T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3306.1 | Hirschmann . | BONNET::MALAISE | All you need is laugh! | Fri Jul 03 1992 14:36 | 8 |
|
Regarding Hirschmann get in touch with Frank Zilebor @fus
DTN :772-4187 (Germany) , he contacted me today on this subject .
Regards ,
MaRc
|
3306.2 | The Hirschmann story... | BIKINI::KRAUSE | European NewProductEngineer for MCC | Mon Jul 06 1992 03:50 | 26 |
| Sorry to correct you, Marc, but the name is Frank Zelibor @SUS (he
is the sales person dealing with Hirschmann).
I'm still involved in this long winded 'project' as a technical
consultant (in fact it was my idea to develop an AM for the
Hirschmann hub).
Status as of today: There is NO specific access module for the
Hirschmann hub. They payed for a pre-study that has been done by
DEC's local engineering in Munich (thanks to Helmut Schimmel). Now
they are negotiating who is going to pay how much for the actual
development. Don't hold your breath, I don't expect development to
start very soon.
Now for the good news: Since Hirschmann's hub management card "MIKE"
talks SNMP we can use the TCP/IP SNMP AM to manage the hub.
Hirschmann provides their MIB extension in standard format which can
be loaded into MCC. [They got some problems with table indexes and
they try to blame MCC on this, but I will sort this out soon :-]
If you have further technical questions, call me. If you have
non-technical questions, call Frank.
Regards,
*Robert
|
3306.3 | any ideas on HP for Hirschmann? | COL01::LUNT | | Mon Jul 06 1992 09:08 | 12 |
| Hi,
Thanks for the info. One question though, An AM is not
going to be developed in the short run, but does anyone know
how the HP-open View integration will be? A graphical picture or also
only SNMP and standard icons?
I ask, because the MIKE card is being advertised as being
managemable by both HP-Open View and DECmcc. It would be nice to
be ahead of HP in a graphical interface to Hirschmann.
Julie Ann
|
3306.4 | Annecy is working on the POD | ANNECY::KIRKHAM | Pete Kirkham @AEO | Tue Jul 07 1992 04:08 | 12 |
| As far as I know the LRT system uses the same SINTROM POD that we are
working on at the moment. This SINTROM (now called EIT) POD has an SNMP
interface which we've tried but not yet really tested. If you want more
details please contact me. We already have been offered a reasonable
discount by EIT so if you want to buy one that would probably be
worthwhile.
Our aim is to integrate the POD into the DECmcc environment since
although we can use the SNMP AM to get the data that doesn't help us
when we want to display it in a meaniningful way.
Pete
|
3306.5 | HP-no, but MTI has | BIKINI::KRAUSE | European NewProductEngineer for MCC | Tue Jul 07 1992 05:01 | 20 |
| HP has no graphical picture, either. But they do a better job on
SNMP management in general. E.g. their 'Application Builder' allows
to define arbitrary groups of variables that will be shown with one
request. This is similar to MCC's attribute groups, but these are
not easily user-definable.
There IS a front panel view for the Hirschmann hub integrated into
MTI's SNMP management product (I forgot the name- LANCE? LANNET?). I
saw it at CeBIT this year, running on a SUN IPX.
The only real step ahead that I can see at the moment is the
Hirschmann AM. A few notes back Dominique Pacco described what he
did for the Chipcom hub. This is exactly what I want to have for
Hirschmann. If you have a strong business case (BAYER?) EIC may
invest some money in the project.
Let's keep in touch, maybe we can do something to speed up the
process.
*Robert
|
3306.6 | yes, a Hirschmann and other AM's are really needed | COL01::LUNT | | Fri Jul 10 1992 09:23 | 25 |
| Hello Robert,
yes, let's definitely keep in touch. BAYER will be evaluating
network managment tools this fall. They will choose one
tool for complete network management- SNA and DECnet/TCPIP world.
They want to standardize the network management environment. SEcondly
they then might choose a "subtool" if you will, to manage SNA and
one to manage DECnet/TCPIP (the rest of the world ). Since we already
are here with DECmcc, we have a good chance. Word is though, that in
early fall HP will be demonstrating open view to BAYER. They may also
look into other solutions.
We have probably 20 hirschmann hubs already installed. I hope
that many, atleast the central hubs, will be outfitted with the MIKE
card.
But the main reason that we need such AM's is to keep DECmcc as
the standard here. And the better interfaces/AM's/FM's that we can
provide, the better chance we will have. And provide on a timely
basis.
Julie Ann
Networks and Communications, Cologne Germany
@coo
|