T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
4286.1 | How? | 2582::DFLAT::PLOUFFE | Jerry | Fri Dec 18 1992 13:12 | 3 |
| How did the DAP LOAD command fail? What was the error message?
- Jerry
|
4286.2 | | RACER::dave | Ahh, but fortunately, I have the key to escape reality. | Fri Dec 18 1992 13:57 | 28 |
| The following is a list of verbs (and their codes) that start with "RE"
VERB_RESET 5
VERB_RESUME 17
VERB_REMOVE 25
VERB_REGISTER 29
VERB_RESTRICT 32
VERB_RENAME 34
VERB_REVOKE 81
VERB_REPAIR 83
VERB_READ_EVENT 84
VERB_RECORD 106
VERB_RESUME_RECORDING 110
VERB_RESTORE 112
VERB_RESUME_EXPORTING 117
VERB_RESERVED_148 148
VERB_RESERVED_155 155
VERB_RELEASE 204
VERB_RELOAD 251
VERB_REASSIGN 343
VERB_RELOCATE 344
VERB_RESERVE 345
VERB_RETENSION 346
VERB_RECATALOG 358
Note that there is no "RESTART" in the list. Also, please note that
one cannot just "use" any old number, as these definitions are "global"
in the MCC view. If you want to add new verbs, you need to register the value
with the DSSR.
|
4286.3 | Are you using the TeMIP dictionnary ? | TAEC::BACCAR | | Mon Dec 21 1992 08:00 | 12 |
| Hi,
Are you using the TeMIP dictionnary ?. If yes, we already define the verb
restart for debug purpose, so use the same MCC_K_VERB_RESTART value as us, that
is 206 with the V1.0 TeMIP SSB dictionnary ( check using the mcc_dap > show class
operation_context directive restart ).
Regards ,
Hedi
----
|
4286.4 | MAJOR PROBLEM... | RACER::dave | Ahh, but fortunately, I have the key to escape reality. | Mon Dec 21 1992 13:50 | 2 |
| The list of registered verbs that I have has SESSION TRACE registered
as being at 206. If TEMIP is using the value, it is seriously broken.
|
4286.5 | | TOOK::MATTHEWS | | Mon Dec 21 1992 15:27 | 6 |
| I would strongly suggest not using "unregistered" codes. Based upon
what I am reading here we have an example of what happens when
you do so. We need to get all the users of verb codes to register
their codes or we can not integrate our modules at the customer site.
wally
|
4286.6 | | TAEC::FLAUW | | Tue Dec 22 1992 02:57 | 20 |
|
re: .4 and .5
The 2 previous notes are right. The directive RESTART that we used was a
debug directive which is undocumented and therefore didn't get registered
which explains why it doesn't have a new unique code.
All the other entities and directives that we are using are registered
and got unique codes from DECmcc registry.
The omission for the RESTART directive was pointed to us by the DECmcc
registry, unfortunately too late to correct it in V1.0.
For V1.1, we have decided to remove this directive from our MSLs, so
please ignore note 4286.3. Code 206 is the code of SESSION TRACE and
not RESTART.
Best regards,
Marc.
|