T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3937.1 | it's in 1.3 | TOOK::MCPHERSON | pre-retinal integration | Wed Oct 21 1992 23:45 | 3 |
| What you are asking for "(map lock") is already in the 1.3 release. It works.
/doug
|
3937.2 | Good ! | ROM01::PROFETI | Livia EIS Rome | Thu Oct 22 1992 08:18 | 7 |
| Wonderful, I think the customer will accept to wait for a few months.
Can you tell me how it's implemented ? For example if it's a matter of
user customization or whatever ?
Many thanks for your quick reply.
Livia
|
3937.3 | simple. | TOOK::MCPHERSON | pre-retinal integration | Thu Oct 22 1992 09:38 | 4 |
| You just click on the picture of the padlock at the top of the screen.
Easy enough?
/doug
|
3937.4 | MB1 doesn't drag either | MCC1::DITMARS | Pete | Thu Oct 22 1992 11:24 | 14 |
| Because V1.3 is Motif, MB1 (which is what you're
always pressing to select things) is NOT the button
used to drag things areound. You use MB2 to do that.
This is Motif compliant behavior. It also almost
entirely prevents accidental modification of the map,
even without the fun padlock.
p.s.
In V1.3, MB2 is also the button used to "drop" entities
on the map during an Add operation. I mention this
only because it took me a while to get used to it,
and I expect it will take other map users a while too.
Be prepared! :^)
|
3937.5 | Digital understands the problem | SKIBUM::GASSMAN | | Thu Oct 22 1992 12:29 | 11 |
| One thing MCC should probably look into in future releases is the MSU
approach to security of functions. In the next release, there are 16
privledge bits, each tied to a function. Each remote map user has a
profile indicating which functions they can use. SET can be disabled,
DECnet or bridge can be disabled, map editing can be disabled. In
addition, events are generated when the map is edited, allowing the
event log to show what occured and by which user. These are features
which customers have been asking for - so some joint engineering effort
may be useful in this area for follow on MCC releases.
bill
|
3937.6 | Privileges/Protections are an absolute MUST | CUJO::HILL | Dan Hill-Net.Mgt.-Customer Resident | Sun Oct 25 1992 01:51 | 13 |
| The privs/protection mechanisms Bill describes are a must for my
customer. There are already many types of users who require different
privs. My customers have been asking for Map Lock and Protection
schemes for two years.
I've been hearing some good things about V1.3. This is just another
piece of good news. Believe it or not, being able to lock the map (and
other seemingly small issues) is actually a rather big item for some
customers.
By the way, is MSU still in parallel development with DECmcc/EMA?
-Dan
|