T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
4080.1 | SNMP AM question for DECmcc engineers | YAHEY::BOSE | | Thu Nov 12 1992 17:49 | 5 |
|
We have seen similar problems where Alarms and SNMP AM hangs with
TGV's Multinet software. This is currently under investigtion.
/rb
|
4080.2 | I am aware of the TGV problems. | CX3PT3::SHOTO::W_MCGAW | | Fri Nov 13 1992 10:54 | 6 |
| Yes, I know. I have CLD'd the customer in question for both an alarm
rule problem and also graphing of SNMP entities that appears to just
suspend even though the man in the graph box is still in the running
state.
Walt
|
4080.3 | More information on the TGV problem from the customer | CX3PT1::SHOTO::W_MCGAW | | Mon Nov 16 1992 16:12 | 166 |
| Hi,
This is an extract from a workunit the customer sent to me concerning
the alarm rule and graph problems with TGV Multinet IP transport.
I thought this might be helpful and if there is anything you would like
to have the customer try, please let me know.
Walt
\+----------------------- Beginning of Screener's Text -----------------------+
\MCC 1.2 graphing and private MIB woes
\** This call created by the customer using DSNlink for VMS.
\** This is additional information to the call owned by 115220
\+--------------------------- End of Screener's Text --------------------------+
---------< This work unit was entered by DSNlink - 137 lines >----------
From: (76977) KUHUB::PAUL "Craig Paul (16-NOV-1992 14:33)"
To: DSN%SRQ$C921028-1299
Subj: RE: MCC 1.2 graphing and private MIB woes
System KUHUB is a VAX 9000-210 running VMS V5.5-1.
(HW Ver=00B00000000000040E84116E, SID=0E84116E, XSID=00000101)
Walt (DEC) and Bruce (TGV)
I ran a second DECterm session on the workstation that runs MCC 1.2
and used TGV/Multinet's tcpdump to watch snmp output.
I used CMU's snmp package for VMS (converted by TGV) to issue some snmp
commands and watched the packets get displayed by tcpdump just fine.
Then I went into MCC and typed
show snmp midnet-gw.cc.ukans.edu proteon xface peth, via port 4, in domain
midnet
and saw NO snmp packets issued, yet a few seconds later I got the
attribute not getable window-full
(In line mode I see)
MCC> show snmp midnet-gw.cc.ukans.edu proteon xface peth, via port 4,-
_MCC> in domain midnet
Using default ALL IDENTIFIERS
SNMP midnet-gw.cc.ukans.edu proteon xface peth
AT 16-NOV-1992 14:25:26 Identifiers
Examination of attributes shows:
MCC>
Yet
MCC> show snmp midnet-gw.cc.ukans.edu proteon admin status all attributes,-
_MCC> in domain midnet
SNMP midnet-gw.cc.ukans.edu proteon admin status
AT 16-NOV-1992 14:26:53 All Attributes
proAdminStatusCrashMsg =
%X52656C6F6164656400202020202020202020
20202020202020202020202020202020202020
20202020202020202020202020202020202020
2020202020202020
proAdminStatusReloadTime = 112308000
proAdminStatusStarts = 5
proAdminStatusCrashes = 0
MCC>
During those last two snmp requests from MCC here's the tcpdump that I see
$ tcpdump/hex/snap=1536 port snmp
14:29:34.64 midnet-gw.cc.ukans.edu.snmp > bali.cc.ukans.edu.3341:
GetResponse(12
3) system.sysUpTime.0=104077991 system.sysDescr.0="Portable MC68020 C Gateway
"KU Proteon" S/N 263 V11.0d [ " system.sysObjectID.0=E:proteon.1.1.42
4500 00a7 0483 0000 3b11 74dd 81ed 0105 E.......;.t.....
81ed 0107 00a1 0d0d 0093 167c 3081 8802 ...........|0...
0100 0406 7075 626c 6963 a27b 0201 0102 ....public.{....
0100 0201 0030 7030 1006 082b 0601 0201 .....0p0...+....
0103 0043 0406 341a a730 4506 082b 0601 ...C..4..0E..+..
0201 0101 0004 3950 6f72 7461 626c 6520 ......9Portable
4d43 3638 3032 3020 4320 4761 7465 7761 MC68020 C Gatewa
7920 224b 5520 5072 6f74 656f 6e22 2053 y "KU Proteon" S
2f4e 2032 3633 2056 3131 2e30 6420 5b20 /N 263 V11.0d [
3015 0608 2b06 0102 0101 0200 0609 2b06 0...+.........+.
0104 0101 0101 2a ......*
14:29:34.74 bali.cc.ukans.edu.3341 > midnet-gw.cc.ukans.edu.snmp:
GetRequest(29)
E:proteon.1.2.4.0
4500 004c 6cfa 0000 3c11 0bc1 81ed 0107 E..Ll...<.......
81ed 0105 0d0d 00a1 0038 2c99 3082 002c .........8,.0..,
0201 0004 0670 7562 6c69 63a0 8200 1d02 .....public.....
0102 0201 0002 0100 3012 3082 000e 060a ........0.0.....
2b06 0104 0101 0102 0400 0500 +...........
14:29:34.74 midnet-gw.cc.ukans.edu.snmp > bali.cc.ukans.edu.3341:
GetResponse(91
)
E:proteon.1.2.4.0=52_65_6c_6f_61_64_65_64_0_20_20_20_20_20_20_20_20_20_20_20_2
0_20_20_20_20_20_20_20_20_20_20_20_20_20_20_20_20_20_20_20_20_20_20_20_20_20_2
0_
20_20_20_20_20_20_20_20_20_20_20_20_20_20_20_20_20
4500 0086 0484 0000 3b11 74fd 81ed 0105 E.......;.t.....
81ed 0107 00a1 0d0d 0072 880c 3068 0201 .........r..0h..
0004 0670 7562 6c69 63a2 5b02 0102 0201 ...public.[.....
0002 0100 3050 304e 060a 2b06 0104 0101 ....0P0N..+.....
0102 0400 0440 5265 6c6f 6164 6564 0020 .....@Reloaded.
2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020
2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020
2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020
2020 2020 2020
14:29:35.17 bali.cc.ukans.edu.3345 > midnet-gw.cc.ukans.edu.snmp:
GetRequest(59)
system.sysUpTime.0 system.sysDescr.0 system.sysObjectID.0
4500 006a 6cfd 0000 3c11 0ba0 81ed 0107 E..jl...<.......
81ed 0105 0d11 00a1 0056 3be7 3082 004a .........V;.0..J
0201 0004 0670 7562 6c69 63a0 8200 3b02 .....public...;.
0101 0201 0002 0100 3030 3082 000c 0608 ........000.....
2b06 0102 0101 0300 0500 3082 000c 0608 +.........0.....
2b06 0102 0101 0100 0500 3082 000c 0608 +.........0.....
2b06 0102 0101 0200 0500 +.........
14:29:35.18 midnet-gw.cc.ukans.edu.snmp > bali.cc.ukans.edu.3345:
GetResponse(12
3) system.sysUpTime.0=104078046 system.sysDescr.0="Portable MC68020 C Gateway
"KU Proteon" S/N 263 V11.0d [ " system.sysObjectID.0=E:proteon.1.1.42
4500 00a7 0485 0000 3b11 74db 81ed 0105 E.......;.t.....
81ed 0107 00a1 0d11 0093 df77 3081 8802 ...........w0...
0100 0406 7075 626c 6963 a27b 0201 0102 ....public.{....
0100 0201 0030 7030 1006 082b 0601 0201 .....0p0...+....
0103 0043 0406 341a de30 4506 082b 0601 ...C..4..0E..+..
0201 0101 0004 3950 6f72 7461 626c 6520 ......9Portable
4d43 3638 3032 3020 4320 4761 7465 7761 MC68020 C Gatewa
7920 224b 5520 5072 6f74 656f 6e22 2053 y "KU Proteon" S
2f4e 2032 3633 2056 3131 2e30 6420 5b20 /N 263 V11.0d [
3015 0608 2b06 0102 0101 0200 0609 2b06 0...+.........+.
0104 0101 0101 2a ......*
14:29:35.20 bali.cc.ukans.edu.3345 > midnet-gw.cc.ukans.edu.snmp:
GetRequest(65)
E:proteon.1.2.1.0 E:proteon.1.2.2.0 E:proteon.1.2.3.0
4500 0070 6cfe 0000 3c11 0b99 81ed 0107 E..pl...<.......
81ed 0105 0d11 00a1 005c 32b6 3082 0050 .........\2.0..P
0201 0004 0670 7562 6c69 63a0 8200 4102 .....public...A.
0102 0201 0002 0100 3036 3082 000e 060a ........060.....
2b06 0104 0101 0102 0100 0500 3082 000e +...........0...
060a 2b06 0104 0101 0102 0200 0500 3082 ..+...........0.
000e 060a 2b06 0104 0101 0102 0300 0500 ....+...........
14:29:35.21 midnet-gw.cc.ukans.edu.snmp > bali.cc.ukans.edu.3345:
GetResponse(65
) E:proteon.1.2.1.0=112326000 E:proteon.1.2.2.0=5 E:proteon.1.2.3.0=0
4500 006c 0486 0000 3b11 7515 81ed 0105 E..l....;.u.....
81ed 0107 00a1 0d11 0058 8017 304e 0201 .........X..0N..
0004 0670 7562 6c69 63a2 4102 0102 0201 ...public.A.....
0002 0100 3036 3012 060a 2b06 0104 0101 ....060...+.....
0102 0100 4304 06b1 f570 300f 060a 2b06 ....C....p0...+.
0104 0101 0102 0200 4101 0530 0f06 0a2b ........A..0...+
0601 0401 0101 0203 0041 0100 .........A..
It was gratifying to see one of my snmp alarms poll a few minutes later.
So it looks as though MCC is not issuing one of the commands to look into
the Proteon private MIB!
|
4080.4 | | YAHEY::BOSE | | Tue Nov 17 1992 14:13 | 25 |
|
>>MCC> show snmp midnet-gw.cc.ukans.edu proteon xface peth, via port 4,-
>>_MCC> in domain midnet
>>Using default ALL IDENTIFIERS
>>SNMP midnet-gw.cc.ukans.edu proteon xface peth
>>AT 16-NOV-1992 14:25:26 Identifiers
>>Examination of attributes shows:
>>So it looks as though MCC is not issuing one of the commands to look into
>>the Proteon private MIB!
The "peth" child entity does not have any identifier attributes.
So the above command does not return any attribute values, nor
does it send out any SNMP requests. The only attributes present for
the child entity are counter attributes. So the above command with
"all counters" will give a different result.
Question about graphing. Can the user do a SHOW operation for the
attributes he is trying to graph?
Rahul.
|
4080.5 | The problem is Proteon's mib. | YAHEY::BOSE | | Thu Nov 19 1992 16:16 | 22 |
|
Walt,
I've finally figured out what the problem is. After talking
with some other folks having the same problem, it has become apparent
that the "peth" object is actually a columnar object with instances.
However, the Proteon mib does not define it as a table object. So,
there is a major mismatch between what the mib says and what the
agent knows.
To make the situation even worse, there are a number of other
tables implemented in the agent, which are not defined as tables in
the mib. As such, the Proteon mib is more or less useless. One of the
requirements that DECmcc imposes on mibs is that they be conformant
with RFC 1212 (Concise Mib Formats). Proteon's mib does not conform
to RFC 1212, and hence is unusable by DECmcc. (I know we did ship it
with our kit, but at that time we were under the impression that the
Proteon agent did not implement any table objects).
The only option is to obtain an RFC 1212 compliant mib from
Proteon and load it into MCC.
Rahul.
|
4080.6 | response to .4 and .5 | CX3PT1::SHOTO::W_MCGAW | | Fri Nov 20 1992 13:34 | 9 |
| Hi Rahul,
Thank's for the reply onthe mib problem. The graphing issue that
was mentioned in an earlier note, is of an intermittent nature.
The graph does start out properly but then stops graphing. I thought
it was very similar to the SNMP alarm rule problem with the TGV
multinet IP transport.
Walt
|
4080.7 | Stack Size? | RACER::dave | Ahh, but fortunately, I have the key to escape reality. | Sat Nov 21 1992 16:12 | 5 |
| One of The "Multinet" problems has been tracked to a lack of stack
space in the am. Bump the stack size and you may find the problem
will go away. The release notes I just saw said to double it from 100 to 200,
but I would be willing to go out on a limb and say that sounds like
overkill with no testing.
|
4080.8 | | YAHEY::BOSE | | Wed Nov 25 1992 11:58 | 13 |
|
Walt,
I think we have found the solution to the alarms and
graph hang problem. The fix will be in 1.3 (which is going to
field test soon).
As for the Proteon mib problem, we intend to work with
Proteon regarding this and come up with a solution. Please convey
this message to your customer so that he may rest easy.
Rahul.
|
4080.9 | Belated thank you | CX3PT2::SHOTO::W_MCGAW | | Fri Jan 22 1993 12:04 | 9 |
| Hi, sorry I took so long to respond...
As for reply .7, the stack size had been increased as the release notes
point out but that didn't have any effect.
As for .8, thanks Rahul! I will follow up with the customer on both
counts.
Walt
|