pattern such as IGS or CGS or AGS+ routers' whose traps
are not seen. There are no bridges in the path that are doing any
filtering.
I traced the packets from one router whose trap is seen and the
packets from one router whose traps are not seen by DECmcc. The
IP address of the one whose traps are seen is 161.117.120.254
and the one whose traps are not seen by DECmcc is 161.117.248.2
The traces are in the DEFAULT DECNET DIRECTORY of a node called
RIPPER and the file name is TELECOM.LIS
Any suggestions please
Any suggestions please
Any suggestions please.
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4444.1 | No answer, but same problem | ADO75A::BOUCHER | Tue Jan 26 1993 03:17 | 11 | |
I have the same problem with one AGS+ and 23 IGS/R routers. They are
all running 9.0(1.10). The routers are configured for the following:
snmp-server community public RW
snmp-server trap-authentication
snmp-server host 159.13.96.6 public snmp tty (address of DECmcc)
The network is running DECnet and TCP/IP over a private X.25 network.
Reece Boucher
SWS
Adelaide, Australia
| |||||
| 4444.2 | MOLAR::YAHEY::BOSE | Tue Jan 26 1993 09:58 | 19 | ||
It is possible that the encoding of the trap PDU is such that the SNMP AM is rejecting them as bad PDUs. This seems more likely when you consider the fact that this seems to happen only for traps generated by a particular agent only. You can find out if the traps were accepted by the SNMP AM's event sink by issuing the following command : MCC> SHOW MCC 0 TCPIP_AM SINK ALL COUNTERS This will give you a count of the traps received and their types. If you see the count going up, but the events not appearing in DECmcc, then this could be a different (and more serious) problem. Could you also send me an ASN.1 dump of the trap PDU so that I may figure out if it is following the SNMP protocol. Rahul. | |||||
| 4444.3 | AGENT NOT REGISTERED WITH SERIAL PORT IP ADDRESSES | GIDDAY::STANISLAUS | Tue Jan 26 1993 22:38 | 7 | |
This fault turned out to be due to the fact that all agents where registered with their IP address of the Ethernet Port. Once we registered the IP address of the serial port it was all OK. We found this by tracing the data with the LANanalyzer. Alphonse | |||||