[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT. |
Notice: | Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187 |
Moderator: | TAEC::BEROUD |
|
Created: | Mon Aug 21 1989 |
Last Modified: | Wed Jun 04 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 6497 |
Total number of notes: | 27359 |
3452.0. "alarm problem in DECmcc for ULTRIX SSB" by MXOV06::LERIOS () Wed Jul 29 1992 00:00
Hi:
I have a problem with an alarm generated using a comparison
format (using wilcards) which has the following characteristics:
1)the entity attribute was packet rate
2)the selected entities were node phase IV (in fact, in the domain I am working
these entities are DECrouters)
3) The comparison rule fields are:
Entity: node4 *
Attribute name: packet rate
Relational Operator: GT
Comparison value: 5
4) the severity I choose was critical
after I created it, I enabled the alarm and the operation begun ok.
However a few minutes later,and like result of the show status command,
I got the next message (in the infomation field of a rule exception):
"Software logic error detected<EOS>%MCC-S-SPECIALIZED_EXCEPTION, success
with management module-specific exception reply"
besides, I found in the rule exception:
managed object: MCC 0 alarms rule "rule_name"
any help would be appreciated
ah!
the configuration I am using is:
DECstation 5000/125
ULTRIX V4.2A
24 MB (memory)
120 MB (swap)
rz56 (hard disk)
thanks in advance and regards
Julio Lerios (Digital Mexico)
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3452.1 | see rel notes 4.8.3 | HERON::PATEL_A | LoLo-AQIC-I82Q-B4IP, - LMF | Wed Jul 29 1992 04:20 | 8 |
| reading from the releas notes.. 4.8.3
2. An alarm rule containing a global wildcard and a statistical
attribute is not allowed.
I guess what you are doing may work if you specify the instance
Amrit
|
3452.2 | alarm problem in DECmcc for ULTRIX SSB | MXOV06::LERIOS | | Wed Jul 29 1992 12:26 | 8 |
|
Amrit thanks for your comment you are right!
I hope in the future this restriction
will no exist...
Julio
|