T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
4079.1 | Is the rule on a Wellfleet Router ? | NANOVX::ROBERTS | Keith Roberts - Network Management Applications | Fri Nov 13 1992 09:41 | 10 |
| There was a problem found in a wellfleet router .. when there are a lot
of data requests on the router, it will return bad data to the SNMP AM.
This bad data causes SNMP to return a 'Specialized Exception' to PA,
and then Alarms which displays the 'Software Logic Error: Specialized
Exception'.
Are there a lot of 'things' going on with this SNMP device ? Like a lot
of alarm rules and historian and exporter requests ?
/keith
|
4079.2 | Box is CISCO, not Wellfleet | CX3PT3::SHOTO::W_MCGAW | | Fri Nov 13 1992 10:47 | 10 |
| Hi Keith,
The box the customer is alarming against is a CISCO box. I don't believe
there is a lot of activity going on with the box but I will check with
the customer to make sure. I did ask the customer to to do an equivalent
SHOW SNMP command to see if any other error information can be obtained
(this was requested by Stella Ko). I also forgot to mention earlier that
this customer is using TGV Multinet IP transport.
Walt
|
4079.3 | So the Wellfleet bug is out | NANOVX::ROBERTS | Keith Roberts - Network Management Applications | Fri Nov 13 1992 11:22 | 15 |
| So the Wellfleet bug is out.
In v1.2 there was a bug in PA which caused incorrectly architeched responses
to be returned to the Alarms FM. This pretty much means that *any* error
which PA gets from the AM responsible for gathering counter data (in your
case the SNMP AM) is incorrectly passed up the call chain; to Alarms.
Alarms, receiving the ill-formed response gets confused, thus displaying the
'software logic error, ...'
The good news .. PA has been fixed for v1.3
The bad news .. I can not think of any workarounds for v1.2
/keith
|
4079.4 | How soon for V1.3 | CX3PT1::SHOTO::W_MCGAW | | Mon Nov 16 1992 16:16 | 6 |
| Hi Keith,
Well, at least I can tell the customer something. He is out on
vacation until 30-NOV-1992... Any chance of V1.3 shipping by then???
Walt
|
4079.5 | v1.3 Field test should be out soon | NANOVX::ROBERTS | Keith Roberts - Network Management Applications | Mon Nov 16 1992 16:34 | 8 |
|
> Well, at least I can tell the customer something. He is out on
> vacation until 30-NOV-1992... Any chance of V1.3 shipping by then???
DECmcc v1.3 *FIELD TEST* should be out soon ... but the SSB date isn't
until January-93 I believe.
/keith
|
4079.6 | Is the MUP for BMS V1.2 a fix??? | CX3PT1::SHOTO::W_MCGAW | | Tue Nov 17 1992 10:57 | 6 |
| Hi Keith,
I understand that is a MUP for BMS V1.2. Is this something that would address
the problem we are seeing or is this for other issues?
Walt
|
4079.7 | | NANOVX::ROBERTS | Keith Roberts - Network Management Applications | Tue Nov 17 1992 15:01 | 9 |
| RE: .6
> I understand that is a MUP for BMS V1.2. Is this something that would address
> the problem we are seeing or is this for other issues?
Walt - the v1.2 MUP will not contain the bug fixes to PA described in this
note. Sorry 8(
/keith
|
4079.8 | MUP=V1.2.3 | TOOK::MINTZ | LKG2-2 near pole X3, cube 6072, dtn 226-5033 | Tue Nov 17 1992 15:11 | 3 |
| And to avoid confusion, the MUP is called V1.2.3,
and I believe the SSB is shipping it as V1.2a
|