T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
4271.1 | Trace........
| KERNEL::DAVIES | | Thu Dec 17 1992 08:43 | 7 |
| I'm getting the customer to set up a trace with the MCC_FCL_PM_LOG.
Still waiting for the results...................
Cheers,
Phil.
|
4271.2 | | 2582::YAHEY::BOSE | | Thu Dec 17 1992 14:00 | 11 |
|
Does the user have SYSPRV turned on in the process running DECmcc?
Also, are there any other process running on the system which
binds to port 162 ? You can also trying running the sink by hand
and see if it stays up. ($ RUN SYS$SYSTEM:MCC_TCPIP_SINK.EXE).
If it stays up, issue the following DECmcc command to see if the
SNMP AM can communicate with the sink :
MCC> SHOW MCC 0 TCPIP_AM SINK ALL COUNTERS
Rahul.
|
4271.3 | | KERNEL::DAVIES | | Tue Jan 05 1993 10:55 | 17 |
|
Hi,
Sorry about the delay in responding.
The customer is logged in as system and has all privs. If we manually
run MCC_TCPIP_SINK.EXE it stays up ok and the traps are processed.
I am shipping the MCC 1.2.3 Mup to the customer and he's also going to
install UCX V2.0.
I'll keep you posted as to the outcome.
Thanks for your help.
Phil.
|
4271.4 | Same problem...........
| KERNEL::DAVIES | | Mon Feb 01 1993 07:37 | 14 |
|
Hi all,
My customer has upgraded his system to MCC BMS V1.2.3 and UCX V2.0
and he still has the same problem where TRAPS are not being processed.
Again, if he hand cranks the tcpip sink process all is ok.
Any help greatly appreciated..........
Regards,
Phil.
|
4271.5 | | MOLAR::YAHEY::BOSE | | Mon Feb 01 1993 13:16 | 8 |
|
What is the duration he is specifying in his getevent directive?
If he is still specifying 10 seconds (00:10) he cannot expect
the sink to stay up for too long (or get any traps out of DECmcc).
Ask him to try the command without the duration qualifier.
rb.
|
4271.6 | | KERNEL::DAVIES | | Tue Feb 02 1993 12:07 | 10 |
|
Hi,
The syntax used in the getevent command is posted in the base note
(4271). The duration is 10 minutes.
Any other ideas anyone?
Phil.
|
4271.7 | | MOLAR::YAHEY::BOSE | | Tue Feb 02 1993 19:25 | 7 |
|
Ooops! The duration is indeed 10 minutes and not 10 seconds.
The only explanation I can think of is that the event pool
may be corrupt. But rebooting the system should have got rid
of the problem.
Rahul.
|
4271.8 | mcc_fcl_pm_log 8 | GOSTE::CALLANDER | | Fri Feb 05 1993 13:26 | 2 |
| what happened with the fcl log?
|
4271.9 | pb with MCC_TCPIP_SINK process | MLNCSC::LASAGNA | NO!, le scarpe no !! | Fri Feb 26 1993 04:41 | 89 |
| Hi,
I opened a new topic because this has become an emergency
a customer of ours has the same problem of note 4271
MCC_TCPIP_SINK dies after receiving the first trap.
Also in my case the only infos I get from accounting
is a "Final status code: 03268009", the mcc_tcpip_sink.err
file is always empty.
I defined the MCC_FCL_PM_LOG to 8 and these're the results.
Trying to reproduce the problem in our mcc system here ,we now
have the the same behaviour !!!
for anyone who can help i can give complete access to my
system.
Are there any news about this problem, is there an open QAR ???
Thanks in advance for any help,
Ciao Andrea Lasagna.
Gundam > DEFINE MCC_FCL_PM_LOG 8
Gundam > MANA/ENTER
DECmcc (V1.2.0)
MCC> GETEVENT SNMP * ANY EVENT
*****************************************************
* FCL PM Arguments before call_function: *
*****************************************************
VERB code: 65
PARTITION code: 15
AES dump of ENTITY IN:
Depth=0 Class = 18 Instance = No curlen Id = 0 Dt = 0
ILV dump of IN_P: in_p is NULL
ILV dump of IN_Q: in_q is NULL
TIME SPEC is: 0, NOW
**********************************************
FCL PM Arguments on return from call_function:
CVR returned:
%MCC-S-RESPONSE, success with response reply
ILV dump of OUT_P:
[ 1 ] (
[ 1 ] (
[ 0 ] (
[ 1 ] 31 2e 33 2e 36 2e 31 2e 34 2e 31 2e 33 36 2e 31 -- 1.3.6.1.4.1.36.1
[ 2 ] 10 c0 10 0d
[ 3 ] 00
[ 4 ] 00
[ 5 ] 01 99 e8 b8
)
)
)
AES dump of ENTITY OUT:
Depth=0 Class = 18 Instance = GUNDAM_NS:.ip.lasa Id = 97 Dt = 5
SNMP GUNDAM_NS:.ip.lasa
AT 25-FEB-1993 15:34:56 Any Event
Successfully received event(s):
Event: coldStart
A coldStart trap was received:
enterprise = "1.3.6.1.4.1.36.1"
agent-addr = 16.192.16.13
generic-trap = coldStart
specific-trap = 0
time-stamp = 26863800
MCC> SPAWN
Gundam > SH PROC MCC_TCPIP_SINK <--- The process is died
%SYSTEM-W-NONEXPR, nonexistent process
|
4271.10 | | MOLAR::PERRY | | Fri Feb 26 1993 11:52 | 21 |
| Andrea,
The MCC_TCPIP_SINK process is only active when there are outstanding
getevent requests. Once the last getevent request completes, the sink
terminates normally.
In your particular example, the getevent was issued without a duration.
Therefore, the first event you received caused your getevent to complete.
Since there weren't any other getevents outstanding, the MCC_TCPIP_SINK
terminated (normally). The next getevent you issue will cause the
MCC_TCPIP_SINK process to be started again.
If you want you receive multiple events per getevent request, then
provide a duration.
Hope this helps.
Jim
|
4271.11 | Another MCC_TCPIP_SINK process death... | CUJO::HILL | Dan Hill-Net.Mgt.-Customer Resident | Tue Mar 02 1993 00:06 | 21 |
| Greetings, all,
Before I QAR this, I just want to be sure I haven't done anything
wrong.
MCC> GETEVENT SNMP * hp any configuration event, for duration 00:01:00
or
MCC> GETEVENT SNMP * ANY CONFIGURATION EVENT, for duration 00:01:00
Both yeild the following error:
"The Event Sink was started successfully, but is not currently
communicating."
MCC>
Any traps I generate are not received. Every once in a while, through
persistence, I can get it to work. If I do have a corrupted event
pool, what has caused this, and what are the best ways to prevent such
and occurrence in the future?
-Dan
|
4271.12 | What about when using the MCC_EVC_SINK? | LMASTR::W_MCGAW | | Wed Feb 02 1994 17:52 | 9 |
| Is anyone aware of a problem with the MCC_TCPIP_SINK process and
the MCC_EVC_SINK process running at the same time? I ran into a
problem where the TCPIP traps would not be received (intermittently) if
the MCC_EVC_SINK process was running at the same time. If we did not
start the MCC_EVC_SINK, then the TCPIP traps were always received
correctly.
Thanks,
Walt
|
4271.13 | regarding tcpip_sink and evc_sink | CSC32::W_MCGAW | | Fri Feb 04 1994 16:49 | 4 |
| BTW, the previous note is pertaining to DECmcc-BMS V1.3 on a VMS V5.5-2
system.
Walt
|
4271.14 | RT <release notes>, then RTM | SCCA::dave | Ahh, but fortunately, I have the key to escape reality. | Fri Feb 04 1994 18:46 | 3 |
| Its documented in the release notes, I believe. Change the EVC socket number.
The manual describes exactly how.
|
4271.15 | Have RT release notes and Manual... What now? | LMASTR::W_MCGAW | | Mon Feb 07 1994 12:34 | 25 |
| re: .14
>Its documented in the release notes, I believe. Change the EVC socket number.
>The manual describes exactly how.
Hi Dave,
I looked in the release notes for Polycenter Network Manager 200 and
couldn't find anything about the EVC sink and the TCPIP sink working
together. I also looked in the Alarms manual under the collector_am
section but there isn't any detail about changing or selecting the
port number for UDPIP for a VMS operating system. It refers you to
the TCP/IP Services for VMS software but that isn't very straight
forward either.
I went ahead and setup my node to get TCPIP traps and also started up
the collection_am udpip sink. When I went into UCX and showed the
device sockets, I found that the EVC sink process for UDPIP did use
port 1630 as the manual states. The TCPIP sink process was using port
162. I don't understand the conflict here. Could you please provide
some more detail as to why I need to change the port for the collector
UDPIP sink and also how to do this under VMS?
Thanks,
Walt
|
4271.16 | Problem with TCPIP sink in T1.4 | NYOSS1::PLUNKETT | | Mon Mar 13 1995 23:19 | 14 |
| I've got another dying sink problem. If I do a getevent directive
out of the FCL, the sink process gets created, then dies with a
final status code of 03268009. You don't get the MCC prompt back
after the process dies. When you run this through the
f$message lexical, you get an ADA-S-NOMSG, Message Number 0031dda9.
Anyways, I'm looking at this from a "UCX must be mis-configured"
point of view, but I can't see where. I've increased my device
sockets to 80, but still no go.
I'm running VMS6.1, MCC T1.4, UCX 3.2, Hubwatch 3.1, all on a 32
Mbyte VAXstation 3100/76.
Any Ideas?
-Craig
|