[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference azur::mcc

Title:DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT.
Notice:Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187
Moderator:TAEC::BEROUD
Created:Mon Aug 21 1989
Last Modified:Wed Jun 04 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:6497
Total number of notes:27359

3947.0. "MCC EMS V2.2 INSTALLATION FAILURE" by PARVAX::STORM () Thu Oct 22 1992 16:18

HI All,

I have a VAXstation 4000.60
VMS 5.5
40Mb Memory
EMS V2.2

I tried installing the SSB version of DECMCC EMS (upgrade from BMS V1.2.7)
on this system from the SSB distribution kit.  This software was not pulled 
off the network.  I am running with local MIR, no DNS.

All the MCC ivp fails with the following error:

DECmcc (V1.2.1)

Invalid MCC_TDF or SYS$TIMEZONE_DIFFERENTIAL logical
%MCC-E-FW_INTERNAL_ERR, Internal framework error
%MCC-F-TRM_FAILURE, PM unable to continue
%MCC-F-TRM_FAILURE, PM unable to continue
%MCC-F-TRM_FAILURE, PM unable to continue

   The following command failed.

      "MANAGE/ENTERPRISE TEST MCC 0, TO FILE = MCCBMS$OUT.TXT"

   DECmcc BMS V1.2.2  Installation Failed


%MCC-F-FAILED, fatal DECmcc error


I also get the following when executing the startup files:

1 - Startup procedure for DECmcc TCP/IP DA FM running.

    DECmcc (V1.2.1)

    %MCC-E-LMF_FAILED, license check failed

    
2 -         The startup procedure for the DECmcc Terminal Server
                 Access Module V1.0.0 is now running.

DECmcc (V1.2.1)


Invalid MCC_TDF or SYS$TIMEZONE_DIFFERENTIAL logical
%MCC-E-FW_INTERNAL_ERR, Internal framework error
%TRACE-E-TRACEBACK, symbolic stack dump follows
module name     routine name        line        rel PC    abs PC
					        000D3AB9  000D3AB9
						0007492A  0007492A
						00085B91  00085B91
						000DA363  000DA363
						000D3118  000D3118
						000D3266  000D3266
						004C2965  004C2965
						00496579  00496579
						000BD799  000BD799
						000BD4D3  000BD4D3
						000BD2CB  000BD2CB
						001CBEBA  001CBEBA
						001CB199  001CB199
						001CA6DB  001CA6DB
						001CC2C1  001CC2C1
						001CB212  001CB212
						001CA6DB  001CA6DB
						001C7608  001C7608
						001C5E0C  001C5E0C
						000C5076  000C5076
MCC_MAIN        main                  7655      00000189  00002035
						0000596F  0000596F
MCC_KERNEL_INIT MCC_KERNEL_INITIALIZE  163      00000027  000059A3
						0000594A  0000594A
%MCC-F-MIR_INIT_FAIL, the MIR could not be initialized
Invalid MCC_TDF or SYS$TIMEZONE_DIFFERENTIAL logical
%MCC-E-FW_INTERNAL_ERR, Internal framework error
%MCC-F-TRM_FAILURE, PM unable to continue
%DCL-W-SKPDAT, image data (records not beginning with "$") ignored
%NONAME-F-NOMSG, Message number 0326E44C

There is no SYS$TIMEZONE_DIFFERENTIAL logical defined.  MCC_TDF is defined 
as -5.  I cannot find a "DECmcc TCP/IP DA FM" license.  I do have the 
DECmcc tcpip license loaded.

Any ideas?

Thanks,
Karen
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
3947.1-5:00 instead of -5 ?TOOK::MCPHERSONpre-retinal integrationThu Oct 22 1992 21:1511
>
>There is no SYS$TIMEZONE_DIFFERENTIAL logical defined.  MCC_TDF is defined 
>as -5.  I cannot find a "DECmcc TCP/IP DA FM" license.  I do have the 
>DECmcc tcpip license loaded.
>

Would it make any difference if you defined MCC_TDF as "-5:00" instead of -5 ?

$ sho log mcc_tdf
   "MCC_TDF" = "-4:00" (LNM$SYSTEM_TABLE)

3947.2Still failsPARVAX::STORMFri Oct 23 1992 10:2111
>Would it make any difference if you defined MCC_TDF as "-5:00" instead of -5 ?

>$ sho log mcc_tdf
>   "MCC_TDF" = "-4:00" (LNM$SYSTEM_TABLE)


Nope, makes absolutly no difference.  The MCC IVP's still fail, and I still get
the stack dump.

Karen
3947.3Should have made a differenceTOOK::GUERTINIt fall down, go boomFri Oct 23 1992 14:039
    Well, I haven't tracked the code for the last 2 releases, but at one
    time, -5 was definitely an invalid TDF value.  It was interpreted as
    -5 days, which is "off the scale".  Keep it at "-5:00".  The MCC_TDF
    logical value of "-5" may be getting stored in a command procedure
    (either sys$startup:mcc_logical_bms.com, or
    sys$startup:mcc_logical_dir.com).  How are you setting the new value?
    
    -Matt.
    
3947.4using mcc_logal_dirPARVAX::STORMFri Oct 23 1992 16:3614
>    Well, I haven't tracked the code for the last 2 releases, but at one
>    time, -5 was definitely an invalid TDF value.  It was interpreted as
>    -5 days, which is "off the scale".  Keep it at "-5:00".  The MCC_TDF
>    logical value of "-5" may be getting stored in a command procedure
>    (either sys$startup:mcc_logical_bms.com, or
>    sys$startup:mcc_logical_dir.com).  How are you setting the new value?
 
I am setting MCC_TDF in mcc_logical_dir.com.

I'll try rebooting the system to see if that makes a difference (though I
doubt it) and let you all know.

Karen   

3947.5What about the other logical?TOOK::GUERTINIt fall down, go boomFri Oct 23 1992 17:204
    Just for Kicks, what is the SYS$TIMEZONE_DIFFERENTIAL logical set to
    (if you have one defined)?
    
    -Matt.
3947.6No sys$timezone_differentialPARVAX::STORMFri Oct 23 1992 18:133
SYS$TIMEZONE_DIFFERENTIAL is not defined.

Karen