T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3720.1 | QAR 3418 | TOOK::MINTZ | LKG2-2 near pole X3, cube 6072, dtn 226-5033 | Thu Sep 10 1992 16:45 | 1 |
| Entered as QAR 3418 at priority M
|
3720.2 | This problem looks pervasive! | VCSESU::WADE | Bill Wade, VAXc Systems & Support Eng | Fri Sep 11 1992 11:03 | 63 |
| There is something seriously wrong here -
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Alarm, 11-SEP-1992 09:45:59 !!!!!!!!!!!!!! [1]
!Domain: LOCAL_NS:.config Severity: Major
!Notification Entity: Bridge LOCAL_NS:.bridge.500-2
!Event Source: Domain LOCAL_NS:.config Rule test5
!Event: OSI Rule Fired
!
! Event Type = QualityofServiceAlarm
! Event Time = 11-SEP-1992 09:45:58.05
! Probable Cause = Unknown
! Additional Info = { (
! significance = True,
! information = "Rule fired: Bridge
! LOCAL_NS:.bridge.500-2 Seconds
! Operating = 861079 11-SEP-1992
! 09:45:57.93" ),
! (
! significance = True,
! information = "(Bridge LOCAL_NS:.bridge.500-2
! Seconds Operating > 900000, at
! every=00:01)" ) }
! Managed Object = Bridge LOCAL_NS:.bridge.500-2
! Perceived Severity = Major
! Additional Text = "running too long
! "
!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Alarm, 11-SEP-1992 09:46:15 !!!!!!!!!!!!!! [1]
!Domain: LOCAL_NS:.config Severity: Major
!Notification Entity: Bridge LOCAL_NS:.bridge.500-2 PHY Port 1
!Event Source: Domain LOCAL_NS:.config Rule test6
!Event: OSI Rule Fired
!
! Event Type = QualityofServiceAlarm
! Event Time = 11-SEP-1992 09:46:14.58
! Probable Cause = Unknown
! Additional Info = { (
! significance = True,
! information = "Rule fired: Bridge
! LOCAL_NS:.bridge.500-2 PHY Port 1
! LEM Link Errors = 0 11-SEP-1992
! 09:46:14.48" ),
! (
! significance = True,
! information = "(Bridge LOCAL_NS:.bridge.500-2
! PHY Port 1 LEM Link Errors > 5,
! at every=00:01)" ) }
! Managed Object = Bridge LOCAL_NS:.bridge.500-2 PHY
! Port 1
! Perceived Severity = Major
! Additional Text = " too many errors
! "
!
!
!
exit
!
|
3720.3 | I would guess a problem with alarms or FCL's handling of 64-bit integers | MCC1::DITMARS | Pete | Fri Sep 11 1992 12:34 | 3 |
| It's been a problem (addressed several different times) in the past.
Is this on ultrix?
|
3720.4 | | VCSESU::WADE | Bill Wade, VAXc Systems & Support Eng | Fri Sep 11 1992 13:10 | 41 |
| Pete,
I don't remember seeing this problem addressed previously -
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Alarm, 11-SEP-1992 09:46:15 !!!!!!!!!!!!!! [1]
!Domain: LOCAL_NS:.config Severity: Major
!Notification Entity: Bridge LOCAL_NS:.bridge.500-2 PHY Port 1
!Event Source: Domain LOCAL_NS:.config Rule test6
!Event: OSI Rule Fired
!
! Event Type = QualityofServiceAlarm
! Event Time = 11-SEP-1992 09:46:14.58
! Probable Cause = Unknown
! Additional Info = { (
! significance = True,
! information = "Rule fired: Bridge
! LOCAL_NS:.bridge.500-2 PHY Port 1
! LEM Link Errors = 0 11-SEP-1992
! 09:46:14.48" ),
! (
! significance = True,
! information = "(Bridge LOCAL_NS:.bridge.500-2
! PHY Port 1 LEM Link Errors > 5,
! at every=00:01)" ) }
! Managed Object = Bridge LOCAL_NS:.bridge.500-2 PHY
! Port 1
! Perceived Severity = Major
! Additional Text = " too many errors
! "
!
!
!
exit
!
|
3720.5 | | MCC1::DITMARS | Pete | Mon Sep 14 1992 14:55 | 4 |
| I didn't mean it was something you should have known about.
I meant that FCL/alarms have both had problems with 64-bit integers
in the past (e.g. baselevels of V1.1/V1.2).
|
3720.6 | Fixed with new MCC_ALARMS_FM.EXE. | VCSESU::WADE | Bill Wade, VAXc Systems & Support Eng | Fri Oct 02 1992 12:33 | 6 |
|
I was given a new MCC_ALARMS_FM.EXE image which I tested and it
fixed the problem. But I'm not sure if a patch will be released or it
will have to wait for 1.3.
Bill
|
3720.7 | QAR 03418 - Answered | TOOK::MINTZ | LKG2-2 near pole X3, cube 6072, dtn 226-5033 | Tue Oct 13 1992 16:27 | 1 |
| The answer to this QAR indicates that the fix will be included in V1.3
|