| Title: | DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT. |
| Notice: | Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187 |
| Moderator: | TAEC::BEROUD |
| Created: | Mon Aug 21 1989 |
| Last Modified: | Wed Jun 04 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 6497 |
| Total number of notes: | 27359 |
Does anyone know the latest onthe Vitalink VBAM 1.2 saga??
-- cheers,
Guy
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3501.1 | a worthless reply | MCDOUG::MCPHERSON | Life is hard. Play short. | Wed Aug 05 1992 09:10 | 4 |
I still know no more than I did when I wrote note 3167.1 /doug | |||||
| 3501.2 | CADSYS::LEMONS | And we thank you for your support. | Thu Aug 13 1992 11:25 | 13 | |
I'm sorry to step in and beat a dead horse, but I've spent � an hour, looking through this and the VITALINK_BRIDGE conference, and haven't found these questions answered, so: 1) A DIR/TITLE of 3.* yields notes indicating the latest Vitalink AM to be V1.0. Is this true? If not, where is the latest located? 2) Will the latest Vitalink AM run on V1.2 SSB and produce any useful infor- mation? I understand that we're still waiting for the 'real' V1.2 kit from Vitalink. Thanks! tl | |||||
| 3501.3 | See 3365.* and 3167.* | TOOK::MCPHERSON | Life is hard. Play short. | Thu Aug 13 1992 11:30 | 12 |
>1) A DIR/TITLE of 3.* yields notes indicating the latest Vitalink AM to be V1.0. >Is this true? Yep. >2) Will the latest Vitalink AM run on V1.2 SSB and produce any useful infor- >mation? I understand that we're still waiting for the 'real' V1.2 kit from >Vitalink. Nope. /doug | |||||