[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT. |
Notice: | Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187 |
Moderator: | TAEC::BEROUD |
|
Created: | Mon Aug 21 1989 |
Last Modified: | Wed Jun 04 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 6497 |
Total number of notes: | 27359 |
3387.0. "Need some light on the Notification FM behaviour" by BALZAC::MARKOWSKI () Mon Jul 20 1992 11:20
Hello,
I am running DECmcc V1.2.0 on VMS V5.4-1.
There is something I don't understand with the Notification FM.
I have created rules (Occurs Rule) with the Iconic Map (the severity is
always different of "indeterminate").
1 . If I create the following notification request :
Enabled X25_SUPERVISION Entity List = (SARE *), Events = (COM DISPON,
COM INDISPO)
to be notified with EVENTS, the events are noted as "indeterminate"
when the rules fire :
. on the Iconic Map (the bell contains the "?" sign unstead of the number
representing the severity of the event),
. on the Notification window, the severity field contains "indeterminate",
. on the Notification Detail window, the Severity field is empty.
Why the severity field is not taken in account ?
2 . If I create the following notification request :
Enabled X25_SUPERVISION
to be notified with ALARMS, the alarms are noted with the correct severity
when the rules fire :
. on the Iconic Map (the bell contains the number representing the
severity of the event),
. on the Notification window, the severity field contains the correct
value,
. on the Notification Detail window, the Severity field is always
empty but the Perceived Severity field contains the correct value.
Are these differente behaviours normal ? If yes, could somebody give me some
explanations.
Thank's for any light.
Regards,
sylviane.
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines
|
---|