Title: | DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT. |
Notice: | Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187 |
Moderator: | TAEC::BEROUD |
Created: | Mon Aug 21 1989 |
Last Modified: | Wed Jun 04 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 6497 |
Total number of notes: | 27359 |
<<< EMDS::$1$DUA10:[NOTES$LIBRARY]HUB_MGNT.NOTE;1 >>> -< Hub Management Conference >- ================================================================================ Note 50.0 90L+ NOT supported in TSAM!!! No replies ZPOVC::RAMARAJ 8 lines 20-JUL-1992 23:00 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The TSAM SSB has just been released. What is the reason for DS90L+ for not being supported in the AM, when older modules, like 90L and new one like like 90TL are supported. Is this a limitation on the AM or on the firmware on 90L+? Raj Singapore
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3391.1 | Bad timing | TOOK::FONSECA | I heard it through the Grapevine... | Wed Jul 22 1992 10:50 | 16 |
The DS90L+ came out after work had been done to add the DS90L, DS90TL, and DS700. We had a tight schedule, and did not have time to go back and add the new server model. I don't remember the sequence of events, but it may have also had something to do with TSM not supporting the DS90L+ during this portion of developement. (Even though it does now, TSAM is layered on TSM, and it is much more work for us to add server types than TSM.) By the way, as far as TSAM is concerned, the DS90TL, DS300 and DS700 are treated almost identically, and did not require much work for their differences. The DS90L and DS90l+ are very different from most of the other terminal servers, and require loads of special case code. If and when there is another version of TSAM, this server model will undoubtedly be added. -Dave |