T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3650.1 | That's it | TOOK::MINTZ | Erik Mintz, dtn 226-5033 | Fri Aug 28 1992 09:49 | 5 |
| The AM and FM kits are all that there is to ELM.
What makes you think something is missing?
-- Erik
|
3650.2 | That's the info I needed | CONTRA::PMCVAY | Valuing Diverse Enterprise Empowerment | Fri Aug 28 1992 09:56 | 10 |
| > What makes you think something is missing?
New user ignorance, of course... :-)
If there is a complaint about MCC, it's that it can do anything! I'm
lost in new-MCC-manager information overload at the moment. The T012
kit stated that ELM-FM and ELM-AM had to be installed first. And I
inferred from that, that FM, AM, and "base" ELM may have been different
kits, and I could have been missing one. So, this note was a sanity
check. Thanks for the fast response.
|
3650.3 | | SLINK::CHILDS | The Fringe | Fri Aug 28 1992 12:01 | 10 |
| | The T012
| kit stated that ELM-FM and ELM-AM had to be installed first.
There was only one kit, containing both the AMs and FMs, for Field Test
(MCCELMT012). That kit required that both the AM and FM *licenses* be
loaded before installing it.
I hope you aren't gonna install any of the Field Test kits!
Please use SSB V1.2 kits for everything.
|
3650.4 | Pleading ignorance again... | CONTRA::PMCVAY | Valuing Diverse Enterprise Empowerment | Fri Aug 28 1992 12:08 | 4 |
| > Please use SSB V1.2 kits for everything.
What about TSAM and NMCC? All I can find is V1.0 kits for those. Or
are they obsolete (included in V1.2)?
|
3650.5 | TSAM V1.0 -> BMS V1.2 | TOOK::MINTZ | Erik Mintz, dtn 226-5033 | Fri Aug 28 1992 12:23 | 5 |
| According to note 3.180, the TSAM V1.0 kit runs on BMS V1.2
NMCC is not tightly coupled with DECmcc. It did ship on the EMS kit,
but I believe it is considered obsolete as of BMS V1.2.
|