| Title: | DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT. |
| Notice: | Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187 |
| Moderator: | TAEC::BEROUD |
| Created: | Mon Aug 21 1989 |
| Last Modified: | Wed Jun 04 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 6497 |
| Total number of notes: | 27359 |
Hi there.
The implementation of SNMP agent for VMS supports MIB I and MIB II.
I think that the same is true for SNMP agent on ULTRIX (RISC).
Are both implementations 100% full compliant , or they have some DEC
proprietary MIB's ?
Do you know here I can find more information on that ?
/rgds
a.m.
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4067.1 | Which agent? | RACER::dave | Ahh, but fortunately, I have the key to escape reality. | Wed Nov 11 1992 17:58 | 23 |
Which agent on Ultrix? There is the standard agent, which is MIB II compliant, and I believe that that implies Mib I compliant, as the only removed attributes are marked as "deprecated" in MIB II, not actually removed. There is the Common Agent MIB II MOM (INET MOM), which is also MIB II compliant, but it need not run on the system. The user has a choice of what MOM's are run, and need not include MIB II. FWIW: The UCX V2.x agent is based on a very early common agent code base, but dont expect it to be extensible, like CA is. If any of the agents have DEC proprietary extensions, thats OK, they can still be 100% MIB II compliant, as MIB II only specifies a minimum of what needs to be done, and does not limit you. I happen to run the CA INET MOM and a few other MOM's for returning information on disks and process data. My system is still 100% MIB II compliant. | |||||
| 4067.2 | Thanks for your help. | MONTEZ::MONTEZ | The impossible takes a litle longer... | Thu Nov 12 1992 05:38 | 1 |