[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference azur::mcc

Title:	DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT.
Notice:	Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187
Moderator:	TAEC::BEROUD

Created:	Mon Aug 21 1989
Last Modified:	Wed Jun 04 1997
Last Successful Update:	Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:	6497
Total number of notes:	27359

4191.0. "VBAM 2.2 Support ALL TLs?" by MAIL::CLAYTON (Merlin Clayton DTN 445-7217) Thu Dec 03 1992 14:11

Can someone familiar with the VBAM AM please answer a couple of questions for 
me.

Q.  Does the VBAM for V 1.2 of DECmcc DIR which is currently in field test
    support ALL TransLAN bridges (TLII, TLIII, TL3xx)?

Q.  Is the level of support of V1.2 VBAM consistent with V1.1 VBAM?
    Specifically, are the parameters that can be "SET" vs "SHOWn" the same?
    Any enhancements to the list of parameters from V1.1, or are there any
    parameters that have been taken off of the V1.1 list?

Q.  Will VBAM V1.2 be DECmcc Dir V1.3 and beyond, or will customers be in the
    same situation with VBAM V1.2 and mcc Dir 1.3 that they were with VBAM
    V1.1 and mcc Dir 1.2?

I have an immediate sale of a DECmcc turnkey system and consulting services
hanging on the answers to these questions surrounding Vitalink's VBAM.  So
I need information ASAP.

Thanks.

Merlin

T.R Title User Personal
Name Date Lines

4191.1 how's this? TOOK::MCPHERSON pre-retinal integration Thu Dec 03 1992 14:45 27

T.R	Title	User	Personal Name	Date	Lines
4191.1	how's this?	TOOK::MCPHERSON	pre-retinal integration	`Thu Dec 03 1992 14:45`	27
	>Q. Does the VBAM for V 1.2 of DECmcc DIR which is currently in field test > support ALL TransLAN bridges (TLII, TLIII, TL3xx)? A: Yes. >Q. Is the level of support of V1.2 VBAM consistent with V1.1 VBAM? > Specifically, are the parameters that can be "SET" vs "SHOWn" the same? > Any enhancements to the list of parameters from V1.1, or are there any > parameters that have been taken off of the V1.1 list? A: Same as for V1.1. I.e. no AM 'enhancements' & no 'defacements' ;^) >Q. Will VBAM V1.2 be DECmcc Dir V1.3 and beyond, or will customers be in the > same situation with VBAM V1.2 and mcc Dir 1.3 that they were with VBAM > V1.1 and mcc Dir 1.2? A: VBAM 1.2 will work with DECmcc V1.2 or DECmcc V1.3 for VMS. > >Thanks. > You're welcome, you high-strung leatherneck jarhead.... ;^) /doug

>Q.  Does the VBAM for V 1.2 of DECmcc DIR which is currently in field test
>    support ALL TransLAN bridges (TLII, TLIII, TL3xx)?

	A:  Yes.

>Q.  Is the level of support of V1.2 VBAM consistent with V1.1 VBAM?
>    Specifically, are the parameters that can be "SET" vs "SHOWn" the same?
>    Any enhancements to the list of parameters from V1.1, or are there any
>    parameters that have been taken off of the V1.1 list?


	A: Same as for V1.1.  I.e. no AM 'enhancements' & no 'defacements' ;^)


>Q.  Will VBAM V1.2 be DECmcc Dir V1.3 and beyond, or will customers be in the
>    same situation with VBAM V1.2 and mcc Dir 1.3 that they were with VBAM
>    V1.1 and mcc Dir 1.2?

	A:  VBAM 1.2 will work with DECmcc V1.2 or DECmcc V1.3 for VMS.

>
>Thanks.
>

	You're welcome, you high-strung leatherneck jarhead.... ;^)

/doug