Title: | DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT. |
Notice: | Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187 |
Moderator: | TAEC::BEROUD |
Created: | Mon Aug 21 1989 |
Last Modified: | Wed Jun 04 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 6497 |
Total number of notes: | 27359 |
I have been having trouble with alarms on Vitalink bridges. The rule I am using checks for module state change from forwarding to *. The interval is every minute (the customer is very adamant about having this polling interval). The problem we are having is that some of the bridges will fire the exception routine saying that MCC can't communicate with target. This happens so much on some of the bridges that I had to change the exception procedure to use logging instead of mail. My concern is that there may be an instance where someone actually disconnects the Translan or some real condition causes a failure to communicate and we won't be able to tell the difference. Is there a Vitalink or DECmcc parameter that we can adjust so the alarm won't time out so much or so easily? Thanks, Rick
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3428.1 | Check 1551.* | ANTIK::WESTERBERG | Stefan Westerberg DS Stockholm | Fri Jul 24 1992 19:51 | 19 |
> Is there a Vitalink or DECmcc parameter that we can adjust so the alarm > won't time out so much or so easily? Sorry to say Rick, there isen't that much you can do about it until the next version of the Translan AM comes out on the market. If you want some history reading about this subject check entry 1551 in this conference. But the best trick to reduse the exception is to start the alarms rule with at least a 3s interval. /Stefan P.S. The error messages described in 1551 changed it's nature when upgrading to VMS 5.4-3 or 5.5 to be "Cannot Communicate with target" or "Communication with the target has been interupted". |