[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
| Title: | DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT. |
| Notice: | Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187 |
| Moderator: | TAEC::BEROUD |
|
| Created: | Mon Aug 21 1989 |
| Last Modified: | Wed Jun 04 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 6497 |
| Total number of notes: | 27359 |
4226.0. "ELM Installation Problems w/DECmcc V1.2" by MUTTON::LAMB (Peter Lamb - GSG Santa Clara) Wed Dec 09 1992 22:08
Hello,
One of my customers is having difficulty installing ELM
and I am wondering if anyone can offer any suggestions
His message is below.
Regards,
Peter Lamb
From: DECPA::"[email protected]" 9-DEC-1992 07:46:49.06
To: mutton::lamb (Peter Lamb)
CC: [email protected], [email protected]
Subj: Trouble with ELM
Peter, I'm having no luck getting the ELM going. The PAK is
fine, but every time I install the ELM it corrupts the DECmcc
installation.
It's funny; there seem to be no errors during the installation, but
it fails the tests. Here's an example:
It copies the files into the right places, and updates
the dictionaries.
Next it enrolls a few modules.
Then it runs "manage test mcc 0 XXX"
where XXX is conc_am, fddi_am, etc.
For each of those, it gets the following error message:
Disaster IPC server unmarshall input sanity check failure
%MCC-E-RECEIVEERROR, error trying to receive a packet
Then, when I try to start the iconic_map, I get a small
window with basically the same message "Error trying to
receive a packet". Furthermore, all of my domains have
disappeared.
I'm confused, and don't know where to go from here. Can you help,
or should I be calling someone else to help me?
Eric
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by mts-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA05798; Wed, 9 Dec 92 07:45:25 -0800
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA04413; Sun, 6 Dec 92 14:30:19 -0800
% Received: from antares.aero.org by aerospace.aero.org with SMTP (5.65c/6.0.GT) id AA29058 for [email protected]; Sun, 6 Dec 1992 14:29:01 -080
% Posted-Date: Sun, 06 Dec 92 14:28:57 PST
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% Received: from fungus.aero.org by antares.aero.org (4.1/AMS-1.0) id AA11825 for [email protected]; Sun, 6 Dec 92 14:28:59 PS
% To: mutton::lamb (Peter Lamb)
% Subject: Trouble with ELM
% Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
% Date: Sun, 06 Dec 92 14:28:57 PST
% From: [email protected]
| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 4226.1 | What versions? | TOOK::MINTZ | Erik Mintz | Thu Dec 10 1992 07:33 | 8 |
| We need to know what versions (both of BMS and ELM) your customer
is trying to install. It sounds very much as though he is mixing an
early field test with later production code. In that case, it is
very likely that the kernels are incompatible. (On ULTRIX, there are
no shareable libraries, so each image has its own copy of the kernel.
Older code will have an older kernel).
-- Erik
|