| Title: | DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT. |
| Notice: | Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187 |
| Moderator: | TAEC::BEROUD |
| Created: | Mon Aug 21 1989 |
| Last Modified: | Wed Jun 04 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 6497 |
| Total number of notes: | 27359 |
Is it planned in a next version of the SNMP AM to implement the new security mechanism described in the following RFCs : - 1351 SNMP administrative model - 1352 SNMP security protocols - 1353 Mib for asministration of SNMP parties The way DECmcc manage proxy entities is currently based on the cummunity name (used as the selector on the proxy agent side) but as far as I know this is not defined in any standard document, is it ? The above RFCs pinpoint such a mean by defining partie's profiles. any comment ? Christophe
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4347.1 | Phased approach probably | SKIBUM::GASSMAN | Thu Jan 07 1993 11:25 | 8 | |
The next release of the SNMP AM is V1.3, coming out in a few months.
It does not support SNMP V2 (which includes the security bits). It is
a priority 2 requirement to support it in V1.4, but Phase 0 has not
closed yet. It would be nice to have "something", and more in the
release after V1.4. The market will probably be visable within a few
months, and growing by the fall, and required by this time next year.
bill
| |||||