| Title: | DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT. |
| Notice: | Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187 |
| Moderator: | TAEC::BEROUD |
| Created: | Mon Aug 21 1989 |
| Last Modified: | Wed Jun 04 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 6497 |
| Total number of notes: | 27359 |
I've been asked by a customer as to the extent of our complex rule statement capabilities and I've seen reference in old notes (303) that indicate that it was not available in V1.1. Can anyone tell me if something like: NODE4 * MAX ADDRESS < 100 & MAX AREA < 50 Would be concidered to be a valid expression? If so, are there any limitations on numbers of expressions? Any limitations on entity catagories? This particular customer is an ip shop and will be interested in comparing muliple MIB variables. Sorry, but they don't have specific cases.....their only guidance is a rough estimate of what a government contract hints at. Any help appreciated. Al
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3663.1 | complex rules not supported. | TOOK::MCPHERSON | Life is hard. Play short. | Tue Sep 01 1992 15:24 | 4 |
That's be nice, but unfortunately the Alarms FM can't handle AND or OR multiple conditions... I.e. there is no "complex rule" support. /doug | |||||
| 3663.2 | FOUR62::LICAUSE | Al Licause (338-5661) | Tue Sep 01 1992 16:38 | 11 | |
thanks very much for the quick reply. Unfortunate as it is, it would be interesting to know if such a capability is available from any other vendor. The capability sounds nice, but don't really know if it is practicle. I suspect similar data gathering could be accomplished through command procedures though. Al | |||||